Slashdot Mirror


Goblet of Fire Teaser Trailer Released

bryan8m writes "The teaser trailer for the next installment of the Harry Potter series has hit the web. The clip begins with a bit of a flashback but quickly turns to the triwizard tournament with some amazing visuals. And there is new director (again): Mike Newell."

4 of 336 comments (clear)

  1. Ahem, wrong site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Isn't Harry Potter a kids' movie? As in for young children?
    If so, what is it doing on here?
    By the poweres vested in me by the Late Pope EyeEye, I hereby declare -1 Offtopic on this news story.
    If I get labelled as trolling for this post I'll be pissed off. This is my honest opinion, hopefully I'm just not the only one...

  2. Re:Very interesting.....! by schon · · Score: 0, Troll

    Sexualising children is WRONG

    Again with the straw man - tell me, are you missing the point deliberately?

    She's not a child, she's a teenager who is well past puberty, and in much of the world, she's past the age of consent. (Which has been pointed out to you before, and yet you continue to ignore it while making your straw man argument.)

  3. Re:Emma Watson by 0123456 · · Score: 0, Troll

    "Well, matey, she's English, and in England she's jailbait."

    Barely: and if she'd been born on a council estate she'd have a couple of kids of her own by now. You're living in a fantasy world if you think that underage sex isn't a regular occurence in the UK.

    In any case, it wouldn't surprise me at all if NuLab reduced the age of consent to fourteen: after all, they've already reduced the butt-shagging age for boys to sixteen, and I'm sure they'd like to reduce that further.

  4. Re:Emma Watson by schon · · Score: 0, Troll

    She's underage.

    Perhaps in your part of the world, but not in many others.

    She's off limits.

    Why? Because you say so?

    If you don't understand that, then you have a big problem.

    I'm sorry, but it appears that you're the one with the problem - you are deliberately ignoring evidence presented to you that you are wrong.

    How old is she now? 15? Neither is an appropriate age to be trying to look at her underwear.

    Bullshit. You have made an arbitrary decision about based on an imcomplete representation of facts. There are *many* people here who are her age (typically the ones making these comments), and you're saying it's inappropriate for them to want to sneak a look?

    If you believe that, you should go in for some councilling - repressing your feelings that much is just asking for trouble.

    there's a difference between two six year olds playing doctor and a twenty one year old wanting to play doctor with a six year old

    Ohh.. another straw man! Seems to me that we were discussing 15 year olds, weren't we?

    Got a tip for you: if you want people to take you seriously, you shouldn't make stupid arguments that have no bearing on the topic at hand, all you do is make it look like you don't have any relevant arguments, and are grasping at straws in order to convince yourself you're right.