Cuban Says RIAA Damages Should be $5 Per Month
Thomas Hawk writes "Mark Cuban is arguing over at Blog Maverick that with the introduction of Yahoo!'s new $5 per month music service that this needs to become the new de facto 'damages' that the RIAA ought to be able to claim when suing kids. After all, when the kids could have paid for the music via Yahoo! for $5 a month it makes it hard to say the music loss is worth more than that. 'The RIAA can no longer claim that students who are downloading music are costing them thousands of dollars each. They cant claim much of anything actually. In essence, Yahoo just turned possession of a controlled music substance into a misdemeanor. Payable by a $5 per month fine.'"
After reading the title I was wondering why the RIAA would care what someone in Cuba thinks.
Who do those Cuban people think they are, telling American companies what to do!?
I remember seeing a user on slashdot with the name FidelCastro. But it wasn't him that submitted it.
Your may rob from the rich but i'll have your soul if you even think of giving to the poor!
Just want to clarify... you mean a 5 watt INCANDESANT light bulb right? ...Because a 5 watt incandesant bulb would be pretty dim while 5 watt fluorescent bulb would actually be considerably brighter in comparison. And then there are 5 watt LED bulbs...
:D
This is slashdot after all. Please be specific about the technologies you refer to.
First, it's possible to make a fair use defense based on your ownership of the CD or DVD.
"Your honor, yes I know I allowed 5000 people to download music from my computer...but I own the original CD" holds up CD "so it falls under the fair use law."
Then the kids defense attorney rises "Your honor, as you can see, we would like to plead mental insanity. This kid is a fucking moron."
I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.