Slashdot Mirror


Selling Your Attention to Spammers

Dotnaught writes "Can the free market stop spam where technology has failed? As described in InformationWeek, Professor Marshall Van Alstyne of Boston University School of Management has co-authored a soon-to-be-published paper that proposes an "attention bond" -- money put up by email senders that recipients collect only if they consider the message a waste of time. Supposedly, this market-based filter performs better than a perfect technology-based solution, with no false positives or negatives. A company called Vanquish already has a working model. Is selling one's attention the answer to spam?"

4 of 307 comments (clear)

  1. What do pundits say? by bogaboga · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    This seems to be an important topic in today's computer world. I am suprised that I have not seen any view from pundits before.

    The trouble is some of the pundits know so little to even know that they, (the pundits) know nothing. We live in interesting times, don't we?

  2. I'M AN OPEN PROXY, BAN ME! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    This message is posted from an open proxy. Open proxies are used to crapflood sites like Slashdot. Please mod this comment down so the proxy gets banned. If you don't care about open proxies, please mod this comment down because it's offensive to NIGGERS and KIKES.

    Tue May 17 22:16:28 CEST 2005 [3547]

  3. Humph! Market-based my ante! In Soviet Russia... by 10101001011 · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    In Soviet Russia, spammers who are caught don't get a lawyer for 72 hours...

  4. Re:The problem with spam is weak enforcement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    Just divert some of the FBI Baltimore people who do child pornography, who are already experienced at tracking people on the Internet, off that job

    I was with you until there. As annoying as spam is, it's not in the same league as child pornography - that really does scar children for life. There will be no diverting of anti-child pornography teams.