Free STIX Fonts to be Released in September

tbspit writes "The STIX fonts project has announced that version 1.0 of the STIX fonts should be released in September 2005. The comprehensive font set is to include mathematical symbols and alphabets, and is intended to serve the scientific and engineering community for electronic and print publication. The STIX fonts should be available as fully hinted Type 1 and True Type fonts. The STIX project will also create a TeX implementation. Progress towards release can be monitored here."

Comments

Use MathML fonts

[jvj24601]

http://www.mozilla.org/projects/mathml/fonts/

They are freely downloadable (free as in beer), and they have the backing of being used and tested by the Mozilla foundation.

Re:Use MathML fonts

[hritcu]

While awaiting the comprehensive set of fonts being made by the STIX project to cover all the symbols in MathML, use the font installers (on the right) to install the fonts on your system if you do not have them already. MIT has developed convenient font installers for Windows and the Mac, following licensing negotiations through this project and mozilla.org staff (especially considering the open-source nature of Mozilla). The respective font owners have made provision for the fonts to be packaged into these installers, with the aim of helping to boost the adoption of MathML into the mainstream.

MathML-enabled Mozilla uses the MIT fonts, but it first maps them to the right entities. This happens in the code because the fonts, although free, are not to be touched or redistributed. Without the right mapping the fonts are useless, and for anything other than standalone applications you cannot perform such a mapping. So I think that you might be forgetting that the main focus of MathML is the Web not standalone applications. The CSS "font-*" attributes don't allow characters to be mapped to different fonts so I doubt that the MIT fonts are of any real use on the Web (unless you are targeting only the users of MathML-enabled Mozilla).

Re:But does it support unicode ?.

[reidbold]

from the site:

The STIX Fonts have been designed to work with all web browsers, word processors, and other scholarly communications software, as well as all general purpose software.

The Fonts are based on the Unicode(TM) standard for character representation. By expressing all characters with their Unicode value, programs that you use will select the correct glyph for representation.

A character is a unique letter or symbol that is defined by its Unicode value.

Not all Unicode values are included in the STIX Fonts, but there is extensive coverage of Latin alphabets, Greek, and Cyrillic.

So based on the sound of it, this will work in different languages using unicode.

Re:How long does it usually take?

[pthisis]

[quote]Nevertheless, the time it took them to make STIX almost ready looks hilarious to me. Does anybody know how long does it usually take to design such a font?[/quote]

Computer Modern was designed over about 12 years.

Of course, Knuth was working on other things (notably Metafont and TeX) in that period as well.

Re:What do they look like?

[ByteSlicer]

I think they might prove usable. Judge for yourself.

Re:What do they look like?

[Cmdr TECO]

Yes, it is very well designed -- technically excellent; optical scaling, too. Unfortunately, it is a "modern" (18th/19th century; aka "Didone") typeface, in imitation of the one used in the first edition of The Art of Computer Programming, and suffers from all the faults of that low point of typographic design: extreme contrast, exaggerated round terminals and spindly affected tails, stiff vertical axis, and tiny apertures.

Re:How long does it usually take?

[Anonymous Coward]

Actually, Knuth did all the programming stuff on TeX himself. There is this story around that he wrote a specification for two of his students once and "all they had to do" was the implementation. After some weeks of travel or so he returned and saw that they only had a very small prototype ready then. He realized that his specification was not precise enough and most of his ideas were in his mind but not in this spec. He started to write the code himself then.

Re:Bold

[Anonymous Coward]

It sounds like your fonts are messed up. With Bistream Vera Sans on my system (What most systems point the Sans alias to), I can tell if the font is bold even when the letters themselves are illegible.