Slashdot Mirror


Canada Task Force Calls For Anti-Spam Law

Canrights writes "Canada's National Task Force on Spam released its final report today. Despite prior spam actions on privacy grounds in Canada, the task force is calling for a tough new anti-spam law including penalties for failure to obtain appropriate opt-in consents before sending commercial email as well as private right of action to encourage Canadian lawsuits against spammers. Professor Michael Geist, who headed up the legal aspects of the task force, provides a good summary of the recommendations."

3 of 91 comments (clear)

  1. Precisely which "tough penalties"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting
    the task force is calling for a tough new anti-spam law including _____ penalties for failure to obtain appropriate opt-in consents
    Is "death" the missing word?
    Or are there some bulk mailers for whom life in a forced labor camp on water and SPAM would do? (I know that latter thought risks being modded down for undue leniency...;-))
  2. Do not e-mail list by G4from128k · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The U.S. FTC "do-not-call" list worked wonders for phone spam for our household. We used to get at least 40 phone spams per month and now get less about 3 per month. Perhaps it could be employed to reduce the volume of spam, too.

    To prevent contributing to spammers' DB of addresses, the list could be handled on a query-only basis. It's not fool proof, but any spammer caught with an HD full of "do-not-email" names would be in for a world of hurt.

    I'm sure this proposal will get the obligatory "why this won't work" form letter, but then what solution to spam doesn't have a a long list of problems.

    --
    Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do.
  3. Re:I don't like the encouragement to litigation by Husgaard · · Score: 3, Interesting
    In Denmark where I live we also have also a relatively non-litigious society.

    We have anti-spam laws, but these are constructed so that it is almost impossible for an individual or a company to start a court case against a possible spammer.

    OTOH we have a public institution Forbrugerombudsmanden (in danish). They accept complaints on any kind of possible spam originating from Denmark.

    When too many spam complaints are directed to them they go to court against the spammer. I don't think they have ever lost a court case against spammers, and in the cases where they have won the fines have been high enough to stop the spammer and stop other possible spammers from even starting.

    In two cases I know that danish spammers have stopped after I have threathened to tell Forbrugerombudsmanden.

    Does it help? Well, just look at the amount of spam originating from Denmark.