Slashdot Mirror


Installing Fedora Core 4 on the Mac mini

Tammy Fox writes "The Mac mini is all the rave. Discover how to install the soon-to-be-released Fedora Core 4 on this tiny desktop appliance, including new features in Fedora Core 4 to support the new hardware."

6 of 86 comments (clear)

  1. The article leaves out one detail... by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...Linux on Mac mini (or any Mac) won't support any built-in wireless hardware. I don't have any wireless hardware on my mini, but I can see that being important.

    If a person wants a GUI-less Mac, it is possible to run OS X without the GUI as a text-only BSD variant. I forgot where I found the doc, I think you comment out one command in a script. I think that doc might be at the osxfaq site.

  2. Hurrah! by AnObfuscator · · Score: 1, Interesting

    As a long-time Mac Zealot (11 years and counting), I'm love the recent increase in attention linux-ppc is receiving! Now that Apple is "cool" again, and now that Apple's OS has "geek cred", it's finally getting some serious attention from the FOSS world, and that is great news for me.

    I'm no big Fedora fan (I'm a Debain/Ubuntu user), but I'm grateful for the work RH is putting in to make Fedora Mac-friendly.

    Thanks, guys.

    --
    multifariam.net -- yet another nerd blog
  3. Re:Why? by adam1101 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    They're reasonably powerful systems with very low power consumption: the entire system (minus display) usually stays under 20W. Even the Pentium-M consumes much more on the desktop (granted, they're also much faster). The most comparable competition in terms of power consumption are Via Mini-ITX systems, which tend to be much slower.

  4. But...why? by onebuttonmouse · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This seems like a semi-on-topic question. Why would I want to install Red Hat on my Mac? This isn't meant to be a troll, I like Linux, I use Debian Sarge and Ubuntu Hoary on retired x86 boxes at work. I just would love to know if anyone is running Linux on their Mac - what are you using it for? Why can't I use OS X to do it?

    --
    MacBook Pro. Worst name since the Bicycle
  5. I'd consider Mac mini for OpenBSD firewall by AHumbleOpinion · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ... on newer hardware, especially since you can't get airport extreme to work, there's little(not no, just little) reason to run linux over os x

    "Little" may not be as small as some readers are thinking. Again, think non-desktop applications. For example the mini is small, quiet, and could make a good OpenBSD firewall. Do you recall all the various articles around here where people were spending lots of money to build quiet PCs for firewalls, lightweight home servers, etc? I think the base mini would be an attractive alternative. If my current firewall dies I'd consider the base mini over my an old celeron or 604e. Similar story with my home file server. It only receives lightweight use, transferring the odd file, backing up files, etc. The mini's slow hard drive wouldn't bother me. I'm currently using a mini with 10.4 for email, web, and lightweight development. I expect it will someday become my home firewall or server.

    1. Re:I'd consider Mac mini for OpenBSD firewall by AHumbleOpinion · · Score: 2, Interesting

      ... but don't you need two NIC's? where's the other one going, unless hopefully one day the airport extreme drivers become available ...

      No airport, I don't bother with wireless on desktops that already live in a heavily wired room. I would connect to the cable modem with USB 2.0 and use the ethernet for the switch. This is all theoretical, my mini is still being used as a desktop.