Slashdot Mirror


iTunes 4.9 To Support Podcasting

WaRrK writes "O'Reilly Radar are reporting that in a demo at D: All Things Digital Conference, Steve Jobs showed off iTunes 4.9, which has support for iPodder like functionality. Although, he was "slightly" dismissive of the phenomena, describing it as "Wayne's World for radio". Also, whilst currently only supporting free content, they are not ruling out paid for podcasting in the future. iTunes 4.9 should be available within 60 days." Yeah, Steve's kinda right on this - podcasting is neat & all, but the breathy overstatement of how it will change our lives is a wee bit overdone.

11 of 352 comments (clear)

  1. Editor editorials by lambent · · Score: -1, Troll

    Are the editors supposed to editorialize in article write-ups? This seems to be a very recent phenomenon.

    And no sir, I don't like it.

    As for podcasting ... I'd've thought that Apple would be all over anything that could possibly increase the usefulness of your iPod and ITMS bundle.

    iTMS 4.9: now YOU can podcast! and it washes your dog! and cleans your toilet! etc etc.

  2. Re:Reality Check by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    Am I the onlyone who read this and initially thought something along the lines of "what does Glenn Danzig have to do with Pi"?

  3. Re:That's all well and goo, but . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    What?!?

    New music got to my hard drive via:-

    1. As you say, ripping from a CD from my collection (but not using iTunes, its ripper is quite poor).

    2. By using another legitimate music store i.e. Napster/Yahoo/etc.

    3. By myself or a friend actually making some tracks

    4. By downloading some perfectly legally free music tracks

    And party shuffle, a decent enqueue system? Seriously?

    The only thing I would call that heap of shit is a mess of a random playlist, NOT in any way, shape or form a vaguely useable enqueue system.

  4. Re:Reality Check by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    Kids in a second grade class in Brunswick, Germany were asked to sum all integers from 1 to 100. That should have kept them busy for a while but some 8-year old boy - son of a peasant gardener - said in bored voice: "the result is 5050 of course, 50 times 101 ". His name was Gauss.

  5. Re:Another person doesn't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    To get a better deal from IBM. That would lower their costs and lower the prices of the Macs.

    Essentially they're shifting part of the cost burden to IBM, while keeping their share of the profits intact, in an attempt to boost their sales.

    Also, it could be an attempt to make sure that IBM, with its focus on the PS3, Xbox 360 and Nintendo Revolution, does not forget about Apple.

  6. Re:Reality Check by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    Yeah, I'm sure apple is going to release a x86 apple computer. I mean, PowerPC is not in its best moment, after all xbox 2, PS3 etc are not carrying powerpc chips. Also, a new architecture would mean no binary program for mac os x would work in a x86 computer, 3rd party companies would love such movement.

    Jobs would rather let apple die before selling a x86 mac

  7. Re:Reality Check by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    This could be the same tactic Dell uses with Intel... "We could go with AMD, but about those prices..."

    Cheaper because of Intel? I doubt it. Even if Apple does start using x86 - or more likely x86-64 - they would still likely use their own controller chips (Note that Apple uses a single, integrated controller rather than a north/southbridge approach) and custom boards.

    It's not impossible that Apple will switch to Intel processors. We already know they keep a copy of the OS up to date on Intel hardware, and even released Darwin x86. The problems come from all the things they would leave behind:

    Compatibility - The PowerPC architecture emulates x86 better than the other way 'round. To keep from eliminating all old software with one fell swoop, they would need to emulate PowerPC. This would cause old software to run like death.

    VMX - Much of Apple's current power comes from the AltiVec/VMX/Velocity Engine available on the G4 & G5 processors. It is what offers Apple serious performance benefits in certain applications, and makes possible many of the near/realtime capbilities in programs like iPhoto, iMovie, and even Final Cut Pro. Unless Intel tacks on a VMX unit, I don't see Apple switching.

    Maybe a dual-processor system: one PowerPC and one Intel? Not likely, I grant you.

  8. Re:first post... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    w00t! n0t a5 muc|-| 4s y0u|2 |)4|)|)y 5ux!!!!! 0h y3ah, te11 h1|\/| 1 w4n7 my m0|\|3y bac| f0r th4t $|-|177y |310\/\/j0|3 h3 g4\/3 my 6r4mpa l4st n1g|-|t! w00t!

  9. Your grammar makes God cry. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll
    WaRrK writes "O'Reilly Radar are reporting
    is reporting
    that in a demo at D: All Things Digital Conference, Steve Jobs showed off iTunes 4.9, which has support for iPodder like
    iPodder-like
    functionality. Although, he was "slightly" dismissive of the phenomena, describing it as "Wayne's World for radio".
    What the fuck? "However, he was slightly dismissive of the phenomenon - he described it as "Wayne's World for Radio".
    Also, whilst
    Hasn't been a word for three centuries, and when it was it didn't mean what you think it meant.
    currently only supporting free content, they are not ruling out paid for podcasting in the future. iTunes 4.9 should be available within 60 days." Yeah, Steve's kinda right on this - podcasting is neat & all, but the breathy
    "characterized or accompanied by or as if by the audible passage of breath"
    overstatement of how it will change our lives is a wee bit overdone.
    Better file this story under False Alarmsthen, no?
  10. Still Missing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    I want iAnus on the gayPod!

  11. OMG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    wtf d00d!