Posted by
Hemos
on from the circle-round-round-and-again dept.
Stack_13 writes "Wall Street Journal reports that Apple will agree to use Intel chips. Neither Apple or Intel confirm this. Interestingly, PCMag's John C. Dvorak predicted this for 2004-2005. Are even cheaper Mac Minis coming?"
Re:Does this mean -
by
Ylleks
·
· Score: 0, Redundant
Going out on a limb here: yes.
Intel was stupid!Easy hypercompatibility of Virus!
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: -1, Redundant
Why not pure Itanium-III chip (without x86-emulation-in-hw) + Pentium-M chip in one system?
In my opinion, i think that Apple doesn't want to buy slow emulator VirtualPC, he wants to buy Intel chips (Pentium-M) to port many winapplications like M$ Office, Windows Media Player, Internet Explorer,...
your absolutely correct. as professional graphic designer, who was taught on Apple systems in 1990, pagemaker was still the bomb. Macpaint, while crappy compared to photoshop 2.0, was still perfectly usable and the mouse is what made it even possible.
Slashdot Mirror
wouldn't they be better with AMD?
Going out on a limb here: yes.
In my opinion, i think that Apple doesn't want to buy slow emulator VirtualPC, he wants to buy Intel chips (Pentium-M) to port many winapplications like M$ Office, Windows Media Player, Internet Explorer, ...
open4free © : (G5 + P-M ULV + Opteron HE) three in one.
your absolutely correct. as professional graphic designer, who was taught on Apple systems in 1990, pagemaker was still the bomb. Macpaint, while crappy compared to photoshop 2.0, was still perfectly usable and the mouse is what made it even possible.
Even a broken clock is right twice a day.
I got no problem voting with my feet.