Slashdot Mirror


Layoffs at OSDL

daria42 writes "Open Source Development Labs - which employs Linus Torvalds - has apparently cut nine of its fifty-seven staff (although Linus has retained his job). The cuts come as the organisation re-structures. It will establish a European office and expand into Asia. "We're a small enough organisation that what would be a small change in focus for a bigger company has a large effect on us," said a spokesperson."

7 of 179 comments (clear)

  1. I don't know what by bigman2003 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What exactly is their income anyway? Do they have a revenue stream?

    I would be surprised if nobody donated a ton of cash, to say that they are paying Linus' salary.

    --
    No reason to lie.
  2. Probably not a big deal. by Nytewynd · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Anyone that has ever worked for a small programming shop knows this probably isn't a huge event. It sounds like of the 9 people let go, most were not programmers. They probably got rid of some sales and marketing people to prepare themselves for an investment. A lot of times to take larger amounts of venture capital, you have to clean house to prepare to take on execs from the VC firm. We had to name one of their board members our President. They also gave us a marketing guy, and sales guy. It is part of selling your soul to make money.

    Hopefully they didn't ditch anyone too integral to the programming. Also, they mentioned consulting positions, so they might have simply decided to not renew some contracts. Without the breakdown of what positions were downsized, it's hard to tell what they are doing.

    The one thing that happened to our company during this process is that some of the engineers got fed up (myself included) and left. We had about 15 people total and only 5 were programmers by the time the restructuring finished. Imagine this: 10 people telling you that we need Product X yesterday, and it gets added to your list of 10 other things that were promised to your top clients.

    --
    /. ++
  3. It already is by WindBourne · · Score: 5, Insightful

    OSS is whatever you contribute. There no real dollars chasing OSS based on where you live. It is based on how much you contribute. If you contribute a lot, you will find that HP, IBM, even OSDL would hire you.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  4. Re:Outsourced by DavidNWelton · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Europeans are, at this point, probably as or more expensive, especially considering the weak dollar.

    It's not outsourcing, it's expanding. Linux doesn't just exist in the US, you know. There are big opportunities in other parts of the world, and apparently they want to be there.

  5. Re:Outsourced ?. by MosesJones · · Score: 4, Insightful


    Or maybe it just shows how little you know about what is being developed where.

    The myth that US software developers are so much better than their Indian counterparts is just crap. And the idea that Dell support was any good when it was on shore is just plain baloney. It was rubbish then, now its rubbish and cheaper with a more dodgy accent.

    You do know of course that many of the finest mathematicians on the planet are Indian. That senior posts in many technology companies in the US are taken by Indian people, not because they are cheaper but because they are better.

    Rather than moaning, and slinging mud, about elements moving to India, wouldn't it be better to ask how come all these "superior" US developers couldn't break a 50% success rate on projects. Not so hot

    As a friend of mine said

    "We like to pretend that its India thats rubbish, in fact its pretty much everyone".

    And the worst lot are the ones who moan that the other guy is crap, while never checking out the fact that they are worse.

    --
    An Eye for an Eye will make the whole world blind - Gandhi
  6. Re:Outsourced by dan14807 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's not outsourcing, it's expanding. Linux doesn't just exist in the US, you know. There are big opportunities in other parts of the world, and apparently they want to be there.

    They are firing people in the US and replacing them with people not in the US. You could make the "expanding" argument if they weren't doing the firings. They are not "expanding". They are relocating.

  7. I can see you've never run a small company by MarkusQ · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If you need to downsize, you get rid of non-critical personnel first. Receptionist are definitely in that category, especially since they are most easily replaced out of any staff members.
    I can see you've never run a small company. If you had, you'd realize that a good (or bad) receptionist can make (or break) your business. Think about it--here is one person who typically talks to every employee several times a day, and most of your customers every week or two. The person who watchs who and what enter and leave, gets to see the unguarded moments, the body language, hear the idle gossip--in short, the best clue catcher you'll ever have.

    I'm always amazed at the money people will pay consultants for clues they could have gotten in far less time just by asking the recptionist. Often, the receptionist is the only person in the whole outfit that sees the big picture.

    --MarkusQ