Slashdot Mirror


Official BitTorrent Search Opens

starrsoft writes "The official BitTorrent search has debuted. The search engine was built by BT inventor Bram Cohen. The question? Will he get sued? The BT search seems to be down right now. (It'll really be down after this story is posted...) Spiegel has more (En): "Naturally other sites such as Bitoogle, Isohunt, SuprNova or Torrentspy have tried before, but either they became fast a goal of legal attacks on the part of the industry or they furnished rather durchwachsene [??] results. BitTorrent search however proves with first tests [that it is] as...Google...fast. The results come from a large number [of] more well-known and unknown... sites, and...permits sufficient restricting to the inquiry, in order to obtain really relevant results.""

10 of 309 comments (clear)

  1. Speedy by AKAImBatman · · Score: 5, Informative

    BitTorrent search however proves with first tests [that it is] as...Google...fast.

    So fast that the browser times out on a search for "mozilla". Hopefully they'll get those kinks worked out soon. :-/

    Bandwidth generously provided by Hot or Not

    That explains everything. ;-)

    Will he get sued?

    I still think that anyone trying to sue Bittorrent or a generic search engine would have a hard time of it. Bittorrent has so many legal uses that it just isn't funny. Here's some example of legal torrents:

    Privateer Remake
    OpenOffice
    Star Trek: New Voyages (legal fan made)
    FreeBSD
    Star Wars: Revelations (legal fan made)
    Xandros Free Edition
    Mozilla Firefox
    Doom 3 Demo
    America's Army (now for Linux and OSX)

    I could go on, but I think you get the point.

    1. Re:Speedy by Anonymous+Custard · · Score: 4, Informative

      Blizzard's World of Warcraft game uses a bittorrent-like p2p download system for all its large patches.

    2. Re:Speedy by AKAImBatman · · Score: 4, Informative

      I'm interested to see what is and isn't worthy of a lawsuit. This search engine is now three steps removed from the (assumed) copyright infringement.

      The judge in the Napster case defined the litmus test that has been used by successive generations of P2P software. His decision is also what got Kazza off the hook.

      As I understand the case, the judge said that a technology would be legal if it was demonstratably useful and intended for legal purposes. Napster failed that test, because there simply wasn't an existing base of legal music files at the time. Kazza succeeded because it was able to show that its design allowed for any type of file regardless of legality.

      Similarly, this search engine should be legal as long as it stays within the bounds of a generic service. If it starts favoring particular sites, then the owners are going to be in trouble. Also note that the owners of the search engine will need to promptly remove any links requested by someone claiming a copyright, in order to sustain carrier status under the DMCA.

      It will (presumably) tell users where to get information (.torrent files and their associated trackers) on where to get copyrighted content. Is this enough for a case?

      Definitely not. Distributing copyrighted material is not illegal. Illegally distributing copyrighted material is illegal. I realize most people around here don't catch the distinction, so I'll attempt to explain.

      You see, when the Mozilla Foundation produces a release of FireFox they have an automatic copyright on their work. That copyright gives them the sole control over its redistribution. In MF's case, they decide to freely allow for BitTorrent distribution and redistribution. That is their right as a copyright holder. However, when George Lucas produced Star Wars III he chose to only allow for distribution to theaters under a royalty agreement. Redistribution is not permitted (except for perhaps companies who create film copies on behalf of Lucas) and thus is illegal if found on a P2P network.

    3. Re:Speedy by AKAImBatman · · Score: 3, Informative

      A fan-produced Star Trek movie is definitely not legal.

      Have you been to their site? They have explicit permission to create these episodes. In general, Paramount has stated that they don't mind too much as long as no one is making money off of their trademarks. Same thing with the Star Wars film. George Lucas has given quite a bit of leeway to fans in creating works based on his universe.

      I'm 99.5% certain of the legality of all the torrents I've linked to. Even in the (extremely slim) chance that one of them is contested by a trademark or copyright holder, that's for the otherwise upstanding distribution sites to sort out.

  2. Durchwachsen by slavemowgli · · Score: 5, Informative

    "durchwachsen" means "marbled" or "streaky" when applied to meat, but can also be used figuratively, meaning "mixed", "so-so" etc.

    --
    quidquid latine dictum sit altum videtur.
  3. Read the ToS by Turn-X+Alphonse · · Score: 5, Informative

    Look at the ToS, it has some.. intresting stuff.

    2. Online Conduct

    You agree that you will not use the Site or the Services:

    * to develop, generate, upload, post, display, transmit, disseminate or store information that: (A) infringes any third party's intellectual property or other proprietary rights, including, but not limited to, using third party copyrighted materials, without appropriate permission, using third party trademarks without appropriate permission or attribution, or using or distributing third party information (whether or not protected as a trade secret) in violation of a duty of confidentiality or otherwise; (B) is or, in BitTorrent's sole discretion, would have the tendency to be, defamatory, libelous, harassing, pornographic, an invasion of privacy, obscene, abusive, illegal, racist, offensive or harmful or otherwise objectionable; (C) constitutes unsolicited promotions, advertising or solicitations for funds, good or services, including junk mail and spam; (D) otherwise violates this Terms of Service in any way; or (E) obstructs or otherwise interferes with the normal performance of another person's use of the Sites or the Services;


    Seems they are covering a few legal holes.. but will it stand against RIAA/MPAA's pack of lawyers?

    --
    I like muppets.
  4. Just use google? by Rolozo · · Score: 3, Informative

    You can always append filetype:torrent to your google searches. For example:

    http://www.google.com/search?q=filetype%3Atorrent+ ubuntu

    --
    Ryan
  5. Firefox Seach Plugin by g-san · · Score: 4, Informative

    God damn thats good service. It's already available. Kudos to Chad Walstrom! Click on File Sharing here.

    We have a new expression: zero-day features!

  6. Owner of torrent website was just arrested by John+Seminal · · Score: 3, Informative
    http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/crime_starwars_dc

    The Elite Torrents network, found online at www.elitetorrents.org, relied on a technology called BitTorrent that allows users to quickly download digital movies and other large files by copying them from many computers at once.

    The network signed up 133,000 members who collectively downloaded 2.1 million files, according to the Immigration and Customs Enforcement division of the Homeland Security Department.

    Visitors to the Web site on Wednesday saw a notice that read, "This site has been permanently shut down by the Federal Bureau of Investigation and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement."

    What makes this so amazing is, this was not shut down because the RIAA sued, or because they made threats. The FBI raided the house, arrested the owner, and shut the website down. I wonder what the FBI will do with the server logs??

    This has to be the dumbest waste of taxpayer money ever. Lets go after places that share music and tv shows.

    --

    Rosco: "If brains were gunpowder, Enos couldn't blow his nose."

  7. Re:BitTorrent.com is also using filetype:torrent! by moonbender · · Score: 3, Informative

    That javascript isn't ever refered to in the body of the page. It's never called. At least not as far as I can see. The form certainly doesn't. Maybe it's an artifact of the development or something.

    --
    Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.