Slashdot Mirror


A Private GSM Cell?

mr number two asks: "I live in the mountains and have poor GSM reception. I can buy an active repeater to boost signal strength in my home to good levels, but what I'd really like to do is have a private GSM picocell, such that at home I would be connected to my own PBX. Calls to my home phone number would ring through to my cell phone. I wouldn't have to worry about a home cordless phone (and 802.11 interference) and I'd have all my speed dialing / contacts info right there. There are many other benefits. Ignoring FCC licensing issues, is there a base station I can purchase which has a signalling interface that will interface to a small PBX?"

78 comments

  1. dual purpose phones by techmeltz · · Score: 1

    I've heard about cell phones that have a base station that plugs into your home phone line to give you access to both when at home... do those do the trick?

    --
    [This space for rent]
  2. Heres a GSM to VOIP gateway by madstork2000 · · Score: 4, Informative

    This looks like it might be helpful:

    http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-VOIP+GSM+Gateways

    The site www.voip-info.org itself looked promising during my brief visit....

    1. Re:Heres a GSM to VOIP gateway by gregmac · · Score: 4, Informative

      That's backwards from what he's asking for - that essentially acts as a cell phone, and makes it available using VoIP. Effectively, if you had an asterisk box, you could have your cell phone number ring into it or use it to make outbound calls, which would be useful in remote locations with no phone lines, or probably even more useful as an emergency backup in the event regular phone lines go down.

      The original question is asking for a way to use his cellphone as an extension on the PBX, so this wouldn't be useful in that situation.

      --
      Speak before you think
    2. Re:Heres a GSM to VOIP gateway by Intron · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think what you want is a cell phone that switches to VOIP when in range of your wi-fi spot. Obviously, the major carriers have little incentive to offer this.

      --
      Intron: the portion of DNA which expresses nothing useful.
  3. do you have broadband? by squarefish · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I use vonage and have the simulring feature turned on to ring my cell at the same time- then I have my cell set to forward after a set time back to the main number- this is awesome because all my numbers now ring to all my phones and since vonage has free incoming calls and the cell doesn't, I can manage my time with both plans more easily. All calls also end up in the same voicemail box with the vonage account and then that emails the message to me so I never have to check it manually.
    This system has worked amazingly well for me for the last couple months and it's eliminated all the issues I used to have with other landlines.
    good luck!!!

    --
    Creationists are a lot like zombies. Slow, but powerful and numerous. And they all want to eat our brains.
    1. Re:do you have broadband? by ruppy88 · · Score: 1

      WTF. Wouldn't this just create an endless loop? If you send the vonage to the cell and then the cell back to the vonage, when does the voicemail kick in???

    2. Re:do you have broadband? by squarefish · · Score: 1

      nope, no endless loop. the main vonage # doesn't forward- it simultaniously rings and then the cell forwards back to the main # after somany seconds- the main # does not consider this a new call and it's timed to go into the vonage voicemail at that point. This does everything I want without a pbx- that's why I recommend it. I'm not certain how it works so perfectly, but it does.

      --
      Creationists are a lot like zombies. Slow, but powerful and numerous. And they all want to eat our brains.
  4. Ignoring FCC rules? by whib · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Sure, there are many, many options, if you are willing to ignore the rules.......

    Everything is available for a price.

    On the other hand, I might suggest searching for a solution that does not ignore the rules. Rules for communication systems are (for the most part) fairly sane. The avoid pesky things such as cross talk, interference, etc. But hey, this is Slash, who really cares about that kind of thing ;)

    --
    -- www.WhereHaveIBeen.com
    1. Re:Ignoring FCC rules? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I assume he meant that he intends to consult with a Lawyer about legal issues rather than get a bunch of Anon Cowards and whib's giving him legal advice instead of technical advice which was the reason for which he came here.

  5. Check with Tessco by JohnnyGTO · · Score: 2, Informative

    they seem to sell alot of different equipment. www.tessco.com

    --
    Si vis pacem, para bellum! For evil to succeed good men need only do nothing!
  6. Pipe dream by ADRA · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Don't waste your time.

    The SIN card you have in your phone is tied to your provider. The provider paid millions/billions to license a GSM band in the US.

    The technology that actually powers this is inhibitivly expensive. If you wanted to hack your own non-rules based GSM station, then you'll have to worry about the FCC and anyone else not liking you break the law.

    It'd be more feasible to hack in a second antenna, talk circuit into your cell. I don't see it being easy even on bulky phones, but its possible.

    --
    Bye!
    1. Re:Pipe dream by DetrimentalFiend · · Score: 1

      It's SIM, but whatever. For the most part you're right.

    2. Re:Pipe dream by BillX · · Score: 1


      Don't waste your time.

      The SIN card you have in your phone is tied to your provider.


      Really? I didn't know that place in the cellphone business too (although looking at the contract again it doesn't surprise me). How's the thermal insulation on these cards?

      --
      Caveat Emptor is not a business model.
    3. Re:Pipe dream by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They come in the three standard temperature ranges:

      Commercial (0degC ~ 70degC)
      Industrial (-40degC ~ 80degC)
      Infernal (125degC ~ 1000degC)

  7. how about a long range cordless phone by sevinkey · · Score: 1

    There's a lot of models that are similar to cell phones, and many have ranges of up to 30 miles.

    Here's an example.
    http://www.4cellular.com/cordless/

    Googling for cordless phone long range returned a lot of results.

    1. Re:how about a long range cordless phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      And they are all massively illegal in the US.

  8. Cingular by Down8 · · Score: 1

    Cingular used to sell an item that did this exact thing. I'd start there.

    -bZj

    --
    .sig
  9. You got the necessary huge sack of money then? by Tiersten · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Sure. You can do what you want but the hardware is incredibly expensive and you'd need a license to operate as a telecoms provider which also is incredibly expensive. If you're looking for a way to reduce your cell phone bills then this isn't it.

    Since you're going to be operating a transmitter it's not going to be too hard to find out where that rogue cell signal is coming from either.

    Don't think that they won't notice because you're up in the moutains. People are employed to drive around with a pile equipement and do site surveys. There was an article with pics about it recently.

  10. Cordless Phone interference ? by MerlynEmrys67 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Why in the H*** would a computer geek even consider buying a cordless phone in the 802.11 frequency range.

    There are two options, either of which avoids the problem, either 900Mhz or 5Ghz (you weren't planning on deploying 802.11a were you ?)

    Please tell me you didn't go out and buy the coolest phone a few years back in the 2.4Ghz range, and now aren't willing to "upgrade" to a 5Ghz phone.

    --
    I have mod points and I am not afraid to use them
    1. Re:Cordless Phone interference ? by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 1

      900mhz interferes with Proxim wireless. I can't give up wireless Apple Newton, not after finally making it work.

    2. Re:Cordless Phone interference ? by Jahf · · Score: 2, Informative

      -good- 2.4GHz phones (a'la Siemens Gigasets) don't interfere with 802.11b/g/n/whatever.

      And 5GHz phones have a tendency to not work as well (for me) through my house due to solid construction.

      My microwave interferes with my phone, but neither interferes with my wireless.

      Crappy 2.4GHz phones (a'la Panasonic) do, but that doesn't mean they all do.

      --
      It is more productive to voice thoughtful opinions (reply) than to judge (moderate) others.
    3. Re:Cordless Phone interference ? by Kymermosst · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Why in the H*** would a computer geek even consider buying a cordless phone in the 802.11 frequency range.

      There are two options, either of which avoids the problem, either 900Mhz or 5Ghz (you weren't planning on deploying 802.11a were you ?)

      Please tell me you didn't go out and buy the coolest phone a few years back in the 2.4Ghz range, and now aren't willing to "upgrade" to a 5Ghz phone.


      Make sure you take a look at your 5 GHz phone's spec sheet before purchasing.

      Many "5.8 GHz" phones I have seen transmit from the phone to the base station on 5 GHz, and the base station to the phone at 2.4 GHz. (It might be the other way around, but you get the idea). If WiFi interference is your concern, many supposed 5 GHz phones are no comfort.

      Panasonic FHSS "GigaRange" phones seem to be one of the ones that go 5.8 both ways, but they are not inexpensive.

      I just stick with a 900 MHz phone. It even has dual handsets and was... $25 at Sears.

      --
      "Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives" should be a convenience store, not a government agency.
    4. Re:Cordless Phone interference ? by mikefe · · Score: 1

      Many "5.8 GHz" phones I have seen transmit from the phone to the base station on 5 GHz, and the base station to the phone at 2.4 GHz. (It might be the other way around, but you get the idea). If WiFi interference is your concern, many supposed 5 GHz phones are no comfort.

      Most likely it is 5Ghz from the base station to the handset and 2.4Ghz from the handset to the base station.

      The base station has to use more power to get the signal to go through walls at 5Ghz and they use 2.4Ghz from the handset to extend the battery life.

      Not to mention the concerns about radiation from the handsets going into the brain... So the less power coming from the handset the better.

      --
      There: Something at a specific location.
      Their: Owned by someone.
      Please make sure your english compiles.
  11. Cell, or Network? by poindextrose · · Score: 5, Informative

    Administering a wireless telecommunications switch, I have to ask: do you want a network of your own with no ties to other carriers, or just a cell?

    If you're looking for a "just you" thing, good luck. The GSM standards are pretty easy to get your hands on, and with a little ingenuity, you could build a GSM switch. It's basically a few DBs and hardware interfaces. That's where things get tricky. GSM cells (which you could easily purchase for $100,000 (CDN)) need to communicate to the switch using a standardized protocol over T1. So you'd have to build THAT network stack over some sort of Frame-Relay-over-T1 interface (which are often rather expensive in and of themselves... also, good luck with Linux drivers...).

    I left out the possibility of buying a GSM switch, because I doubt you'd be on Ask Slashdot if you had that kind of cash.

    Now I know you said "apart from FCC regulations" or something, but that's what's going to kill you. GSM uses a 200KHz carrier (at least with the 800 and 900 MHz spectrum), and to put a site on the air with any sort of wattage in any location of any use (you are in rough terrain, no? So you'd put in on a peak... and spread your signal pretty far) without interfering with anyone else and without the FCC turning your way is going to be quite tricky.

    --
    Karma: Raspberry Kiwi
    1. Re:Cell, or Network? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Huh? 800Mhz and 900Mhz *are* the carriers. 200Khz would either be a figment of your imagination or a subcarrier. Subcarriers don't propagate separately from their carriers.

    2. Re:Cell, or Network? by poindextrose · · Score: 1
      Umm... 800MHz and 900MHz are bands... within each band resides spectrum. Carriers use spectrum.

      So, let's say, I could have a 200KHz wide carrier centered at, say, 937.9725MHz. That would be a 200KHz carrier in the 900MHz band.

      Subcarriers don't propagate separately from their carriers.
      Get me some of the crack you're smoking, because in no universe does that make sense in the given context.

      Oooooohh... I get it. You're a 'troll', right? You're just making up stuff to insult other people with, posting as AC because you don't really want anyone to know you're actually a moron. Let me be the first to say: you make no sense and don't know what you're talking about.

      Let me also be the first to say that the symbol for 'hertz' is not 'hz'. It's 'Hz'. What on earth is a 'henry z'?
      --
      Karma: Raspberry Kiwi
    3. Re:Cell, or Network? by hjf · · Score: 1
      GSM cells (which you could easily purchase for $100,000 (CDN)
      so that's like US $ 2?
    4. Re:Cell, or Network? by dnnrly · · Score: 1
      While I applaud any attempt by a private individual to write their own GSM stack, I would like to point out a few things (based on personal experience of writing software for GSM devices):
      • There are a LOT of documents to download! Several hundred!
      • Some of these documents are BIG! The spec covering the communication between the different layers of the protocol stack on a device alone comes to well over 1000 pages. There are several more specs like that lying around.
      • These specs are written in a language that is only loosely based on English. By this I mean that many hundreds of people have been involved writing these specs (some of whom do not speak English as their first language), there has been a lot of 'fudging' to cover up where some specs have been written at the same time but vitally depend on information contained in each other, and most of the authors a engineers - not writers.
      • If you were thinking of implementing only a small subset of the features, you've still got to trawl through the relevant specs finding even the most basic information.


      Just remember this; I saw a project that took 30 people almost 2 years to design and implement a GSM stack (based on some previous work). This was considered amazingly fast at the time!
  12. This topic reminds me... by nekoniku · · Score: 5, Funny

    I have a problem with mosquitoes in my yard and I wonder if anyone has some good advice on the best kind of cannon and ammo I should get to shoot them down?

    --
    "It's a wonderful idea. But it doesn't work." -- Tad Danielewski
    1. Re:This topic reminds me... by photon317 · · Score: 1


      I would recommend a Barrett .50 Caliber rifle for mosquitos, especially if you're in Texas.

      --
      11*43+456^2
  13. Google to the resuce, once again by c0d3h4x0r · · Score: 0
    --
    Moderator hint: a comment is neither "Flamebait" nor "Troll" if it is true.
    1. Re:Google to the resuce, once again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, you've certainly turned up a wonderful array of glossaries! How useful.

  14. A different kind of cell by lbmouse · · Score: 3, Funny

    Ignoring FCC licensing issues

    That could get you a 6 x 9 cell with a roommate.

    1. Re:A different kind of cell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      it probably won't get you jail time, but if caught, you'll get a massive fine. even worse, there will probably be a team of fbi/federal marshalls kicking in your door and confiscating all your shit.

    2. Re:A different kind of cell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm happy with them confiscating all my shit if it means I don't need to spend some quality time alone with my cellmate who gets a bit "lonely"

  15. Ask your provider by bluGill · · Score: 1

    Odds are you can't do anything yourself (FCC). However your provider can. Complain that you don't have strong service and they might put a new tower up in your area. Depending on how much money you have to spend they might allow you to connect your VOIP network.

    1. Re:Ask your provider by TubeSteak · · Score: 1
      HA

      you're kidding right?

      Once you've heard the words:
      "No we don't have towers in that area and don't have plans to put one up
      you'll realise how hilarious your suggestion is

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    2. Re:Ask your provider by bluGill · · Score: 1

      Actually no. They do take customer input on where to put towers. It takes a year to install one, and they might decide not to put one up. If you don't ask for it though, they will never know you want it. If there is demand in one area and none in a different, they fill the demand. If there is a tower that nobody uses it is a waste to put it up.

      Not to mention there is always some rich fool who can afford a hostile take over of a cell phone company just to force a tower in that area.

    3. Re:Ask your provider by nxtw · · Score: 1
      Of course they take customer input on tower placment. But they're more inclined to place towers where they need it the most e.g. the most cutomers will be satisfied -- like near the brand new housing development or that annoying spot on the freeway where calls always drop. The middle of nowhere comes last, unless there's a lot of new development or a nice expressway there.

      and as for "some rich fool" -- get real. most of the big us cell companies are wholly owned subsidaries of much larger corporations.

  16. Two easiest options by angle_slam · · Score: 1
    1. Move out of the mountains
    2. Switch to CDMA (Verizon).
    1. Re:Two easiest options by amliebsch · · Score: 1

      3. Use a satellite phone?

      http://www.iridium.com/

      --
      If you don't know where you are going, you will wind up somewhere else.
    2. Re:Two easiest options by damsa · · Score: 1

      4. Carrier pigeons 5. Smoke signals

    3. Re:Two easiest options by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      6. Profit

    4. Re:Two easiest options by hjf · · Score: 1

      6 ...
      7. PROFIT!

  17. Easy by Richard_at_work · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Speak to a GSM network providor, like Vodaphone, Orange, O2 or something (to give UK examples). All of these providors will sell you a local cell unit, its a service they provide to companies with large sites or campuses, to use mobile phones instead of DECT phones across a wide area with automatic roaming off site. Calls within the same cell are free, with a annual rental, and calls off the local cell are charged at the standard airtime rate, and the bonus is that its just a normal mobile cell.

  18. I know in Europe by nilbog · · Score: 0

    They already offer voip wireless basestations. The handsets are cell phones that automagically connect to your wifi when you're close enough, or connect through your cell carrier when you're away. Haven't seen anything like this in the US yet.

    --
    or else!
  19. You're pretty much screwed by buttfuckinpimpnugget · · Score: 0

    You can buy a small bts (base station transceiver) but that is only half of it. A bts is not designed to connect to the pstn. You would still need a GSM switch. Nortel makes what they call an e-cell which is meant for small buildings or inside malls. It costs $30,000. You are probably better off using WiFi or something like this.

  20. Back to the original problem by Drew+M. · · Score: 1

    Focusing on the original problem of "my cell phone gets bad reception in my house on the mountain" why not purchase a phone that is known for really good reception?

    I bought a Nokia phone specifically for it's reception abilities, and I've had many people on the same wireless carrier that couldn't use their phone in places that I could.

    Pick up a Nokia 6010 (basic phone) or 6230 (if you need all the features) and see if that fixes your problem.

    Why fix the problem with a few hundred thousand dollars when a $100 solution would work.

    1. Re:Back to the original problem by nxtw · · Score: 1
      while those phones are better than some others, they tend to only make a dramatic improvment when coverage in many areas is at a point in between the provider's minimum RSSI (-105 or -110dBm on the 1900MHz GSM networks here) and where other phones can no longer work reliably. this tends to be T-Mobile USA's GSM networks. you can't magically take a -112dBm signal and make it work with another standard gsm phone.

      also, a lot of the supposed "improvment" may have to do with the psychological effect of different thresholds for dropping calls, showing signal strength, and losing paging signals. while some phones are exceptionally bad, and a few are exceptionally good, the good ones aren't *that* much better than the average phones. and the *bad* ones usually aren't either, as providers try not to sell bad products.

  21. +"cell phone" +yagi .... line of sight antenna by ankhank · · Score: 1

    Yagi Antenna [8 Elements] for Cell Phone Frequencies 806-896 Mhz / 870-960 Mhz
    Availability: Usually ships the same business day.

    all Cellular and GSM phones excluding PCS phones
    US $49.95

  22. cordless phone, 10 mile range by jago25_98 · · Score: 1

    Perhaps the answer was on slashdot the other day.

    It was a cordless phone with something like a 10 mile range.

  23. simulInbox? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    I've also got Vonage simulring (love it), but the (Sprint/Treo600) mobile voicemail catches half the calls. How do I set the mobile account to send calls back to Vonage, without triggering another simulring, so the mobile voicemail never gets activated?

    Also, any ideas on how to get Evolution to trigger a script, on receipt of the Vonage voicemail notification email, that sends an SMS to the Treo? With a speeddial hotbutton, or maybe a URL pointing to the Vonage WAV, closing that loop might put me into a single "Inbox" for all my messaging. What do you think?

    Also, fuck the South!

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:simulInbox? by squarefish · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure what the evolution you're referring to is, but here's the setup I use and I think it doesn't trigger another simulring because it's probably giving a busy tone at the time, which would kill the cell call right when vonage is switching to voicemail- I would need to test this with a third separate phone. vonage is set for 15 seconsd delay before hitting voicemail and simulring is turned on. on my cell (nokia 3650) I have several forward options and the one I'm using is called 'if not answered' and it's set to forward back to my main # after 10 seconds. this setup has worked flawlessly for me and all voicemail ends up with vonage. I would guess that you could setup spamassassin or sendmail to somehow filter for vonage voicemail messages and then sms you through that somehow- is that what you want evolution for?

      --
      Creationists are a lot like zombies. Slow, but powerful and numerous. And they all want to eat our brains.
    2. Re:simulInbox? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Ah, your Nokia (or is it your carrier? Which one?) has an option to forward an incoming cell call without going to voicemail. That's the essential link. If my phone or carrier has that, I can try it - I'll see.

      BTW, Evolution is the MUA (email client) in the GNOME desktop that I use. It has message filtering, probably able to trigger an arbitrary script that could send SMS to my phone. Or, as you point out, I could get my MTA (like sendmail) to trap the message, and call an SMS-send script.

      Thanks for the tip.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    3. Re:simulInbox? by squarefish · · Score: 1

      it's the forward menu in the phone software itself. I use t-mobile for service. I just tested the system with another outside line and it's not in fact getting a busy, so I'm not positive why it doesn't loop, but it doesn't. yeah, the phone forwards after 10 seconds, before it would hit the service providers voicemail. I don't use gnome, but it sounds cool- I may try this later with sendmail.

      --
      Creationists are a lot like zombies. Slow, but powerful and numerous. And they all want to eat our brains.
  24. DECT by Kris_J · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure, but I think there are some mobile phones that support a 900MHz standard called DECT. It basically a cordless phone standard that allows mobile phones to switch to (cheaper) land-line connections where available. I think.

  25. My next Ask Slashdot submission... by biglig2 · · Score: 3, Funny

    "Hi! I live in a cave and have voices in my head telling me to kill people. I can pay my local prostitute to feign death, but what I'd really like to do is have a private basement pit, such that at home I would be able to do my murders undisturbed. I wouldn't have to worry about getting blood over my slacks, and I'd have all my brain-sized stewing pots right there. There are many other benefits. Ignoring local anti-murder laws, is there a particular type of teen hitch-hiker it's better to prey on?"

    --
    ~~~~~ BigLig2? You mean there's another one of me?
  26. Why are you set on GSM? by fred+fleenblat · · Score: 1

    Depending on geography and tower placement, you might be able to get a decent signal with a CDMA, PCS or AMPS phone...

    Borrow phones from friends and make some test calls to see how they do. I wouldn't just go by number of bars.

    Other possibility is to rig up a directional antennna and plug your phone into that (assuming it has an aux antenna jack). You won't be able to walk around the house and talk, but at least you'll have service.

    1. Re:Why are you set on GSM? by eobanb · · Score: 1

      I can back this up. I have a Motorola DPC mobile from 1992 or so, and it uses AMPS. The thing is built like a tank (although it's basically the size of your average cordless phone, so no worries there), and the signal it puts out, something around 5 watts, is almost invincible. In a cinder-block building that's halfway underground in the middle of Indiana, my (GSM) Cingular phone dies. So does my friend's Nextel. And another friend's (CDMA) Verizon. The AMPS is clear as a bell.

      --

      Take off every sig. For great justice.

    2. Re:Why are you set on GSM? by man_ls · · Score: 1

      Pumping 5W of near-microwave RF into your skull probably *is* a good way to mess things up, even if the 250mW of a normal cell phone aren't very dangerous.

  27. T-Mobile is rumored to offer in-home VoIP service by kriston · · Score: 2, Insightful

    T-Mobile has been rumored to offer in-home VoIP service in the fall of 2005. It wouldn't be legal for you to run your own "picocell" as the GSM frequencies are licensed, even in those picocells that the carriers deploy in malls and sporting events.

    T-Mobile's rumored new service will utilize a new class of mobile phones which are GSM and WiFi hybrids. While you are away from home the handset works like a normal GSM phone. When you get home the handset switches to WiFi and connects calls using a wireless VoIP gateway that you connect to your high-speed internet connection. T-Mobile will bundle the hybrig GSM+WiFi mobile phone, the WiFi VoIP gateway device, and the VoIP service. To the mobile phone user the only thing they notice is that their T-Mobile phone works at home and they can finally drop that PSTN line.

    This is in response to the overwhelming T-Mobile customers who tried to use number portability to switch their home phone numbers to T-Mobile and found that their mobile phone didn't work in their homes. Most of T-Mobile's spectrum is 1900 MHz which doesn't penetrate well into buildings. At the same time, T-Mobile (and the other carriers) were spending billions to acquire space in the 800 MHz spectrum to try to improve the situation but someone had the bright idea for T-Mobile to offer all-in-one GSM+VoIP service for much less money than building out their mobile GSM networks which already work really well outdoors.

    I think it's a brilliant plan and it's much cheaper than giving everyone GSM repeaters at $500-$1200 per unit just so their mobile phones will work in the house (but never the basement)... of course the hybrid GSM+WiFi phone *will* work in the basement. It's simply brilliant.

    Let's see if they really roll this service out.

    --

    Kriston

  28. Re:+"cell phone" +yagi .... line of sight antenna by kriston · · Score: 1

    Umm, no, this device will not help you in the USA. Most GSM providers in the USA have GSM only in the ~1900 MHz range with some tiny amounts of GSM coverage in the ~850 MHz range. Cingular is desperately rushing to replace the analog cellular and digital TDMA networks in the ~850 MHz spectrum with GSM (their current phones already try to find a GSM signal there, but very few of them will work in analog, and only one of them will work in TDMA). Unfortunately for Cingular the FCC is mandating analog cellular to stay online at least until 2007 and TDMA to stay online even longer--its deadline recently extended to 2008.

    T-Mobile has very localized ~850 MHz coverage in some markets where thousands of customers could get not service, like large residential areas and major highway interchanges. At least they're trying. This device you speak of won't work for T-Mobile, either.

    Kris

    --

    Kriston

  29. GSM home base station exists, unreleased by Rock-n-Rolf · · Score: 1

    I know that a big nordic telecommunications company had a so called home base station developed a couple of years ago and has it ready in the cupboard. However they decided regulatory barriers to be too high and didn't launch it as a product.

    --
    In Korea, all your base are Only For Old People
  30. Re:+"cell phone" +yagi .... line of sight antenna by ankhank · · Score: 1

    hmmm, I'm working (Verizon, in N. Ca.) from a mountainside that's line of sight about 20 miles to the nearest cell tower; used to get only analog, now can get digital. If I go five hundred feet downhill, I'm in the shadow of the surrounding mountains and have no cell connection til I drive out past them. This is with just the handheld antenna.

    I had been using an old analog-only dual-mode Nokia phone but recently switched to a Kyocera 6036 (Palm PDA plus tri-mode handset) so I've been looking for a signal booster myself that works for tri-mode. I note there are signal booster amplifiers, as well as external antennas, claimed to work for distant weak signal sites.

    You do need to know exactly what kind of antenna works with your phone -- Kris obviously knows much more specifically what you need. Maybe you can get an exact specification and then search.

    I'd be surprised if no external antenna is possible for you, if you can stand having to plug your phone in up on your mountain site.

    Watch out for lightning storms though.

    Maybe this one?

    YAGI AND PANEL CELLULAR / PCS ANTENNAS

    These low-cost antennas can improve your signal strength drastically. Installed on poles, the antenna points in the direction of the cellular tower. The antenna can be rotated on the pole until the connected cell phone obtains the maximum signal. These antennas can be combined with our signal booster amplifier product for maximum range.

    Products include the CAY807 Yagi antenna, which features four-element Yagi with 7dB (9dBi) directional gain and can withstand 125mph winds, and the CAY1912 PCS panel antenna - a high quality, completely enclosed 11dB (13dBi) gain panel antenna for 1,850MHz to 1,990MHz.

  31. Buy a used COW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cell On Wheels. A number of companies sell them. The descriptions for some of them seem to be aimed at private networks.

  32. Re:T-Mobile is rumored to offer in-home VoIP servi by nxtw · · Score: 1
    So instead of actually building a decent network, they'll just make a VoIP service.

    Great strategy.

  33. Re:T-Mobile is rumored to offer in-home VoIP servi by kriston · · Score: 1
    I have mixed feelings about that. As with many new technologies the marketing oversells the technology so incredibly more than the existing or near-future technology can ever accomplish. Todays' mobile phone networks were designed as mobile phone networks. Now people are being told that yes, indeed, you can take your "mobile" phone and use it in your non-mobile dwelling.

    The CEO of Verizon said this very thing earlier this spring. T-Mobile has been saying this all along and recognizes the practicality of mobile phones in dwellings (it does not work) and is rumored to offer a real solution that will really work.

    I don't know about where you live and work but when I walk outside my mobile phone gets nearly 100% signal compared to 10-50% signal inside. This is the same with my T-Mobile, Verizon, Cingular handsets, and two out of three use different towers in the areas I live and work.

    --

    Kriston

  34. Re:+"cell phone" +yagi .... line of sight antenna by kriston · · Score: 1
    Another poster mentioned a place that sells mobile phone repeaters which may address the problem originally asked. These are virtually the same as the repeaters used by very early analog cellular car phone handsets (the ones that passively transmit the signal through glass to an external antenna) but are specifically designed for both ~850 MHz and ~1900 MHz mobile phones. Most of these repeaters work with all GSM and CDMA providers in the USA, but most of those do not work with Nextel. I was thinking of getting one for my house. These are legal and will fit the bill the original poster asked.


    One thing to be careful of. These repeaters always use omnidirectional antennas (not uniderectional Yagis). If you are a CDMA customer (Verizon and Sprint in the USA) the provider will shut you down if you use a Yagi. The principle of CDMA is that all phones are balanced to the same signal strength. CDMA phones all transmit on the same frequencies at the same time and the tower will command your phone to reduce signal if it drowns out other customers. If your phone reduces its signal but is still too strong, the Verizon "Can you hear me now?" guy will find you and shut you down.


    GSM is more forgiving to Yagi users but they still do not like it.


    Keep the omnidirectional antenna the repeater set came with and you won't get in trouble. The vendor the other poster mentioned sells repeaters that are not only approved by the mobile phone providers but are also used by the mobile phone providers.


    Keep in mind that I'm not describing a picocell or microcell, merely a local mobile phone repeater unit.


    --

    Kriston

  35. Re:T-Mobile is rumored to offer in-home VoIP servi by nxtw · · Score: 1
    "almost 100% signal" to "10-50% signal"? that's as unambiguous as "shot by a nerf dart" to "shot by a bullet".

    first, the bars on your phone do not correlate to 100% signal to 10-50% signal. they often measure certain amounts of signal strength, ignoring issues like the actual quality of the signal.

    a good cellular network should be accessible inside most buildings. otherwise, the network is poor. while some buildings *are* wireless-unfriendly, the issue is more often than not simply a poor network, and there's no reason my cellphone shouldn't work at wal-mart, all along the expressway, in the middle of a suburban neighborhood, etc.

    i have 5/5 bars inside at home on T-Mobile. i have 5/5 bars at work on AT&T Wireless. i have 5/5 bars at school on Cingular. T-Mobile works at home and work, Cingular works at home and school, and AT&T works at work and school. had any one of those providers paid to add more cell sites at the right places, i'd have perfect coverage on one of them. instead, i have to switch between them in order to keep my phone working. but it *does* work everywhere i go -- on at least one of the providers. (AT&T works at the most places, but they don't do well around here.)

    on my phone, 5 bars is -84dBm and greater. ~100ft away from a tower, my phone has read -43dBm (the highest I've ever seen on it.) the 1900MHz GSM networks here, once again, have a min RSSI (minimum signal strength) at -105dBm or -110dBm, so there can be a huge difference between different values of "5 bars".

  36. picocell by giannandrea · · Score: 1
    You are describing a standalone GSM picocell e.g.
    http://www.ipaccess.com/ipaccess_2004_pages/bts.ht ml
    http://www.rivanetworks.com/nano/nano.htm

    To operate one legaly you would presumably need to get an FCC experimental license for limited power output, or permission from an existing carrier.

    One problem with most picocells or microcells is that they are designed to talk to the rest of a GSM network (billing and provisioning systems) and cant really be attached to a simple POTS or PRI line.

    A personal GSM/VoIP gateway is one of those problems that has to get solved eventually though...

  37. Re:T-Mobile is rumored to offer in-home VoIP servi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This has a basic description of the technology: http://www.umatechnology.org/technology/

  38. Re:T-Mobile is rumored to offer in-home VoIP servi by kriston · · Score: 1

    Thanks for playing, but I never said anything about "bars." I am talking about signal strength and quality of the signal. Interesting how you first say that bars do not correlate, yet you use "bars" to say how good your signals are on your various phones. Make up your mind.

    Your other comments are valid and interesting.

    --

    Kriston

  39. Re:T-Mobile is rumored to offer in-home VoIP servi by nxtw · · Score: 1
    what method are you using to measure signal strength/quality?

    I was _comparing_ bars, while you were comparing your "signal" as a percentage (of what?). So I assumed you got that info from bars.

  40. VOIP + WRT54G + OSS. by blackest+sun · · Score: 1

    Assumption: internet access. My suggestion is to purchase a wifi phone and a Linksys WRT54G wireless router along with VOIP service...oh yeah, and 2 super long range antennas for the router. The phone and the service are self-explanatory. The router has available an OSS firmware upgrade @ http://www.sveasoft.com/, one advantage of which is to up the power output to the FCC legal limit for said hardware. The antennas (research needed) are required to put that power to use. One should be able to reach a few thousand feet or so rather easily.

    1. Re:VOIP + WRT54G + OSS. by coldguy · · Score: 1
      I wouldn't recommend Sveasoft for anything; I've tried a few different versions, and they ranged from "not quite right" to "plain doesn't work." I've heard mutterings that the freely available versions are deliberately broken in order to encourage you to subscribe, but that's neither here nor there. They may technically be OSS but only because the original Linksys firmware they started from was largely GPL. They seem to do whatever they can to avoid the obligations placed on them by the licenses of the software their product is based on, with such tricks as making the current stable version a "pre-release" and forbidding redistribution... I'm sure some Sveasoft fan will come by and tell me what they're doing is perfectly legal, but it's not exactly in the spirit of OSS.

      If you can handle losing the (lame, in my opinion) Linksys web configuration interface, OpenWRT is probably a better choice. I've had it running for about 6 months here with no problems, and it's a real OSS project, with anoymous CVS access and all. If you do need the web interface, there's a couple of different add-on packages that provide one, or you could use the Freifunk Firmware, which I understand is based on OpenWRT and includes one (I haven't used it mysef).

  41. GSM / DECT combined phones used to exist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At one time it was possible to buy combined GSM / DECT handsets. At some levels these two protocols are quite similar, so it's not too difficult to do. Try googling for "combined DECT GSM". But they seem to have become unavailable (or only available for "campus-scale" deployments); I can only imagine it's because they didn't sell. Phyically they always looked about a generation behind "normal" GSM phones.

    BTW, if you don't know what DECT is, you might be on the wrong continent...