Online Shoppers Naive About Online Prices

smooth wombat writes "Have you ever been shopping online and noticed the difference in prices for the same item at different stores? Do you realize that not only are the prices different from store to store but they could be different for you compared to someone else who shops at the same store? Nearly 2/3 of adult internet shoppers thought that practice was illegal according to a study (pdf format) conducted by the Annenberg Public Policy Center of the University of Pennsylvania. First-time buyers at a retailer could see higher prices than a firm's repeat customers, and retailers may not offer discounts to consumers who buy the same brands regularly without even looking at alternative products on the same site. From the article: 'The Annenberg study was based on results from a telephone survey from Feb. 8 to March 14 of 1,500 adults who said they had used the Internet within the past 30 days. The margin of sampling error was reported to be plus or minus 2.51 percentage points.'"

Comments

Re:and it goes on

[Anonymous Coward]

Only 2/3? I would've guessed that number would be considerably higher, like 4/6 or 8/12 or something...

Bottom feeders

[Skater]

FTA: They are known within the industry as "bottom feeders" who don't show any brand or merchant loyalty.

The arrogance it takes for an industry to come up with this phrase is just amazing. I think I'm generally more pro-business than most Slashdot readers, and I don't even fall into that category - I'll go with a brand/merchant I've used before even if they are priced a bit higher, if I feel I got good service, because I'd rather deal with a known quantity. But the "bottom feeders" term makes me want to slap some people around.

Perhaps what's really annoying me is that companies don't want to compete and so are doing everything they can to attract their "ideal" customer while saying "screw you" to the other guys. As someone who has been ignored at car dealers on several occasions (usually because of my apparent age or because of the borrowed car I was driving that day), I find the practice of turning customers away arrogant and annoying. Changing prices only makes it worse.

Re:and it goes on

[antifoidulus]

You mean to tell me that everyone doing business on the internet is not Honest?

Interesting coming from someone with a free iPod ponzi scheme ad in their sig....

Re:Price discrimination

[NtroP]

If I'm willing to pay more for something than you are, what is unethical about someone selling to me at a higher price?

I agree. This doesn't exactly match what you are saying, but I recently purchased a non-restored, classic muscle car that I had my eye on for some time. I had a price in mind that I was willing to pay for it. When the owner finally relented, it turned out that they were willing to part with it for less than what I was willing to pay - so I bought it. I was happy with my purchase.

Soon after that, I was talking to some acquaintances (who admittedly have more experience and knowledge about classic cars than I do) and was given the impression that I might not have gotten the "deal" I thought I had (based simply on their experience and a verbal description of the vehicle). At first I was dismayed. I felt that I'd been taken, but then I realized, "Hey, wait a minute, nothing has changed. I wanted the car. I was happy with what I paid for it. I'm enjoying the hell out of it. What's the problem."

As it turned out, after having the vehicle actually inspected by an expert I discovered that it was in much better shape than it had a right to be (for being 35 years old) and that all the important VIN numbers matched and that there hadn't been any after-market body or engine modifications to speak of and almost no hidden rust or damage . It turned out that I actually had a better deal than I even thought from the beginning. But regardless I was happy with the purchase and it performed beyond my expectations and I got it for less than what I was willing to pay for it. Why should it upset me if someone else might have been able to get it for less. Good for them! Now this is a little different than buying a new commodity item online - it's a relatively rare and unique, used item - but as long as I got what I was expecting for a price I was happy with, that's what counts. What someone else "might" have gotten a similar (or the same) product for should in no way affect me.

I'm selling my classic class-A motor home. If I sell it in the paper, I want $4,500 for it. I have a friend that expressed interest in it that I quoted $3,000 for it. My wife has a coworker that is in need of one for a very specific thing and is in bad financial straights, I told her I let it go to him for $2,000, no money down and take payments. Should my friend be upset? $4,500 is less than market value and I won't go much lower than that on the open market. If a friend of mine approaches me I'd sell it to them for $3,000 or so. If my neighbor's house burned down I'd give it to them for $1. No-one should feel gypped.

The whole situation reminds me of a time when a coworker got a raise, but was reluctant to discuss it with me because they thought I'd be upset. I said that I was happy for them. They deserved it. They asked why I wasn't angry about it since I hadn't gotten one and I said "Did they take your raise out of my paycheck? Am I suddenly making less money now? Why shouldn't I be happy for you? Nothing has changed for me at all - besides, rich-boy, you buy lunch today"

Not just online

[Ironsides]

There is this one small collectibles shop I go to frequently. On average I spend a couple hundred there a month. The owner decided to start giving me an extra 10% discount since I buy so much. Sounds good to me and I'm about to drop a few hundred there tomorow. Not sure how many others get the discount, but if someone gives you enough business it can make sense to give them a little extra to keep their business and show them you appreciate them.