Slashdot Mirror


Resurrecting Performers Via Computer Performance

putko writes "The NYT has an article entitled 'Play It Again, Vladimir (via Computer)' that discusses efforts to transform old recordings into new, computer played performances (reg. required), by determining how the previous performer made the sounds and redoing it. Further efforts attempt to distill the 'style' of a performer and play other scores with the same style. As can be expected, musicologists argue over whether or not the new musical artifact is really 'a performance'. Philip K. Dick would be proud."

5 of 137 comments (clear)

  1. See Also by stuffman64 · · Score: 5, Informative

    See more information about it here, from (*ahem*) an older Slashdot article...

    --
    --- At my sig, unleash hell.
    1. Re:See Also by stuffman64 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Hmm... quite caustic there (but aren't all cowards that way?).

      If you notice, this is not a repost, rather, it's a story relating to one mentioned earlier. I just thought I'd point that out, since it was quite relevant to the topic.

      --
      --- At my sig, unleash hell.
  2. Great work by karvind · · Score: 2, Informative
    I think these effort should be well appreciated.

    Cutting Archives does a lot of restoration work. Check their faq

    We also had a cool story on slashdot before about Concert to be Performed from Beyond the Grave

  3. Re:Interesting by prichardson · · Score: 2, Informative

    The computer doesn't replicate thought processes, it replicates the technical things that the player is doing. It would be impossible to replicate the player's thought processes because no one on the planet could know exactly what was going through someone's head.

    --
    Help I'm a rock.