Slashdot Mirror


Double Your Fun with DoubleSight

Lothar writes "If you are looking for another reason to throw out that old CRT and upgrade to LCDs here it is. The DoubleSight DS-1900 packs two 19" LCD panels in a neat package and will take up less total space than that cathode ray tube whic has created the permanent bow in your desk. You will end up with 2560x1024 pixels of screen real estate, enough to increase productivity substantially, but you won't have to sacrifice too much space due to the reasonable size of the display's footprint. Just another reason to go LCD..."

6 of 344 comments (clear)

  1. LCD's by the_Bionic_lemming · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Have they eliminated "Blurring" - We have cheap LCD's at work that suck as you scroll up a web page and it "blurs".

    What aboud the dead pixel policy?

    --
    _ _ _ Go for the eyes Boo! GO FOR THE EYES!
  2. Subscriber-free! by Ochu · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Shouldn't be getting that many subscribers posting to this one; after all, they pay not to receive ads.

  3. Is there a rate sheet somewhere? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I mean, if this isn't a "slashvertisement," I don't know what is.

  4. Tigervista have been doing this for years. by MrAngryForNoReason · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Digital Tigers have been making multi LCD monitors like these for years. They offer 2, 3, 4 or 6 screens on a single stand

    The best option to my eyes is the Tigervista Power Trio, one large LCD flanked by two smaller ones mounted portrait. This neatly gets around the problem of having a 'seam' down the middle of your eyeline where the screens join.

    Oh and before the accusations fly I don't work for the company, but I have been lusting after one of their screen setups for a while now.

    Of course you do need an extra graphics card to power the third screen, and the screens are by no means cheap.

  5. General office work too by cgenman · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's great for pretty much any office work.

    I can't tell the number of times I've had a spec open in one monitor, and whatever it was I was working on open in the other. Glancing back and forth between screens is a lot faster than grabbing the mouse, clicking on the taskbar icon, absorbing as much as possible, clicking back, and repositioning your cursor.

    In my particular field, this lets you have the game you're working on open in one monitor, and an editor open in the other, so that you can change values / setups on the fly and see how that effects gameplay. Sure, I could click over, but this is much, much faster. For Midi work I've had the current detail window open in one monitor, and a broad overview of where you are in the song and detail on the vocals you are trying to sync to in the other. For web work, it's great to have Dreamweaver open in one monitor and either a spec or the actual rendered HTML in the other, set to a 1 second refresh. Or a Word Doc open in one monitor, and an Excel Spreadsheet open in the other. Anywhere you have to compare data, a dual-setup is much, much nicer. I'd even like to get a 3rd monitor as basically a dedicated chat/e-mail window, as most of the communication at my company happens over that medium.

    Old CRT's are so plentiful these days that it doesn't make sense not to. I've found 4 free monitors in the past 2 weeks without even looking. If something is going to speed up your workflow, there is no reason not to do it.

    If you've never used a dual-monitor setup, I can see how it would look frivilous. But nearly everyone who uses it loves it, and finds it helps them in their daily tasks. And with monitors basically free and all video cards shipping with two outputs anyway, it doesn't cost a thing to try it out.

  6. 2560*1024? by LordJezo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    How could it be considered that if there is that huge ugly black gap in the middle?

    For that kind of money I'll just get myself an Apple Cinema Display instead. What's a couple more 100 dollars when you are spending that much already?