Slashdot Mirror


Monks See Through Optical Illusion Games

FhnuZoag writes "Nature is reporting that Buddhist monks, highly trained in meditation, were better able to maintain focus in a set of computer generated illusions designed to confuse the brain. The particular illusions involved showing different images to each eye, and maintaining a state of motion-induced blindness. This may be scientific proof of the efficacy of meditative study. The full, original article may be downloaded here. (500 KB PDF)"

63 comments

  1. I'm a.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perl Monk...only i can see through my j33t regexp.

  2. This is priceless... by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 3, Funny

    From TFA:

    Alternatively, we can increase the duration of the disappearance by disrupting teh activity of the Right hemsiphere with precisely time pulses (the Right hemisphere seems to be much more picky about the prcise timing of teh TMS pulse thanthe Left, perhasp associated with the large blocks of time that the Left deals in ).

    What the hell? Who wrote this article, Jeff K.?

    d00d, this iz teh ghey.
    --
    ____

    ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

    1. Re:This is priceless... by Dahan · · Score: 1

      Also, the of that page is "404 Not Found". Now that's quality work there!

    2. Re:This is priceless... by chudgoo · · Score: 2

      You missed "prcise"

    3. Re:This is priceless... by Tux2slack · · Score: 1

      You missed one... "...prcise..."

      --
      Tux2slack
    4. Re:This is priceless... by sckeener · · Score: 1

      From TFA:

      Alternatively, we can increase the duration of the disappearance by disrupting teh activity of the Right hemsiphere with precisely time pulses (the Right hemisphere seems to be much more picky about the prcise timing of teh TMS pulse thanthe Left, perhasp associated with the large blocks of time that the Left deals in ).

      What the hell? Who wrote this article, Jeff K.?

      d00d, this iz teh ghey.


      My wife worked in the English Lab at University of Houston Clear Lake and she saw many of the foreign students make the 'teh' mistake. Don't know about the other errors in the article. I assumed the article was written by someone who's first language wasn't English.

      --
      "Only one thing, is impossible for god: to find any sense in any copyright law on the planet." Mark Twain
  3. Sign me up for the monastery by NitsujTPU · · Score: 1

    I can't make the dots dissapear. Am I just doing this wrong?

    I stare at a frame of reference in the image. I've tried each dot, the center of the image, and the corners of the image.

    Since I'm definately not a monk, I'm sure that others must be experiencing this symptom as well.

    1. Re:Sign me up for the monastery by yotto · · Score: 1

      Are you sure you're not a monk? I look at one dot, and the other two disappear within about 5 seconds. If I blink or jog my eyes at all they come back.

      You have to hold your head really really still.

      Perhaps monks, due to all their training, blink a lot?

    2. Re:Sign me up for the monastery by Akatosh · · Score: 1

      Yes, you're doing it wrong. The article says the oober monk was able to maintain the bindness state for 12 minutes, and the average person for only 2 seconds. Since you can't even get them to disapear in the first place, you'd probably make a lousy monk.

    3. Re:Sign me up for the monastery by Akatosh · · Score: 1

      got it backwards, the article says monks could maintain the blindness state, not avoid the blindness state

    4. Re:Sign me up for the monastery by Professor_UNIX · · Score: 1
      Since I'm definately not a monk, I'm sure that others must be experiencing this symptom as well.

      You must be a PC gamer... Strong is the Force in you. I didn't have any problem at all keeping all three dots in my vision either when focusing on one of them. Is this some kind of joke?

    5. Re:Sign me up for the monastery by Professor_UNIX · · Score: 1

      Oh, well that makes more sense then. I swear to god I couldn't see the god damn sailboat!

    6. Re:Sign me up for the monastery by Lady+Jazzica · · Score: 1

      I must have watched too much Star Trek, because I saw four lights.

    7. Re:Sign me up for the monastery by zxnos · · Score: 1
      the point is to not see the other two dots. the swirling blue dots makes your eyes move without you telling them to. the monks are able to focus on a single dot, causing the others disappear due to the blind spot in the human eye. they have greater control over the subconscious things their body does than you do. that is the point

      your eye is twitching around a lot. the monk can cause his eye to *not* twitch.

      --
      always mosh clockwise
    8. Re:Sign me up for the monastery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong! There are five lights.

    9. Re:Sign me up for the monastery by KDan · · Score: 1

      I'm not necessarily attacking the premise of the experiment (which I assume is performed with a variety of more sophisticated animations)... but I managed to make 2 dots disappear by staring at one, even when the animation was frozen (can be reproduced in FireFox by clicking on the gif and starting to drag it aside - this stops the animation). So much for it being motion-induced!!

      Daniel

      --
      Carpe Diem
    10. Re:Sign me up for the monastery by shawb · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Interestingly enough, I am able to hold the illusion in my left eye for a decent length of time, about half a minute. My right eye can only hold it for about one second, but the illusion reasserts itself rapidly (basically, the other dots flicker at about a one second cycle.) The end result when I am watching with both eyes is that the dots appear translucent. Eventually my vision decouples and I will see two triangles, with one triangle usually missing dots, and the other flickering.

      I wonder why this illusion works. I have heard mention that it is because the dots that disapear are in the blind spot in the middle of the eye, but I don't think this would explain losing sight of all three dots. I wonder if it has to do with the model of the brain as a state-change detector. Pre-consciousness (evolutionary times before we were conscious) is primarilly concerned with detecting changes in the environment, and then reacting based on them. Since the yellow dots are not moving, focus on them is lost and they are discarded as extraneous information. Sort of like the antithesis of not seeing a cameflaged object untill it moves.

      Meditation would tend to uphold the illusion, as one of the goals is to empty the mind of that which does not matter, possibly allowing the mind to concentrate on what is truly important.

      --
      I'll never make that mistake again, reading the experts' opinions. - Feynman
    11. Re:Sign me up for the monastery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think that the blue dots not moving might make it easier to make the yellow ones dissapear. I think the point may have been that if you hold your eyes perfectly still, the yellow dots disappear, but if they move, the dots reappear. The moving blue dots would tend to make your eyes move, making the illusion go away.

    12. Re:Sign me up for the monastery by Transcendent · · Score: 1

      I can hold this for at least 10 seconds from what I've done so far... but then my eyes start to itch and i blink.

    13. Re:Sign me up for the monastery by Transcendent · · Score: 1

      Peripheral vision is based more on movement, and has more black and white receptors (rods) than the center (cones... for color). Hence, any images that are not moving much in the peripheral would get lost by the brain, and many shades of yellow tend to come out as black when converted to black and white anyway (like the background).

      The blind spots are interesting on their own... you can make your thumb disappear if you hold it our to your right. The blind spot in the middle of the eye is only at night, since there are barely any black and white receptors in that area (you see in black and white at night... the rods are more sensitive to light). That always freaked me out when I'd try to stare at something glowing at night, and it would disappear... kind of annoying too at times.

    14. Re:Sign me up for the monastery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is nothing new. I've noticed the effect every single night when I goto sleep. From bed I can see the LED lights of my computer and I'd noticed years ago that staring at them made the rest of the room disappear and even the slightest break in concentration stopped the illusion.

    15. Re:Sign me up for the monastery by shawb · · Score: 1

      I thought the blind spot in the middle was because that's where the veins come in that feed the retina. I remember hearing that as one piece of evidence against intelligent design, as it is perfectly explainable if you follow evolution of the eye, but if the eye was an "engineered" organ the veins/arteries would simply develop behind the retina.

      --
      I'll never make that mistake again, reading the experts' opinions. - Feynman
    16. Re:Sign me up for the monastery by Cthefuture · · Score: 1

      You're probably not focusing long enough. It's like those 3D pictures, it took me a minute to figure out the mental state required to make them disappear. Once I got that I can now make them disappear quickly and for as long as I like. Pretty cool.

      I wonder if this damanges anything though. After doing it for a couple minutes, when I stopped it was like someone had taken my picture with a flash or something. Even as I type this the visual residue is still there.

      --
      The ratio of people to cake is too big
    17. Re:Sign me up for the monastery by ikkonoishi · · Score: 1

      For me it happened as my eyes dried out due to not blinking.

    18. Re:Sign me up for the monastery by NitsujTPU · · Score: 1

      That's actually normal.

  4. That's not surprising by Linux_ho · · Score: 1

    Buddhist meditation is a practice designed to help people stay grounded in the real world, instead of wrapped up in their thoughts, opinions, and other conditioned reactions to outside stimulus. For most people I know, their opinions are more real to them than the air they're breathing.

    --
    include $sig;
    1;
    1. Re:That's not surprising by Gulthek · · Score: 1

      Funny, Buddhists hope for freedom from the "real" world and much of their meditative training is supposed to help break the perception of this real world.

    2. Re:That's not surprising by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 1

      Staying grounded in the real world is for earthworms. I like thinking. Try it some time.

      --
      Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
    3. Re:That's not surprising by crmartin · · Score: 1

      Funny how complete ignorance of a subject will confuse you.

    4. Re:That's not surprising by Amiasian · · Score: 1

      With greater focus, I'd suspect these techniques could improve one's clarity of thought. My view has always been that Buddhism is more a religion of the intellect than of faith. I admire that.

    5. Re:That's not surprising by falzer · · Score: 1

      You think that's air they're breathing?

    6. Re:That's not surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      My view has always been that Buddhism is more a religion of the intellect than of faith. I admire that.

      Yes, ignorant Westerners do tend to idolize Buddhism that way.

      Where is the "intellectual" side to the several Buddhist hells where the wicked are tormented eternally? Where is the "intellectual" side to the hungry ghosts? Where is the "intellectual" side to stories of the Buddha's miracles, which are suspiciously similar to the stories you presumably reject of Jesus' and Mohammed's?

      Where is the "intellectual" side to a religion that, in its most popular form in Japan, states that it doesn't matter what you do in this life - so long as you say "namu amida butsu" just before you die, you are guaranteed to be reborn in the paradise of Amitabha Buddha and gain Nirvana after just one more life? Seems to me that's pretty much based on faith rather than intellect.

    7. Re:That's not surprising by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1
      Where is the "intellectual" side to the several Buddhist hells where the wicked are tormented eternally? Where is the "intellectual" side to the hungry ghosts?

      These are what Buddhist teachers call "skillful means".

      They are not core Buddhist teachings, they are shiny candy coatings (and you will find noted Buddhist teachers, especially in the Zen traditions, who explictly confirm this) introduced in the Mahayana traditions to help ignorant and superstitious people swallow the "medicine" of Buddhist teaching.

      As always, some people focus on the candy (hey, just like computer interfaces!) rather than the substance. If you want to avoid the candy, stick to Zen and to some of the Theravada (Hinayana) traditions. I think the candy is ok in small doses - the hells and hungry ghosts are very good metaphors, for example.

      When questioned by his contemporaries about life after death and other "supernatural" phenomenea, the Buddha explictly said they were outside the scope of his teaching - that being the nature, origin, and relief of human suffering.

      I've been re-reading some of my books on Buddhism lately to get ready for a talk I'm giving next week (in case any "techno-pagans" are headed to the Free Spirit Festival next week, I'll be presenting a workshop there on "Zen Paganism"). Here's some of my recommended reading for those interested in learning more about Buddhism:

      Jane Hope and Borin Van Loon, "Introducing Buddha". A good, lighthearted but not shallow overview of Buddhism. Slightly tilted toward Vajrayana ("Tantric" Buddhism, as found in the Tibetan styles).

      Huston Smith, "The Religions of Man", and its updated version "The World's Religions". This book should be required reading for humanity. It has excellent sections on Hinduism, Buddhism, and Taoism.

      Thich Nhat Hanh's "No Death, No Fear", "Be Free Where You Are", and "The Heart of Understanding"

      Raymond M. Smullyan, "The Tao is Silent". A modern Western logician connects with the Tao. (Zen is Buddhism + Taoism, stirred over an open flame...)

      Camden Benares, "Zen Without Zen Masters". For the Discordian connection.

      Alan Watts, "The Way of Zen", and "Beat Zen, Square Zen, and Zen" . The original short article version of the later can be found at http://www.bluesforpeace.com/beat_zen.htm.

      Seung Sahn, "Dropping Ashes on the Buddha"; and Wu Kwang, "Open Mouth Already a Mistake". These are collections of talks, from Korean Zen Master Seung Sahn, and one of his American students, Wu Kwand (Richard Shrobe). http://www.kwanumzen.com/.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    8. Re:That's not surprising by Amiasian · · Score: 1

      When I say intellectual, I'm going back before the myths, which I reject, to the practical application of the ideas.

      I don't believe any chanting or praying will earn some sort of salvation. But I do believe that Buddhism teaches salvation and happiness come from within. I find that to be psychologically sound.

    9. Re:That's not surprising by Linux_ho · · Score: 1

      Yes, ignorant Westerners do tend to idolize Buddhism that way.

      Where is the "intellectual" side to the several Buddhist hells where the wicked are tormented eternally? Where is the "intellectual" side to the hungry ghosts? Where is the "intellectual" side to stories of the Buddha's miracles, which are suspiciously similar to the stories you presumably reject of Jesus' and Mohammed's?

      Where is the "intellectual" side to a religion that, in its most popular form in Japan, states that it doesn't matter what you do in this life - so long as you say "namu amida butsu" just before you die, you are guaranteed to be reborn in the paradise of Amitabha Buddha and gain Nirvana after just one more life? Seems to me that's pretty much based on faith rather than intellect.


      Real Buddhism is the teachings of the Buddha, and he never said any of that stuff. Just because a lot of people call that Buddhism doesn't mean that it is. There are also lots of people saying and doing crazy things in Jesus' and Mohammed's names. Doesn't mean that their ideas and actions are in line with real Christian or Muslim teachings.

      --
      include $sig;
      1;
  5. Not sure what this means by over_exposed · · Score: 1

    I tried the illusion they referenced at http://www.uq.edu.au/nuq/jack/bonneh.html and my "self reported" results were on par with the monks. If I blink, I lose the focus and see the other 2 dots, but I can stave off the other two as long as I can hold off blinking. Anyone else?

    --
    "The object of war is not to die for your country, but to make the other bastard die for his." - Patton
    1. Re:Not sure what this means by joncue · · Score: 1

      I had the same experience, as long as I didn't blink, I could not see the two dots that I wasn't focused on.

      BTW, your sig is great.

  6. efficacy by epine · · Score: 0, Offtopic


    I thought "efficacy" was related to the root "effective", but apparently it's a sibling to Papacy.

    1. Re:efficacy by p3d0 · · Score: 1

      What are you talking about?

      --
      Patrick Doyle
      I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
    2. Re:efficacy by cataclyst · · Score: 1

      Um, no it's not. /me has just slapped you with a fish...

      --
      E = m * c^(Hammer)
  7. Change-blindness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ah yes.
    This study reminds me of change blindness experiments.
    Weird, wacky stuff.

  8. Zen is denial? by bsdbigot · · Score: 2, Funny

    Student: Why are the bars horizontal on the left and vertical on the right?
    Master: One eye sees truth, one eye sees falsehood.
    Student: Which eye is correct?
    Master: Neither.

    --
    main(){char I,l,O[]={'-',1-1,0,(1<<5)-1,0+'-',-10-1,-10,11-0,- 1,-100};for(I=l=0;l<10+0;put
  9. Monkeys see through optical illusion games by durandal61 · · Score: 1

    That's what I read, anyway. I was rather looking forward to it.

    --
    My motorbike travels in Chile.
    1. Re:Monkeys see through optical illusion games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL. Same Same!

      I was looking forward to a story about newly discovered/gentically programmed, super monkeys who have mental abilities 3 times superior to us puny humans...

      All I get however is a story about some crummy old monks... Bah!

  10. How do they know what the monks saw? by Momoru · · Score: 2, Funny

    I think the monks were just lying, dirty lying monks.

  11. FIRST OM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    zen master shows me
    what is real and what is fake
    i see through dupes, trolls

  12. Maybe nitpicky, but... by mattwarden · · Score: 0

    ... science can't prove anything. You might say I'm splitting hairs, but if you change the OP's sentence to 'may be scientific evidence of the efficacy of meditative study', it's then stating the obvious, so I'm not sure that's what (s)he meant. Actually, I just like pointing out small errors people make on /. I'm confident in the empathy of many here in this regard.

  13. Meditating by Dharma's+Dad · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I have had some success meditating, of the school where one trys to clear the mind of thoughts. Looking at the dot animation, trying to "keep the mind quiet" and not re-resolve the yellow dots feels very similar to trying to get the mind to "not think" (although it is easier with the animation, since there is something to "entertain" the mind [the blue dots]).

    The way it was explained to me, the mind is afraid it will cease to exist if it is not involved in constant thought or self-conversation.

    Meditation if very powerful. A short 5-10 minute session is worth about a two hour nap, in removing tiredness (but only works once, maybe twice, per day). Several guys in the meditation group I was in commented that there is nowhere the mind can "go" with hallucinogens that cannot be attained with meditation - interesting observation.

    One of the most surprising things about meditating is that even in the deepest states, one is still completely aware of everything around them, actually moreso than usual. You can stop to answer the door or whatever with no "hangover" as happens when coming out of sleep.

    Meditation is definitly worth exploring, if you have any interest. It does not require attachment to any religious beliefs to practice successfully. I have found that most people who are into it are not offended if you want to learn only mediation, even if they practice it in the context their religion.

    1. Re:Meditating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some care is required however. In people who are susceptible to mental illness (like schizophrenia), it can actually precipitate occurrences of that illness.

      If there's a family history of mental illness, people should stay clear of things like meditation, drugs, stress, etc.
      Sucks for them, but the alternative is worse.

    2. Re:Meditating by zienth · · Score: 1

      That depends on the mental illness. I know from experience that meditation helps my ADD (although that's claffified as a disorder, not an illness). It has also been shown to help many people with depression.
      It's probably best to do a little research on your particular illness/disorder. I wouldn't just say that anyone with a family history of any mental illness should completely stay clear. Just because your Aunt Tilly has epilepsy is no reason for you to miss the benifits of meditation if you've never had any sort of symptom.

    3. Re:Meditating by amliebsch · · Score: 1

      I accomplish the same thing by getting some ambient or classical music and playing it on my computer while staring directly at a full-screen G-Force visualization. I think it may be a self-induced state of hypnosis.

      --
      If you don't know where you are going, you will wind up somewhere else.
  14. Thinking changes perception? by crmartin · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This is interesting.

    I've been doing Buddhist practices for damn near 40 years now, and I've noticed it anecdotally: a lot of visual illusions don't seem to work any longer. Now, it's hard to separate that out from being, well, old (remember how as a kid it looked for all the world like the moon was racing along with your car when Mom and Dad drove you somewhere at night?) and perceptual psych is way down the list of things I want to do in my spare time, but it seems completely plausible to me that monks who spend lots more time in these practices than I do would show these effects very strongly.

    Exceeding focus of thought is required to write a sentence like that one, I hope you know.

    1. Re:Thinking changes perception? by shawb · · Score: 1

      There is a difference in this one... the trained monks are better able to maintain the illusion. Might have to do with the mind's ability to tune out that which is not important. In this case, since the dots are not important, they get tuned out.

      --
      I'll never make that mistake again, reading the experts' opinions. - Feynman
  15. Journey to West by jd · · Score: 1
    My knowledge of Buddhism can be summarized as the contents of a rather comic TV series and the book from which it comes ("Journey to West"). Tripitaka, the monk in the series, was decieved by numerous illusions, but the primary character (Monkey, "Great Sage and Equal of Heaven") routinely used all sorts of cunning, trickery and a pink cloud to resolve all such issues.


    I am unsure as to why meditation, per se, would help at all with optical illusions. TM alters the brain chemistry, to a degree, but in ways I would have thought might actually make a person more likely to be susceptible.


    On the other hand, what little I do know about the religion would suggest that they mistrust their senses, which means that although they may perceive an illusion, they might not readily accept that the illusion had any basis. But, since that would seem to be how they regard the rest of the Universe, the ability to distinguish on observation alone would seem to be just as limited.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    1. Re:Journey to West by crmartin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The Journey to the West is hilarious, you should get the whole thing sometime.

      Anyway, it's not that Buddhists distrust the sense themseves: they distrust thoughts about the senses. Those thoughts then can modify the way you perceive the sensory data --- consider watching someone eat, with evident enjoyment, a dark brown semi-liquid substance with a spoon. Your perception of it, down to visceral reactions, is wildly different if you think it's chocolate ice cream or dog poop.

    2. Re:Journey to West by jd · · Score: 1

      It's a four-book volume, in the most complete form. From the sounds of it, there's a lot of cultural in-jokes and references, which I'll likely miss, but I've ordered the set anyway.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  16. efficacy? by cahiha · · Score: 2

    It's unclear that defeating optical illusions is a good thing. Many optical illusions are just part of the normal functioning of the visual system. In some cases, optical illusions directly aid in the perception of the real world, in other cases, they may not have a function, but are an indication that other processes are working as they should. A completely "literal" (metric, whatever) interpretation is generally not useful, even if you could achieve it.

    1. Re:efficacy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seeing through the illusion unconsciously may not be a good thing, perhaps no better than never even noticing there is an illusion in the first place.

      But knowing when an illusion exists and then choosing to act either as if the illusion did or did not exist (depending on current circumstances) can't be bad.

  17. Haiku! by StressGuy · · Score: 1

    gesundheit

    --
    A goal is a dream with a deadline
  18. Page Not Found by NewStarRising · · Score: 1

    Did anybody else notice that the page title is "404 Not Found" ?
    After opening the page in a background tab (Firefox), I glanced to see it reporting 404. Dang, I thought, /.ed already. Moving to the page to close it, I saw it was there. I checked their tags

    (title)404 Not Found(/title)

    --
    b3 4phr41d 0f my 4bov3-4v3r4g3 c0mpu73r kn0wI3dg3!
    MadDwarf
  19. Monk? by relaxrelax · · Score: 1


    I can maintain the illusion - or the lack of illusion - as long as I want.

    So am I a zen master yet? (-;

    Now seriously, try this kind of test as part of a videogame and see how good gaming geeks do. Especially if they don't know which part of the game is testing them!

    --
    Microsoft is pure dog-ma. FreeBSD is pure cat-ma.
  20. This is as they intended by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a zen thing.

  21. Read 'em up yourself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Find Buddha's texts. You can Google them up if you don't want to go to a library. Read stuff by people influenced by him (certain Chinese things). Read a lot of them. You will see a pattern. Read also Patanjali's scripture when you're far enough. That's what Buddha was saying. The rest is noise generated by hangaround people (the same ones which invent the "he did supernatural things!" lies).

    It's all about dealing with mind, reality and perception of those things.

    I think Hinayana is more correct to the original source than Mahayana.

    Rebirth is a symbolic meaning of how you're stuck in your ways, how you walk your life from happiness to sadness and back, unable to break free from such chain of events. It does not mean being actually born again, physically. State where rebirth ends is when you're just you, you don't have those silly mood swings tripping you out.
    Rebirth means mental state, not physically appearing again.

    Read! Think!

    PS. Likewise, if you wish to repeat the exercise for Jesus, pick up the bible and read about the sermon on the mountain. Then think, what was the message. See how when you cut through the oddball parts requiring faith (and other such parts which are obviously wrong) you are left with very intelligent texts!

    Best regards, Ignorant Westerner.