Microsoft Found Guilty of Patent Infringement
Spy der Mann writes "Microsoft has been found guilty of patent infringement and ordered to pay a Guatamalan inventor Carlos Armando Amado almost $9m in damages.
The US District Court of Central California court ruled that Microsoft had infringed on his intellectual property and ordered it to pay him $8.96m.
The patent in question is a method to transfer data between Microsoft Excel and Microsoft Access using a single spreadsheet."
Take your smarmy pseudo-intellectual "I'm so much smarter than all the plebs on Slashdot" attitude and shove it.
Actually only "children" have such 'black and white' views of the world as you exhibit.
Are you even capable of realising that patents can be bad and MS's ethics can be bad? That doesn't seem like a difficult concept at all to grasp.
This patent is bad, because not only does it prevent anyone else from doing anything as basic as writing a data converter between a spreadsheet and database (e.g. OpenOffice?), now only Microsoft will be allowed to do so, and for the paltry "purchase price" of $9 million.
Everyone loses, except some Guatamalan (sp?) individual and MS.