Slashdot Mirror


Patent Reform Bill Introduced in U.S. House

kanad wrote to mention a ZDNet article covering the introduction of the Patent Reform Act of 2005 to the U.S. House of Representatives. From the article: "Probably the most sweeping change would be the creation of a process to challenge patents after they are granted by the Patent and Trademark Office. 'Opposition requests' can be filed up to nine months after a patent is awarded or six months after a legal notice alleging infringement is sent out. The bill is supported by the USPTO and Microsoft who have been recently asking for patent reforms ." More details of the bill are available at the Congressman's website."

1 of 263 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Peer Review - Solution by masklinn · · Score: 1, Redundant
    Why not introduce a peer review process by which a patent in a particular industry is reviewed by patent holders in the same industry? In this manner, a frivolous patent could be easily circumvented with a simple review request. A few hundred peers simply review the patent and then decide if it is legit.
    Until they decide to cross-license their respective patents, accept their friend's patents propositions (all of them), work together to completely lock the software market and proceed to rape your ripe little virgin ass.
    --
    "The way we can tell it's C# instead of Haskell is because it's nine lines instead of two." -- wadler