Slashdot Mirror


Halo Movie Deal Moves Closer

Universal and Fox are apparently close to coming up with a deal Microsoft is happy with for the in-the-works Halo film. Gamespot reports that the two movie studios will cofinance the hugely expensive movie title. From the article: "while Universal and Fox's offer is now the only game in town, Microsoft is still unsure if it wants to play ball. Variety and the Times say the agreement is held up on two fronts. First, the two studios requested that Microsoft relinquish its demands and that the Halo movie strictly follow a Bungie-penned "bible," which would ensure that it would not deviate from the Halo mythos or conflict with "sequels" to the game (i.e. Halo 3). The second reported sticking point was Microsoft's insistence that principal shooting begin as soon as possible, possibly as early as this fall."

53 comments

  1. Closer? by jclast · · Score: 1

    So it's still a tangled mess that may or may not happen? How is that closer?

    --
    e2 | LJ
  2. Evangelicals... by MyLongNickName · · Score: 1

    ... are all jumping into the movie scene after Mel Gibson's movie. When will it end?

    --
    See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    1. Re:Evangelicals... by centauri · · Score: 1

      As soon as they figure out how to activate one of the Installations.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Durga.
  3. Maybe this is for the best... by penguin121 · · Score: 1

    after all the vast majority of movies based on video games haven't been all that great, so i'm doubtful this one would be much better if it ever gets off the ground...

  4. ugh by Gogo0 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Does anyone else see this movie as a $75Mil+ Halo3 commercial meant almost solely to steal thunder from the PS3 and Rev's launches?
    Am I the only one who finds that abso-fucking-lutely rediculous?

    1. Re:ugh by jclast · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It could be a legitimate attempt at a multimedia franchise. There are already novels being published and toys being produces. I don't know if they're canon, but I'm sure they're selling.

      --
      e2 | LJ
    2. Re:ugh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh please, enough with these anti-Microsoft consiracies. Video game-based movies are nothing new.

    3. Re:ugh by dyftm · · Score: 1

      Novels are absolutely canon. The toys are as well, although they don't add anything to the story. On an aside, the novels (all 3 of them: Fall of Reach, The Flood, First Strike) are fantastic, and well worth reading.

    4. Re:ugh by jclast · · Score: 1

      I figure I'll play the games first. I still don't own an XBox, but the price ought to fall quickly after the 360 launches. Then I'll have cheap games to play for a long time.

      --
      e2 | LJ
    5. Re:ugh by aztektum · · Score: 1

      Shit man that wasn't anti-MS the same could be said about any number of franchises.

      And I know I'm being hypocritical when I say this but can we get over the bitchin' about MS bashers. Stop reading /. if it bugs you that much.

      --
      :: aztek ::
      No sig for you!!
    6. Re:ugh by zxnos · · Score: 1

      not really. i see it the same as the final fantasy movie. intersting story and state-of-the-art cg.

      --
      always mosh clockwise
    7. Re:ugh by CaptKilljoy · · Score: 1

      >Does anyone else see this movie as a $75Mil+ Halo3 commercial meant almost solely to steal thunder from the PS3 and Rev's launches?

      *cough*Pokemon*cough*

    8. Re:ugh by amliebsch · · Score: 1

      I don't think it's ridiculous, it's superb marketing. I called it on the last article. A Halo3 movie timed to come out when Halo3 launches. Maybe even the same day. Previously unimaginable levels of hype.

      --
      If you don't know where you are going, you will wind up somewhere else.
    9. Re:ugh by JFMulder · · Score: 1

      How the hell did this get modded insightfull? Honnestly, some people will just spill anything when Microsoft is involved.

      Stealing thunder??? This movie is going to come out in summer 2007 at the very soonest. Anyone who thinks this is a move to undermine consoles who will have launched a year before is just stupid. Anyway, this is a scheme to make MONEY, nothing else.

  5. Microsoft should... by TEMM · · Score: 2, Interesting

    not give in to the studios, Bungies bible is probably the only thing keeping a Halo movie from being made into a huge piece of crap. Game movies flop usually becase they deviate too far from the games storyline and universe. IE not using the same main characters, or changing the main characters, or completely changing the "topic" of the movie. If microsoft does one thing right it should be making sure that bungie gets the final say in how the movie plays out.

    1. Re:Microsoft should... by Gravedigger3 · · Score: 1

      I agree 100%. Most movies based on games are bad because they stray to far from the games we know and love. (Take Final Fantasy for example). That "bible" that MS and Bungie have created is what will keep this movie true to the games. Bungie is a smart group and they wont let anyone destroy their franchise if they can help it. I hope that MS stands firm and forces the studio to stick to their "bible".

      --
      All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be. -PF
    2. Re:Microsoft should... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are not going to like this, but a so called "bible" isn't going to save halo's already shitty and cliché ridden plot.

    3. Re:Microsoft should... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, *if* the story is shitty, then at least the bible will keep it from being worse. I personally found it to be a good story. Not exactly epic, like God of War, but at least good enough to be made into a movie. The movie industry has tried to make movies that are good by *their* standards, not the gamers' standards. If you look at most of those movies as just movies and not try to tie them in to the game franchise, then most of them are at least decent. The reason that they are bad is because they use the name of the video game, so gamers want them to follow the storyline perfectly. When the movie doesn't, then that's all you think about. You don't even pay attention to any redeeming qualities that the movie may have. Now I admit that it'd be nice to see a movie that follows a game's storyline perfectly, but when you go to any game related movie look at it as a movie. You'll probably like it a lot more. It's like my life. I maintain a generally pessimistic outlook, and I rarely find myself disappointed. You guys should try it.

    4. Re:Microsoft should... by Cabriel · · Score: 1

      I agree. The worst thing that could happen to this movie would be like making a Doom movie without Mars and hell-spawned Demons. I'm not looking forward to Doom, but I want to look forward to this.

    5. Re:Microsoft should... by Pluvius · · Score: 1

      Final Fantasy didn't stray away from the games at all. Just add an identity crisis and a mysterious villain and you basically would've gotten Final Fantasy 7 (though the spirits sub-plot was more reminiscent of FF4).

      Super Mario Brothers is a much better example of the movie not much resembling the game.

      Rob

  6. Inaccurate article text by Matchstick · · Score: 2, Informative

    The GameSpot article has a factual error as a result of a typo:

    First, the two studios requested that Microsoft relinquish its demands and that the Halo movie strictly follow a Bungie-penned "bible,"

    The "bible" demand comes from Microsoft, not from the studios. One reference: http://www.scifi.com/scifiwire2005/index.php?categ ory=0&id=31144

    1. Re:Inaccurate article text by FLAGGR · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Okay, everyone had a enough common sense to figure it out. I think you need to get a new English parser if you an 'and' can completly throw you off. Especially if you read the last article.

  7. This is why Hollywood pisses me off.... by Jtheletter · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Here you have M$ and Bungie making what amounts to a reasonable request that the studios not deviate from the universe of the game when creating the Halo movie. Sure, this might mean a larger effects or set budget, or perhaps it means the editing process needs to be a little more careful about what they cut, or that some self-sure studio writer can't use the hyper-excellent catch phrase for the Chief to say and be sound-bited to death in previews. But it seems to me that the studio is getting a lot more in return by respecting this caveat. What Bungie has is an established title and storyline in a well-defined universe, and along with that are hundreds of thousands* of devoted fans who already know the backstory of the games, and thousands more who feel they 'own' part of that universe from literally perticipating in it via the I Love Bees viral marketing adventure. This means that the only thing the studios could possibly do by deviating from Bungie's bible is to screw it up and alienate or tick off a ready-made fan-base for the film.

    Think about it, there are tons of gamers salivating over this film I'm sure. But what is going to happen when reviews, leaked scripts, etc start coming out and they find that perhaps major parts of the story they know and love have been changed, and - given the studios' track records - probably for the worse? They're going to snub the film, that's what. Maybe not enough to make it tank, but probably a sizable number will choose to wait for the DVD, or not see it all. We geeks are extremely pedantic, we love details, it's what we do. Mucking about with 'our' culture is only insulting to us, and we recognize and resent it.

    I know it takes more than just the /. crowd to make money for a film, and we do overinflate our importance, after all you need the public at large to like the film as well to be truly successful. But I think that with Halo, being as well defined and straightforward a story/universe as it is, there shouldn't be any need to alter it to dumb it down (or up) for the masses. Hollywood just wants to maintain its monopoly of culture and cater to the lowest common denominator. To paraphrase Chris Rock in another bad movie: 'We [the studios] tried that, and we got damn rich doing it. But maybe now it's time to try a different way.' After all what's the worse that could happen? It's not like the Bungie version of the film could be any worse than the Mario Bros Movie. Right? God I hope not.

    * re: hundreds of thousands of fans - I have no idea what the number is but it's got to be big. maybe millions? I dunno, I just pulled a number out of my butt, let it go already.

    --
    -- I'm not a pessimist, I'm a realist. It's not my fault that life sucks so much. --
    1. Re:This is why Hollywood pisses me off.... by zxnos · · Score: 1
      wasnt the same said about the lord of the rings? thats appears to have done well.

      i never saw mario brothers. is it worse than the highlander trilogy? (i was amazed they concocted a sequel after the first one, not to mention a third)

      --
      always mosh clockwise
    2. Re:This is why Hollywood pisses me off.... by JFMulder · · Score: 1

      They actually made a fourth movie. :)
      Plus a spin-off TV Show.

    3. Re:This is why Hollywood pisses me off.... by zxnos · · Score: 1

      a fourth? i liked the tv series but wished they would follow a random immortal until he/she was taken. then follow the victor for a few episodes. i hate how the main characters can never die. if you need a consistent character to draw an audience, use a watcher.

      --
      always mosh clockwise
    4. Re:This is why Hollywood pisses me off.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It doesn't piss me off so much as intrigue me, Hollywood film generate a significant fraction (often more than half) of their profit from DVD sales, the hardcore dedicated masses that you speak of only account for a small fraction of what is need to make a successful film, but when you start considering that everyone of these will buy at least 1 copy of the DVD (Special editions etc accounting for more) then it starts seeming foolish for them not to.

      Another interesting point is that the marketing for Halo is already in place, it's not like they need to build a brand or anything, just promote it and in turn reducing the marketing budget.

  8. Why not just pull a Square and do it themselves? by Alzheimers · · Score: 2, Funny

    At this point, if Microsoft is so confident that the movie would succeed should it be made, why don't they just open their own studio and make it themselves? If Halo: The Movie does do well, who knows what other Microsoft franchises might get sent to the big screen?

    Flight Simulator: in IMAX 3D!

  9. Take your time by alvinrod · · Score: 1
    The second reported sticking point was Microsoft's insistence that principal shooting begin as soon as possible, possibly as early as this fall. According to Variety, Universal and Fox will only "promise simply to get the pic into theaters by 2007 at the latest."

    Microsoft always wants to rush everything and only ends up with a crappy product in the end. I hope whatever company decides to make the film takes their time and makes it worth seeing.

    In unrelated news, I bet that if the said company does take their time and gets it out in 2007, it will still potentially beat a Microsoft Longhorn launch date.

    1. Re:Take your time by srmalloy · · Score: 2, Funny
      Microsoft always wants to rush everything and only ends up with a crappy product in the end. I hope whatever company decides to make the film takes their time and makes it worth seeing.

      Thinking about this, it may be the movie that makes George Lucas' vision of electronic distribution of digital movies to theatres the industry standard, because that's the only way that Microsoft's going to be able to distribute a patch after "MS Halo 1.0" proves to be massively buggy and BSOD's in theatres nationwide...

  10. Re:Why not just pull a Square and do it themselves by TrippTDF · · Score: 2, Funny

    This Summer... PowerPoint: The Movie

  11. Re:Why not just pull a Square and do it themselves by -kertrats- · · Score: 1

    Because that worked out soooo well for Square.

    --
    The Braying and Neighing of Barnyard Animals Follows.
  12. Re:Why not just pull a Square and do it themselves by jclast · · Score: 1

    Voice-over: Just when you thought it was safe to use MS Word...
    Clippy: So, it looks like you're writing a letter...
    Voice-over: This summer, experience the terror of the The Office "Assistant"!

    --
    e2 | LJ
  13. It's fun to be vindicated by DaveJay · · Score: 1

    I posted this in the last thread about the Halo movie:

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=151990&cid=127 53829

    And it's always nice to be right about something, since they've only got one offer on the table, and that offer comes with the predicted we're-not-going-to-follow-your-bible clause. If they want principle photography to start this fall, they should hire a production team and just do it. Of course, if they want a good movie, then they'll wait and do it right.

  14. Re:Why not just pull a Square and do it themselves by turbopunk · · Score: 1

    This is exactly what i thought. Microsoft is asking for a 75 million dollar budget, minimum, for this movie. Last i checked, doesn't Microsoft make that in about a day?

    i'm sure they could eat the cost of production for the movie, and then easily get someone to distribute it.

  15. Maybe it could be good by EyesofWolf · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If they consult Red vs. Blue for the script...

    --
    "A wolf's eyes can see into your soul"
    My writing
  16. They better use MLG rules by Lonath · · Score: 1

    or *I* won't be watching it.

  17. Not unreasonable (Fox + Universal)... by hubang · · Score: 1

    The average action movie has something like 20 weeks of preproduction these days. Sci Fi is more (you can't even hope to shoot on location). The script probably has to be tossed. I hated 28 Days Later! Garland is not the best choice to script it, Dan O'Bannon would have been better.

    As for the writer's bible, these are fairly common... on TV. The movies are a whole other game.

    I also wonder why M$ didn't buy out a small studio, or build one. They could (would) have shot it on spec if they really believed in the project. My guess is that they just want to use this as lead in advertising for Halo 3. They don't expect the movie to do better than break even, if that.

    I may be wrong, but I think the Studios are concerned that MicroSoft will leave them high and dry.

  18. One word by Geoffreyerffoeg · · Score: 0, Redundant

    that Microsoft relinquish its demands and that the Halo movie strictly follow a Bungie-penned "bible,"

    Is the word "and" in that clause supposed to be there?

  19. Offtopic Warning! by th3space · · Score: 1

    "not really. i see it the same as the final fantasy movie. intersting story and state-of-the-art cg."

    Have you ever listened to the commentary tracks for Final Fantasy: The Spirits Within?

    The animation team spends the entire session badmouthing the studio for rewriting the script 20 to 30 times, forcing them to constantly rework the sequences, drop them, add them, pick up dropped ones, etc (case in point, the opening opening sequence was one of the first ones created (Aki floating in her craft), the director/writer decided to drop it, only to come back later and just the very same one they originally disliked). They pretty well lambasted the fact that what had started as a solid, original idea, quickly devolved in to Hollywood tripe that made no damn sense.

    At the same time, the producer/writer commentary is praising it as a technical marvel, and barely glosses over the fact that they effed the story up beyond any recognizable comprehension, and only barely attempt to explain how the movie has *anything* in common with the games beyond Cyd and the notion of a planet as a living being...

    That's some funny stuff, when taken together. I never though the story was awful, but I can certainly see that they could have made a more concerted effort to have it be compelling and cohesive, rahter than just 'high concept'.

    --
    "How like you to drag your keyboard to a gun fight." - Aaron Bedard (BANE)
    1. Re:Offtopic Warning! by zxnos · · Score: 1

      interesting. i only saw it in the theater. do any of the games have that much in common? other than mechanics and charater archtypes?

      --
      always mosh clockwise
    2. Re:Offtopic Warning! by jclast · · Score: 1

      Cid, chocobos, airships, and some of the summons seem to be the only real running themes.

      However, some of the universes are definitely related.

      • FFX -> FFX-2 // duh
      • FFX-2 -> FFVII // Shinra is a member of the Gullwings and I seem to remember reading an interview stating that the 2 happen in the same universe.
      • FFVII -> FFVII: Advent Children // Continuation of the FFVII story.
      • FFVII -> FFVII: Dirge of Cerberus // Seems to be a non-RPG gaiden featuring Vincent.
      • FFVII -> FFT // You can find Cloud in FFT, tying Ivalice to Midgar.
      • FFT -> FFTA // These happen in the same place, Ivalice.
      • FFTA -> FFXII // FMV from XII shows races hertofore only seen in FFTA, and it also happens in Ivalice, if I recall correctly.
      --
      e2 | LJ
  20. Re:Why not just pull a Square and do it themselves by CrackedButter · · Score: 1

    You could get that guy who does all the intros for movies on this as well for extra fun. "In a world..."

  21. Re:Why not just pull a Square and do it themselves by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

    Knowing how faithful these conversions tend to be, Clippy would probably replaced with the M.U.L.E., not that it would make a difference.

    --
    Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
  22. Great Movie. Two Thumbs Up! by bleaknik · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Am I the only one who finds this to be absolutely ridiculous.

    I mean really... filming a multimillion dollar movie about a game that's a mindless fps. I've read stories that "hollywood wants metroid", etc. Let's not forget about previous attempts like "Resident Evil", "Final Fantasy", "Street Fighter", and "Super Mario Bros."--Wait a minute; it's starting to make sense to me.

    Here's how it is:

    Microsoft is using this as a marketing ploy, and the movie's going to be wretched. I don't care what any of you Bungie-Fanboys say Halo is a shit-fer game with a shit-fer story and a shit-fer play style. Following this same tradition, Halo: the Movie is going to be a shit-fer movie that's nothing than a waste of my two hours.

    Halo (the game) is a complete waste of my time. I won't argue in its favor--unless you count its perdy graphics (big whoop).

    The movie is going to be just as big of a flaming pile of dogshit.

    I just want all of you (Halo advocates) to know that you are the reason Microsoft's got a friggin' monopoly. You people are the reason that Windows still sucks. You people are the reason they're muscling their way into the video game business.

    Its stupid, gullible people like you who buy Windows RG Third Edition with Service Pack 2 even though its the same crap that was released 10 years ago. You people are the ones who bought Halo 2 despite the lack of any quality innovation. Oh yay! Look my gun is a bigger gun than the last game. I have a (Dr. Evil Voice) "Laserbeam". You people are the reason musicians like Creed, Staind, and anything off of American Idol get record contracts. Its stupid people like you who feed this lowsy corporate world a falsified need to tell you what you like!

    Fine! Its your brainless life. Go ahead. Buy Halo 2. Go ahead. Buy the new Good Charlotte album, play anything EA makes, watch the Halo movie, devote yourself to mindless self-indulgence. Its your money. Really. Go ahead, Troll Me! Mod me down. I dare you.

    --
    Deja Vu
    n. 1. The sensation that you've read this very article before.
    1. Re:Great Movie. Two Thumbs Up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Note the section name: Games. Do you know why we buy Windows? Because it's the only OS that plays the latest games! I'll be very happy to move to Linux, as soon as every single one of the latest games play at full speed on it right out of the box. Until then, Winblows is my only real option. And the "Crap released 10 years ago" was DOS. Unless you are a Matrix person that can look at scrolling text and interpret photo-realistic images from it, then Winblows XP is a rather large leap forward.

      You people are the ones who bought Halo 2 despite the lack of any quality innovation. Oh yay! Look my gun is a bigger gun than the last game.


      What do you want? There's only so much they can do with a game! Just because it's a generic FPS doesn't make it a bad FPS by default. What FPS is ungeneric?
    2. Re:Great Movie. Two Thumbs Up! by bleaknik · · Score: 1

      Windows XP is not a rather large leap forward. Windows 2000 was an amazing piece of software, and to this day it is my preferred operating system. Unfortunately, many apps that I am regularly required to use force me to use Windows XP.

      "Photo-realistic" images generated by Windows XP are not EVEN THE RESULT OF WINDOWS XP'S TECHNOLOGIES (Direct X still runs on Windows 9x/2000). In fact, Direct X runs faster on the older Windows OSes because they have a smaller footprint.

      Halo 2 is a lowsy game. Have you actually played it? I mean, really. The controls are not tight. They are confusing to me, and frankly the game makes me too nauseous to want to try to familiarize myself with them.

      Hmm. Good FPS. Let me think. Last one I can think of... 007: Goldeneye for the N64. Yeah. It was simple, easy to play, difficult to master, and you were rewarded for not blowing everything up (except when you were trying to beat the Faculty in 2:10 to unlock the easter eggs...).

      Before then... Quake II was the first online FPS I played. I thought that was innovative, although I'm pretty sure it was the first online FPS.

      Before that... Wolfenstein 3D/Doom. Those were amazing games for their eras. Unfortunately, almost every FPS since then has been just another lowsy clone.

      And by that, I of course mean that Unreal 2006: Game of the Year of Counterstrike 3: The More Expensive Expansion Pack I hear has some great features... There's this new gun called the BFG 10,000.

      Jerk.

      --
      Deja Vu
      n. 1. The sensation that you've read this very article before.
    3. Re:Great Movie. Two Thumbs Up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Windows XP is not a rather large leap forward. Windows 2000 was an amazing piece of software, and to this day it is my preferred operating system. Unfortunately, many apps that I am regularly required to use force me to use Windows XP.

      Note that I am comparing DOS to Windows XP, not something like 2000 to XP. Text based to graphic based is a pretty large leap.
      "Photo-realistic" images generated by Windows XP are not EVEN THE RESULT OF WINDOWS XP'S TECHNOLOGIES (Direct X still runs on Windows 9x/2000). In fact, Direct X runs faster on the older Windows OSes because they have a smaller footprint.

      I never said that Windows XP was photo realistic, I was saying the images in the Matrix peoples' heads were.
      Halo 2 is a lowsy game. Have you actually played it? I mean, really. The controls are not tight. They are confusing to me, and frankly the game makes me too nauseous to want to try to familiarize myself with them.

      That's your opinion. You are entitled to it, and I am entitled to disagree with your opinion. I'll leave it at that.
      Hmm. Good FPS.

      I didn't ask for your list of good FPSs, I asked for ungeneric FPSs. All of the ones you named were good, but generic.
    4. Re:Great Movie. Two Thumbs Up! by bleaknik · · Score: 1

      I didn't ask for your list of good FPSs, I asked for ungeneric FPSs. All of the ones you named were good, but generic.

      Actually, Goldeneye, Doom/Wolfenstein, and the first FPS to support Multiplayer Online Gameplay were all quite innovative in their own ways. Unlike you, I have the balls to think outside the box, Mr. Coward.

      That's your opinion. You are entitled to it, and I am entitled to disagree with your opinion. I'll leave it at that.

      Ok. Maybe I was out of line with the complete and utter Halo 2 bash. I apologize... but its still a shitacular game.

      Doom ran on my DOS box. In fact... Doom ran pretty well. In fact... technically speaking, you can run some fancy 3D games on a DOS machine, assuming someone were to actually take the time and write the code to utilize the new 3D graphics processors on the old software. Still not something you need Windows to do. See, my good Anonymous Friend, there are these things called hardware drivers that are used to seperate the basic operating system from the hardware. This allows me to use the same graphics card on ... Windows 98 or Windows XP. I can also use this same graphics card on Linux (or Mac, if the hardware is compatible). On top of the drivers, the OS usually has some sort of API. For those who don't know what that means, it stands for "application program interface". Using an API (Direct X for example), programmers can write a game that is (theoretically) Operating System and Hardware agnostic (since I'm using large words, I've conveniently listed links for you, Mr. Coward).

      Finally, Mr. Coward, please realize that there are help for people like you. I mean, I think most of us realized that the "Weirdo Text" in the Matrix was just another Hollywood special effect.

      ;)

      --
      Deja Vu
      n. 1. The sensation that you've read this very article before.
    5. Re:Great Movie. Two Thumbs Up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, Goldeneye, Doom/Wolfenstein, and the first FPS to support Multiplayer Online Gameplay were all quite innovative in their own ways. Unlike you, I have the balls to think outside the box, Mr. Coward.

      OK, so they are good and innovative, but they are still generic. Heck, I've played those games myself and enjoyed them, but they never really go beyond any other games in the category. Sort of like, oh, I don't know, HALO!

      I apologize... but its still a shitacular game.

      Wow, you need to resort to words like shitacular to prove your points, inferring that you have no real reason to back it up. Try saying things without those kind of words, it makes your point firmer. Also give reasons for why you hate the game, it makes it sound more thought out instead of a reflex. Use these tips and maybe fewer people like me will come along and annoy you.

      That third paragraph didn't really relate to anything I said.

      Finally, Mr. Coward, please realize that there are help for people like you. I mean, I think most of us realized that the "Weirdo Text" in the Matrix was just another Hollywood special effect.(Grammar error bolded for you, Mr. Halo Hater.)

      Yes, I'm sure there is help out there for people like me. That "Wierdo text" is a special effect, but it also played a part in the story. There is a quote where Cypher commented on that text with "All I see now is blonde, brunette, redhead." That is what I based my previous little comment on. This inferred that he saw some sort of photo realistic image in his mind from that text. DOS is largely text based, so I used that connection to my advantage. I used it as an analogy.

      On a side note I refuse to make an account for security reasons, and because I'm a generally disagreeable person. So far from my conversation with you I am thinking that I would fit in rather well...

      Maybe I should stop replying, it's getting rather annoying replying to you. I want to put this to rest, but I doubt I'll be allowed to do that. I think I'm starting a tame flame war...I like Halo, you don't, blah blah blah... This argument is sort of stupid.

    6. Re:Great Movie. Two Thumbs Up! by C0rinthian · · Score: 1

      Holy flamebait batman.

  23. Re:Why not just pull a Square and do it themselves by TrippTDF · · Score: 1

    Funny you should say that... my last job was at a talent agency, and I used to work with some of those guys. (The guy you are thinking of is Ashton Smith, he also does all the NBC promos, or maybe Don La Fontaine, who did a lot of work in the 90's, and now does a lot fo Fox promos).

    Those Movie Trailer guys make between $1,200 and $2,000 for a 15 minute session. I once saw a guy make my salary in 24 hours....