Upgrade Your G4 Cube to a Pentium M Processor
reklusband writes "This report tells of a company that has released a processor upgrade for G4 cubes; this upgrade is in the form of a Pentium M. The cube becomes Windows + Linux, x86-blah compatible."
For the bottom-end of the same price ($399), you would have more than enough to buy a similarly equipped PC133 bus computer, used. And since your G4 is probably used as well, why have one machine when you can have two? Honestly, old PC-compatible machines running w/ a 133 Mhz FSB (*no* DDR, etc.) are fairly cheap these days.
...
So in other words you take your Mac, that in G4 form probably still works fine with OSX, put in a new motherboard and processor. And now you can use the same BOX as a PC and run Linux.
Not so much an upgrade as using a G4 case, and in terms of an upgrade... So sort of like taking a PDP-11 box, keeping the disc controller and network controller, putting in a Pentium processor, rolling your own Linux and saying "I've upgraded a PDP-11".
NO YOU HAVEN'T because it DOESN'T WORK with the old software.
I would dare try and get my Wife to switch from a Mac onto Linux, that would hugely downgrade my quality of life.
An Eye for an Eye will make the whole world blind - Gandhi
And that's old news, look at the post date: Monday, February 28 2005 @ 10:27 AM EST.
Bullshit...
not upgrading? it's a speed upgrade. whatever you think g4's in cubes are not faster than pentium-m's available now, as such, if you intend to run linux or even winxp it is an upgrade.
and the case of g4 cube is cool - which is why you would do this upgrade(when you've deemed that it's too slow to act as your desktop anyways and would like a linux/windows box with some beef)..
world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
Just asking.
...the G4 Cube is already capable of running Linux.
Posted with Mozilla
Two words: device drivers.
We've seen lots in the last few days about Apple and Intel and some blurring of the lines, but in all this I haven't seen much related to drivers. Think about it for a second. Whether you install Windows on a Mac or OS X on an x86 system, is anything (besides the very basics maybe) going to work?
In order to get OS X as popular on x86 as Windows or Linux it's going to require a LOT of driver writing by both Apple and other vendors. Unless Apple comes up with a way to get Windows-native drivers to work (or Linux I suppose, but Windows has a better full-support native driver base) OS X is going to suffer many of the same problems Linux does with hardware support, specifically products that are not mainstream.
Or am I wrong and is there a quick and easy way to build a native "plug-'n-pray" driver base such as Windows XP has? Love it or hate it, you have to admit that XP really does have great native support for tons of stuff, a feature which is a huge plus for a lot of people. Usually, it really does Just Work (TM)
"What do you despise? By this are you truly known." --Princess Irulan, Manual of Muad'Dib
/)