Slashdot Mirror


Why Don't Companies Release Specs?

Mhrmnhrm asks: "With the recent activism by the OpenBSD crew focusing on release of documentation from the likes of Adaptec, Intel, and others, I'm left to wonder: why do companies insist on believing that by denying access to the specs, they somehow gain an advantage? It's not like telling a programmer how to communicate with the underlying hardware is going to tell them how it (the PCB/silicon) was designed, so why make this information secret?"

3 of 469 comments (clear)

  1. Hahahah by jdub712 · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Oh Yeah, 1st

  2. Re:Because it would cost them money by Tim+C · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    How can the only reply to a comment be redundant?

    Ffs mods, get a clue! Troll or Flamebait maybe (although it's true), but redundant?

    For what it's worth, that's pretty-much exactly what I was going to say. What a lot of people here don't realise is that those lost sales may not represent enough cash to be worth the extra effort, even if they were all realised.

  3. Re:Because it would cost them money by elmegil · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Because, you know, you can always judge someone by their posting on slashdot. Your filter is a bit fine, methinks. But don't let that stop you from feeling all toasty warm and nice because you can flame someone from behind the safety of your keyboard.

    --
    7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001