NetBSD Makes Plea for 'Cold, Hard Cash'
daria42 writes "NetBSD has e-mailed its user community asking for donations. "There are many upgrades we'd like to make to the NetBSD project infrastructure," said the e-mail, "but which we cannot make because, to be blunt, our project is poor. Not poor in innovation nor poor in developer resources nor poor in features -- poor in cold, hard cash, the kind we need to buy hardware that would let us better serve our users." The e-mail pointed out while sister projects OpenBSD and FreeBSD had received tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars in donations, NetBSD had up until now been embarrassed to ask its users for money."
We know already
While I don't use NetBSD directly, I am confident that I have benefited from the NetBSD project.
I've already donated $20.00 US, and if 2 in 1000 slashdot readers did the same, they would met their goal and we won't see this story again.
OK, OK... I _will_ donate again... :-P
Thank you Slashdot, dupes in the BSD section; well, at least they post news twise as often.
This story is just like those NPR pledge drives that keep coming around again, asking for money.
Intron: the portion of DNA which expresses nothing useful.
The GCC compiler has recently dropped support for the VAX architecture, so unfortunately, I'm stuck at the current version and probably will stay there until 2038.
(and no, don't mod me as "funny"...I have a bunch of VAX systems and I run NetBSD on them)
TDz.
They should convince hot naked chicks to wear BSD demon temporary tattoos and then sell the pics. Instant hit with geeks. Money comes in.
If my grammar and spelling are off, I am [distracted/tired/careless] (take your pick)
If you have are an admin, or your company uses linux or anything please donate. So much of the cross-architecture, and device driver support for the BSD's and linux comes from NetBSD you'd be surprised. I gave 50 just cause I remember back in the day when they were the only group to support my old SGI Indigo2, and they still lead in most wierd architecture support.
If you have a wierd or rare architecture they probably support it, or have something that can be hacked to work, and that kind of resourcefulness is why we aren't all running windows 3.3, TPM Borg edition.
The first rule of USENET is you do not talk about USENET.