Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

IBM Turns to Open Source Development

Posted by Zonk on from the turning-up-in-lots-of-places dept.

mmmbop writes "'Is open source changing the way that software is made? It is at IBM. BetaNews sat down with Doug Heintzman, IBM Software Group's VP of Strategy and Technology, to discuss the adoption of a hybrid development model called Community Source that combines the best elements of the open source model with decades of IBM programming practice - avoiding a top down approach that IBM says could make Microsoft's Longhorn obsolete upon arrival.' A long read, but well worth it."

2 of 142 comments (clear)

  1. IBM: good for open source by Sheetrock · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I've worked with IBM products for a long time, and I think of all the computer companies their adoption of open source techniques for software development surprises me least.

    Traditionally IBM's methodologies have been very close to (and predate) that of open source, which derived much of its culture and programming mindset from that of IBM or Bell Labs. Their documentation as compared to other hardware/software developers has always encouraged the user to learn about and extend the environment in which they work rather than supporting only a superficial "click here, then there" mentality.

    IBM has always been good for open source. It makes sense that open source can be good for IBM as well.

    --

    Try not. Do or do not, there is no try.
    -- Dr. Spock, stardate 2822-3.




  2. Re:Seriously buzzword compliant by MrAnnoyanceToYou · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Heh. Isn't IBM just practicing to become a fully consultant-based company there? That seems to be their plan:
    1. make the best software in the world using whatever tools are at hand
    2. open source it, (automatic, considering how 1 would have to be done)
    3. and support it. (of course, this is where 'profit' would normally go, but yeeah.)

    Looks like a better plan to me than other stuff.

    Just thought I'd summarize, 'cause you didn't read the whole article. :P

    --
    My little site.