Slashdot Mirror


Half Of Businesses Still Use Windows 2000

bonch writes "An AssetMetrix study shows that half of business are still running Windows 2000 four years after the release of Windows XP, and that usage of Windows 2000 has only decreased by 4% since 2003. Microsoft will officially stop supporting Windows 2000 by the end of this month, offering one last update rollup later this year. Windows XP's slower adoption illustrates Microsoft's difficulty in competing with the popularity of its own software platform, and makes it more difficult for Microsoft to convince people to upgrade when Longhorn is released late next year."

10 of 640 comments (clear)

  1. Why upgrade? by alanjstr · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I have not run into a compelling reason to upgrade from Win2k to XP. Win2k has been very stable for me. It seems that my XP boxes get more security patches than my Win2k boxes. I don't need all the eye candy of XP.

  2. Good enough wins. by Colin+Smith · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Certainly in the mass market. Why upgrade if you're not getting any significant benefit and possibly causing yourself huge amounts of grief?

    --
    Deleted
  3. What new features? by asciiRider · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Here is a list of the new features in XP. Notice the use of words like "Enhanced, Improved, Greater, Easier" -

    For the life of me, I can't figure out why anybody would consider moving thousands of workstations to XP. The only thing I can come up with is the built in firewall which can be controlled via group policy.

    User interface improvements? Big deal, so now it looks like nintendo. Better help? Users call the help desk. 64 bit? Big deal...

    -Intelligent User Interface
    -Comprehensive Digital Media Support
    -Greater Application and Device Compatibility
    -Enhanced File and Print Services
    -Improved Networking and Communications
    -Integrated Help and Support Services
    -Improved Mobile Computing
    -Reliability Improvements
    -Stronger Security Protections
    -Easier Manageability
    -64-Bit Support
    -Looking Forward: The Microsoft .NET Platform

  4. MS lifecycle says it has to be by Bad+to+the+Ben · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It has to be released then according to MS: http://www.microsoft.com/windows/lifecycle/default .mspx

    Check out the table. Notice how the licencing end dates run out at the end of this year for OEMs and next year for system builders? Longhorn has to fill that spot or the contracts need to be renegotiated.

  5. Not only that by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 4, Interesting

    WinXP is laid out all screwy too, makes it really hard to configure or use. I don't think it's any more stable either. Also, the "eye candy" you refer to is absolutely garish - it's like they got a retarded monkey to try to imitate Mac OSX. First thing I did on my work computer (which is XP unfortunately) was switch the style to classic to save my eyes and some of my sanity.

  6. MS are in a bit of a pickle really by zoney_ie · · Score: 4, Interesting

    With the eye-candy disabled, XP is just a more up-to-date Win2K - just as stable/unstable really.

    The interesting thing is - what % of businesses are XP? Even if MS get some of the Win2K people to go to XP - how are they going to get the XP people to go to Longhorn? It isn't going to happen extensively!!! MS are actually possibly more screwed (at least in terms of getting people to Longhorn) if they get Win2K people to go to XP at this stage.

    And it's still long time to wait for direct Win2K -> Longhorn upgrades (2 years? More? -including evaluation/install time for businesses).

    --
    -- *~()____) This message will self-destruct in 5 seconds...
  7. Little problems in XP not in 2k by Psykechan · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I like Windows XP. However, I just don't understand why they did some of the things that they did with it.

    1. MSN Messenger auto running. Sure in a corp environment you can just have it disabled but it's annoying for small businesses that just don't have the IT resources to do it.

    2. OS popups. Notifications above the tray that bring you the most inane messages ever. Try plugging in a USB2 device into a system that only has USB1.1 and follow the popup's instructions. Who the hell thought this was a good idea? I'm sure this is from MS's "usability" group that brought us Clippy and Search Mutt.

    3. Window pane focus changes. This one I just don't understand. In 2k, if I open Windows Explorer in folder view, I can use the scroll wheel to scroll the pane that the mouse is over. In XP, I have to click the pane first to scroll. This probably doesn't affect many people but for those that it does, it is super annoying.

    Since 2k still works for most people, I can see why XP would have such a problem replacing it.

  8. From AssetMetrix by solomonrex · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "Windows 95 and Windows 98 were reduced from a collective 28% to less than 5%;
    Windows NT popularity was reduced from 13.5% to about 10%; and
    Windows XP became the most popular operating system for companies with fewer than 250 PCs."

    I don't think ME was ever popularly deployed in businesses. I shudder to think about it. Win2k was available then.

  9. Its Microsoft NOT knowing their customers. by crovira · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Make that not knowing their customers' customers.

    While it may be fine for a Microsoft customer (Don't laugh. So its like a Mafia customer. They make them an offer...) like Dell to sell all the machines with XP pre-installed we (a Dell customer to the tune of several 10K units per year) just strip that puppy off the machine and install a plain vanilla Win2k from a CD because its absolute murder on the software when something changes.

    If the OS changes and breaks something in our software, its a lot tougher and more expensive for us to fix (when its even possible. We probably won't be able to rehire the same team and most of the, uh, interesting documentation was done by osmosis.)

    Microsoft's XP can sit on the shelf 'till the Longhorn cows come home.

    Win2K is curently fine. We wouldn't even have gotten off NT4.0 if they hadn't 'end-of-life'd it. It did what was required and stayed out of the way.

    If that hurts Microsoft's pocket book, maybe they should get into the toy business.

    --
    MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
  10. Activation by phone by King_TJ · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Yes, I've had to do this a number of times, actually. But one problem is, after you read off the long code over the phone to them, you may or may not get an activation key back.

    I'm not quite sure what the limitations are, but Microsoft obviously has measures in place to limit the number of times someone can re-activate XP that way. I've had customers who radically changed and upgraded their PCs a number of times over the last few years. When they had a drive crash and no good backups, it was up to me to swap out their drive and re-install XP and their apps from scratch. Their key refused to activate again, because apparently, MS decided it had been re-activated too often already and they put some kind of "block" on the code.