Slashdot Mirror


DivX 6.0 is Out

mattspammail writes "DivX 6.0 is out. Even Tom's Hardware has an article on it. According to TFA, this should be a big step up in compression and features. DVD-style menus are now an option."

17 of 366 comments (clear)

  1. Direct Link by zoloto · · Score: 3, Informative

    http://download.divx.com/divx/DivXPlay.exe

    ANyways, this has been out for not too long and it really is a great new release unlike many past versions.

  2. Decoding DivX by paul248 · · Score: 4, Informative

    I've always found ffdshow to be a much less crapware-like codec for watching DivX video. Not sure how it handles the new v6 stuff though.

    1. Re:Decoding DivX by Jherek+Carnelian · · Score: 4, Informative

      Are you kidding? All my attempts to use alpha version of ffdshow on windows have resulted in all kinds of weirdness

      You just have to get a stable build. I use a build from october of 2004 or so (don't have it right in front of me) and it is significantly faster than either the divx or xvid decoders. It is rock-stable solid.

      Plus the other ffdshow filters like scaling, noise removal, deblocking, logo-killer, etc can make a HUGE improvement in the final quality of the rendered image - especially for low-rez sources like most divx encodes. Might not make so much of a difference on a 17" monitor but on a 100" front projector the difference is night and day.

  3. Re:DivX by no+haters · · Score: 3, Informative

    That will never happen. The article doesn't go into much detail aside from the press releases from the DivX group, but as far as I can tell, it still doesn't support multiple audio streams, like OGM and it's not open source either.

    There will always be multiple codecs and file formats that correspond to different uses. DivX will be great for what the company is positioning it to do, which is provide a smaller, easier to transfer format with enough bells and whistles to cut into the highly-profitable DVD market.

  4. Tom's Hardware is slipping. by Adam+Zweimiller · · Score: 5, Informative

    I was immensly disappointed with the Tom's Hardware article. It was incredibly shallow and vague, a significant change for them. It was more marketing/press release than it was informative and objective review or introduction. If I wanted that I would read the information on divx.com. For those of you who want a mor technical and in-depth discussion, look no further than the Doom 9 Forums

    --
    mmm...muffins
    1. Re:Tom's Hardware is slipping. by Vellmont · · Score: 4, Informative

      Agreed. Toms Hardware is nothing but a big ad for the products it reviews. It was a good site years ago, but now it's just an advertising site with little integrity left.

      --
      AccountKiller
  5. XviD by nukem996 · · Score: 3, Informative

    If I recall correctly XviD is the OpenSource version of DivX. Im wondering how long untill they are fully compatible with DivX 6.

  6. Re:Nooo! by Idimmu+Xul · · Score: 4, Informative

    The Neap0litan XviD-Ogg-MKV Walkthrough is totally awesome and shows you in a step by step manner how to create an XviD/Ogg/MKV from a DVD complete with subtitles, it is beyond awesome.

    --
    The problem with slashdot is that most of its users were bullied and stuffed into lockers as kids!
  7. Re:DMF? by Apotsy · · Score: 5, Informative
    Quicktime is proprietary

    Not really. The container format is pretty well documented, especially since it is part of the MPEG-4 standard. Sometimes you might encounter movies that use a Quicktime container but use a proprietary codec (like Sorenson), but that doesn't make the container itself proprietary.

    ISO MPEG - is this even a container?

    Yes, the MPEG-4 standard defines a container format, based on the Quicktime format (see above).

  8. Re:Recommend your alternatives here by m50d · · Score: 3, Informative

    The flipside of that is that if it doesn't support something (IIRC it can only do one of mms and rtsp streams) there's no way to get it to. I prefer media player classic, then just get the k-lite codec pack. Probably comes to less download over all.

    --
    I am trolling
  9. Re:Compression by wfberg · · Score: 3, Informative
    Divx is used for transfrerring over the internet, so the smaller the file is, the better.


    Then use H.264 instead of DivX. It's smaller. It's also supported in QuickTime 7, Nero Showtime uses it, ffmpeg and vlc (beta) use it, and there's even a windows codec floating about (Moonlight-Elecard).


    Me, I like DivX/Xvid better because it doesn't take as much CPU as H.264 (AKA AVC/Mpeg 4 part 10) - also, my DVD player can play DivX/Xvid just fine.

    --
    SCO employee? Check out the bounty
  10. DivX 6 is not an MPEG-4 codec anymore by Vroem · · Score: 3, Informative

    DivX 5 was an MPEG-4 codec. As are XviD, 3ivx, ffmpeg's MPEG-4, QuickTime's MPEG-4, and lots of other codecs. They are all interoperable (if you don't enable extravagant mpeg features).

    Divx 6 turns out to be just another proprietary video codec that nobody needs. I'm sure it will do better than h.264 since it doesn't comply to any spec. And they where able to look at lots of perfectly working "sample code".

  11. Just tested a DivX 6 file on my DVP642 by kennedy · · Score: 5, Informative

    Ok, so i downloaded the clip of that star wars fan film from the divx site, burned to a cd-r and tossed it into my philips DVP642 - it decoded the video with *no* issue, however it did skip past the menu that you will see on a windows system with the DivX Player.

    no need to worry!

  12. Re:Nooo! by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 3, Informative

    Blame the shop-lifters, not the manufacturers.

    --
    You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
  13. Re:DivX 6 is Out...for Windows 2000/XP. by varmittang · · Score: 3, Informative

    h.264 is the new MPG codec. Ratified as part of the MPEG-4 standard (MPEG-4 Part 10), this ultra-efficient technology gives you excellent results across a broad range of bandwidths, from 3G for mobile devices to iChat AV for video conferencing to HD for broadcast and DVD. http://www.apple.com/quicktime/technologies/h264/ Apple ships it with Quicktime 7, which is avaliable for Windows as a preview over at Apples site yet, and it is just........ you really just got to see it at work. I only encode all my TV shows I capture into h.264 since EyeTV made it an option. Its just got such high quality for small file size. Go get quicktime, then go to the trailer section, watch Batman Begins in 720p, you will see what everyone is talking about.

    --
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
    12345
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
  14. Re:Does anyone still actually prefer divx over xvi by coolsva · · Score: 4, Informative

    FYI, what the parent says is the history of Divx. An open source project called OpenDivx was started to extend/enhance the 'illegal DivX:)'. Once it reached a critical mass and a good code base, DivxNetworks apparently decided to allegedly take up the code base and convert it to a closed source Divx codec. In theory, OpenDivx was left to continue beyond version 4.0Alpha, but it never did. People rather started a GPL version and called it XVID
    As of now, Divx vx Xvid is like BSD vs Linux. Both are equally good, neck in neck. Only difference is, Xvid cannot, by law, distributed as executable. MPEG4 is patented and Xvid is only distributed as source (except by good folks like Nic & Koepi)

  15. Re:Does anyone still actually prefer divx over xvi by NuShrike · · Score: 3, Informative

    Probably more accurate to compare it as BSD versus SunOS pre-AT&T lawsuit at the time of the split. It's more like BSD v Linux now.

    XviD doesn't pay fees to the mp4 people so it's not legal as an executable.