Slashdot Mirror


House Limits Patriot Act Rules on Library Records

xerid writes "From CNN.COM: "WASHINGTON (AP) -- The House voted Wednesday to block the FBI and the Justice Department from using the Patriot Act to search library and book store records. Despite a veto threat from President Bush, lawmakers voted 238-187 to block the part of the anti-terrorism law that allows the government to investigate the reading habits of terror suspects.""

28 of 499 comments (clear)

  1. I know this will be repeated alot by Dance_Dance_Karnov · · Score: 4, Insightful

    but they should man up and throw the whole damn thing out

  2. Still Payin With Cash by blueZhift · · Score: 4, Funny

    This is good news, but I'll still be buying 2600 with cash, thank you very much!

    Err, not that I read that, that is...uh yeah...

    1. Re:Still Payin With Cash by Bimo_Dude · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I don't know... The way I look at it, I have been and will continue to pay for all of my books with credit cards. I want those bastards to know what I read, and that I disagree with their policies. IMHO, it's important that we stand up to them and exercise what little freedom we have left. If we don't, then the gov't will see it as an indication that we either don't care, or are not paying attention and will continue to walk all over us. No more.

      --
      "Teleporting Rodents with D-Cell Battery Displacement" theory -- IgnoramusMaximus (692000)
    2. Re:Still Payin With Cash by SacredNaCl · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Considering all of the provisions that are in this, and how extremely overbroad almost every single one of them is and unneeded most of them are, that the only thing congress finds fault with is the library and bookstore provisions is quite disturbing.

      I think we need to clean house. The white house, and both houses of congress.

      Electronic communications provisions would have ranked a lot higher for me, as well as banking & financial provisions, and detention provisions, ability to issue "secret" warrants, sneak and peak... All of those ranked a lot above worrying about my library card book list.

      --
      Freedom is merely privilege extended unless enjoyed by one and all.
  3. Thank you, librarians by Bimo_Dude · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Even though it's likely that Bush will veto this, I still am really thankful that we have such outspoken librarians in this country. They have really been helpful in trying to protect people's privacy, and have also done a lot to bring privacy issues to light in the eyes of the public.

    Thank you!!!!!

    --
    "Teleporting Rodents with D-Cell Battery Displacement" theory -- IgnoramusMaximus (692000)
    1. Re:Thank you, librarians by Bimo_Dude · · Score: 4, Insightful
      That's a good point. I always thought that there would just be another "terrorist" incident just before the 2008 enections, and martial law would be declared, thus keeping Bush in office indefinitely. I guess this is a cleaner, more permanent way to accomplish the implementation of [what I perceive to be] the new dictatorship of the USA. We really, really need to remove everybody in the House, Senate, and White House immediately, and restore the rights of the people.

      A person I know who studied PoliSci told me that most dictatorships and other oppressive regimes start out as democracies or representative republics. The laws are changed slowly over time to consolidate the power and money into the hands of fewer and fewer people, as well as slowly eroding the rights if the average citizen. Eventually, this leads to a whole different type of gov't and the people never really noticed the changes until it was too late. They were too busy being distracted by bread and circuses (now it's Michael Jackson and Britney Spears).

      /rant

      --
      "Teleporting Rodents with D-Cell Battery Displacement" theory -- IgnoramusMaximus (692000)
  4. Next stage (The Tin Foil Hat Stage) by frankthechicken · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I wonder when the government will require everyone to have a bank account, ban bank notes, and require all purchases to be made by card.

    All in the interests of removing profits by terrorists through counterfeiting, and of course to keep track of terrorists purchasing habits.

  5. One step forward, two steps back. by King_of_Prussia · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Read the summary for this proposed bill. Future seems a little shaky now doesn't it -- How does "Darth Bush" sound to you? (Amendment 22 is concerned with that little thing about only having two terms as president, for those non USoAians)









    PS (OT) -- is anyone else having trouble with IP bans on slashdot? I get 2 downmods on apost and suddenly I'm IP banned! I only got this posted through Tor, but that's not that much better as slashdot blocks most of the nodes there too. Any help?

    --

    Making the moon less necessary since 1998.

    1. Re:One step forward, two steps back. by Ford+Prefect · · Score: 4, Funny

      Darth Stupideous sounds better

      No, no, no!

      Everyone* knows that the naming rules for Darths are to take an English word beginning with 'in', remove the 'in' and replace it with 'Darth'. 'In-Vader', 'In-Sidious', and all that.

      So, for your Great Leader Bush, I suggest Darth Coherent. Or maybe Darth Continent.

      Darth Credulous?

      (Spider Blog: No sign of the spider since last update - I think it's gone... sniff!)

      --
      Tedious Bloggy Stuff - hooray?
  6. Outspoken librarians? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Shhhh!

  7. Librarians are with the terrorists :( by Adult+film+producer · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's only a matter of time until the Al Quaeda uses our public library system against us. Learning the hidden secrets of the atom bomb and building one, the end result will be campaign of terror against freedom loving people like myself. It's time to take a stand against socialist librarians across america. Who's with me? Go to your local library and steal any books relating the construction of atom bombs, chemical weapons and sheep loving. Please.

  8. uh.. oh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Those who dare to replace some security with freedom do not deserve security at all.

    (I think George Washington said that...)

    1. Re:uh.. oh... by aussie_a · · Score: 5, Funny

      Go outside. See a plane flying overhead? That's how far the joke went over your head.

  9. Perhaps we shouldn't be so rash.. by ciroknight · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm not saying I like the Patriot Act, but I really think that we should be rational in our removal of this disturbance, as we weren't rational with our creation of it in the first place.

    The Patriot Act was a fast acting, country sweeping bill that made it to law simply because the governing agencies that wanted it, wanted it now, and nobody was going to stand in their way in the wake of what had just happened in our country.

    That being said, if we act too strongly and remove the whole thing at once, we are setting ourselves up to the whole situation again, perhaps worse; next time they will have access to our bank statements, our cars (onboard nav computers telling the government where we are going, where we've been, etc), our schools, our whole livelihood could be changed.

    That being said, if we are slow about pulling this law back out, and amending our laws so that such a catastrophy like 9/11 and the Patriot Act won't happen again, we will be more prepared for the next government incursion into privacy.

    The whole thing needs to go. But we need to be able to explicitly say why each piece of it should go, and until we are unable to do that legally, the Patriot Act must stand as to keep what freedoms we still have. I have full confidence in our government to restore our constitution to its former glory, but we can't do that by making hair-triggered decisions like the Patriot Act, or its repeal.

    --
    "Victory means exit strategy, and it's important for the President to explain to us what the exit strategy is." G.W.Bush
    1. Re:Perhaps we shouldn't be so rash.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm not saying I like the Patriot Act, but I really think that we should be rational in our removal of this disturbance, as we weren't rational with our creation of it in the first place.

      I strongly disagree! For three reasons:
      1. Although enacted as an irrational response to terrorist threat, it has not been used to bring down one terrorist since enacted.
      2. Despite all sorts of assurances while the bill was being discussed, the PA has been used against drug dealers, tax evaders and even the wayward Democratic members of the Texas legislature. This is not a "terrorist" bill; it is a bill that has been used almost exclusively against American citizens!
      3. Now that Congress has actually grown a spine and won't be threatened with being unpatriotic to cram anything through, it is time to send a clear message to Bush et al that the Bill of Rights is more than just toilet paper!

  10. Re:Nice by justforaday · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If this goes on much longer it will be a simple matter to apply the "T" label to anyone for any reason at all under the strictest secrecy possible and they won't even have to tell you about it until it's too late.

    I believe that's the whole point of this supposed "war on terra."

    --
    I'll turn into a supernova and burn up everything. Well I'll turn into a black little hole and you'll turn into string.
  11. Surely it depends on context by karzan · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What the Patriot Act ought to do is act as a signal that something has gone dreadfully wrong in the American system--and therefore must be changed. For one thing, the fact that so many Americans did not oppose it, and were so easily led into accepting a complete contravention of the constitution through a manipulation of irrational fear (what if the terrorists attack my house??) shows us that there is a deeper problem in American culture. No kind of democracy can really work if people are that uncritical and deferential.

    Removing the Patriot Act is going to be incredibly difficult. Any process that does so, whether it is gradual or sudden, is going to first require a change in the whole political and cultural atmosphere, because there are so many people who genuinely believe measures like the Patriot Act are rational. So anything that removes the Patriot Act is going to do more than just remove the Patriot Act (it's not going to just be scrapped by a Democratic administration)

    Whether you do it gradually or suddenly, if the Patriot Act were to be removed by representatives with little cultural change happening, then the deeper causal problems would still be there. But I think we can just as effectively remove it suddenly as we can slowly, if that process is carried out by just that--'We'. Because you're right--until the underlying factors are addressed, there is always the danger of this happening again ... and again.

    But I'm not sure how much that has to do with the *speed* of removing it.

    1. Re:Surely it depends on context by wcdw · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I have several problems with the so-called Patriot Act -- as well as the efforts now undderway to extend it past its original 5-year expiration.

      Primarily among these include:

      1) Lack of judicial review. If you want to search my house, get a d*mn judge to approve a warrant. Doing it because "you suspect I'm a terrorist" is just flat crap.

      2) Removal of freedom of speech. If I DO receive certain requests/requirements under the PA, I am *required* to comply with them, and *prohibited by law* from talking about them. And now it seems that if I *do* mention that the FBI raided my house, I can go to jail for at least a year.

      3) In general, the PA goes *way* too far. Any bill which must shroud its activities in a cloud of secrecy is NOT the intent of the people who wrote our constitution. Secret pogroms smack of Nazi Germany. Of course, so does the USA, today.

      --
      If you're not living on the edge, you're just taking up space!
    2. Re:Surely it depends on context by Shajenko42 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      What makes you think a judge is going to protect you from anything? Who controls the judges?
      If judicial review is so worthless, why are many law enforcement officials so intent on ridding us of it?
  12. Re:But... by njcoder · · Score: 4, Funny

    who cares. Now I can go back to buying "The Catcher in the Rye" without worrying about silent black helicopters.

  13. Look at the Puppet! by aluminumcube · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And with that, the Patriot Act II will pass with flying colors.

    Sort of like globalization, the overwhelming majority of people who get their panties in a bunch about how evil the Patriot Act is really don't have a bloody clue about what the Patriot Act actually does. The 'Library Statute,' while hardly ever used, happens to be one of the most easily lambasted portions of the legislation because the academics and intellectuals on the left hold libraries to be sacred places of privacy.

    The fact of the matter is, the Patriot act was hardly ever used to collect library records and the Patriot act supporters know it. Any prospective terrorist is far better served by looking up public records and using the internet. Seriously, if you are a well financed terrorist who poses an actual threat to this country, would you have EVER gone to the library?

    By removing the Library bit from the Patriot act, Congress can look like they actually care while still allowing the meat of the Patriot act to be renewed, if not even adding a bit more to it.

    1. Re:Look at the Puppet! by harks · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I've heard this so often. "That part of the law is hardly ever used, why do you care so much?" (of course, if you don't need that part of the law then why have it?) Then, after a few years, they start using it. Then the pitch becomes, "But that's been part of the law for years now and has never been a problem. Why do you care now?"

  14. Re:But... by will_die · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If that is a really scare for you answer this question.
    Why are you not upset that some government agency(library) or some private agency(bookstore) is recording your purchases, keeping them linked to your information, and not destroying them after they have ensure you have returned the book or your payment has been approved?
    There is no library section of the US PATRIOT act there is only an area that allows the FBI to request from a business records under certain circumstations and only after approved by a judge, and that was an extention of when the same thing could be done with the same records, just not under thoses circumstances.

  15. Don't get too excited by stinerman · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Apparently, since Bush is threatening to veto (although he has never used his veto to date) this legislation unless they put the provision in question back in the bill, they will do exactly that in conference committee.

    A poster on the Daily Kos made mention about it, but I can't find a direct link.

  16. don't blindly vote your reps out by dangermouse · · Score: 4, Informative
    We really, really need to remove everybody in the House, Senate, and White House immediately, and restore the rights of the people.

    Not everyone. My Representative, John Lewis (Georgia 5th district), has his head screwed on straight. He voted against the PATRIOT Act, and I've been watching him (via his Plogress feed) come down on the right side of every major issue.

    I'm sure there are others like him. Don't throw out any babies with the bath water.

  17. Eh, big deal.. by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 4, Funny

    I learned a long time ago to buy all my copies of "Catcher in the Rye" with cash..

  18. Not True by John+Seminal · · Score: 5, Interesting
    The House voted Wednesday to block the FBI and the Justice Department from using the Patriot Act to search library and book store records. Despite a veto threat from President Bush, lawmakers voted 238-187 to block the part of the anti-terrorism law that allows the government to investigate the reading habits of terror suspects.

    I don't trust government. I think they are liars. They distract the public, to make everyone think they are doing the work of ALL people. Well, not even all, but those who work and have families.

    How about this for an idea? Members of Congress hear the outrage of people, about big brother in the library keeping tabs on what you read. So in a public showdown, congress repeals the provision of the patriot act which allows government to obtain your reading list.

    Act II. People forget about the other provisions of the patriot act where the FBI can search records without a court warrent, records like your bank accounts, or even your home. And even after the search, they don't tell you!!

    Act III. The Education Bill is passed. What is in the Education Bill? A provision which requires libraries to keep tabs on what people read, "to better spend tax dollars".

    Act IV. People disappear. Kinda like Guantanamo bay, but Americans this time. Of course, no lawyers allowed. Okay, government will cave, we'll give you a military lawyer.

    Act V. Hell folks, if it gets to Act V, we're all doomed. Some say we already are.

    SOLUTIONS

    #1) We take all money out of politics.

    As long as public office can be purchased, we are screwed. Money is being concentrated in the hands of a small minority. If it takes $7 million per Senate seat, and some believe that the NY seat will be a multiple of that amount, then who can run? Even congressional seats are over $1 million each.

    If all money was removed from political contests, then it would be a level playing field for ideas. The people own the airways, we could order 10 hours for each candidate to recieve public airtime. But we don't even get ideas, we get marketing.

    I think the USA is doomed. The sad part is we are causing war in every other part of the world. We want to bring to them capitalism, so the same system of buying elections can become possible.

    --

    Rosco: "If brains were gunpowder, Enos couldn't blow his nose."

  19. Pogroms were NOT Nazi or secret. by crovira · · Score: 4, Interesting

    They were a staple of Russian life. Keep the [others] fearing for their lives by killing a few (or more). Other is in brackets because they weren't killing just Jews.

    The Nazis were not particarly secretive about what they were doing. They just had more propaganda about it. (The parts they didn't want you focusing on.)

    As for the patriot act... Imagine a world where you CANT get away with anything, on any side. Oh the horror. The HORROR!

    --
    MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.