Vietnam Courts Microsoft and Vice Versa
wbren writes "Bill Gates and Vietnam's Prime Minister Phan Van Khai have signed two 'memoranda of understanding' regarding Microsoft's presence in Vietnam, according to this AP story. They met Monday at Microsoft's Redmond headquarters for a closed door meeting and a tour of Microsoft's "home of the future". The agreement reached is expected to strengthen Vietnam's IT industry, as well as provide software training for 50,000 of the country's teachers. Khai's visit also triggered protests in Seattle, reminding everyone of Vietnam's human rights record."
I'm not so much disagreeing (I agree with much of your argument), just picking up on your comments about Linux being used in places with poor human rights records: a central tenet of the GPL (and some other free software licenses) is that *no*restrictions* be placed on where the software is used. This sounds absurd, until you recall South Africa: I believe that there's still software kicking around that technically can't be used in South Africa "because of Apartheid".
Personally, I'd prefer it if $HUMAN_RIGHTS_VIOLATOR *now* can't use GPL-ed code, but I'm prepared to sacrifice that in order that $REFORMED_DEMOCRACY can use the same code *in*the*future*.
This is where the serious fun begins.
I just spent two weeks in Vietnam, and people look quite happy to me...and human rights do not seem to be violated anymore, especially not in shops selling bootleg MP3 and software CDs at 1$ apiece ! There even was very expensive engineering software like Patran. The good thing when you buy a Windows CD there (or DVD for 3$ ) is that when you install it, Office magically appears already configured in several languages with all extensions, as well as Photoshop or Acrobat, Norton and so on. So Microsoft is actually able to put on the market distributions competitive with Linux, usable out-of the box ! Very interesting also in Saigon-HMC : the museum of american war crimes in Vietnam (called now the Museum against war or something like that for political correctness). The very disturbing pictures of agent-orange children or torched villages help to relativize the alleged human rights violations...
Google passes Turing test : see my journal
The only people who believe that "could of" is logical or grammatically correct are those who have absorbed too much Hooked on Phonics and believe that words are always spelled as they are pronounced. These people then go on to spell common English words and phrases in their own accent, flattening and elongating letters and syllables as required until it "sounds right". Thus we get ridiculous words and phrases such as
- "could of" instead of "could have"
- "studdering" instead of "stuttering" and many other forms of swapping "t" for "d"
- People actually writing "y'awl"
- All sorts of other complete nonsense
I am constantly amazed that some people can take the greatest communications medium man has ever known and use to communicate so poorly that even other native speakers have difficulty understanding what a person is trying to say. When did it become O.K. to talk like a brain addled drug addict, mumbling and typo-ing your way through life? How about non-native English speakers, who have to expand more energy than should be required to decipher someone elses poorly spelled, poorly constructed sentences? They have been taught correct English and know how to the language correctly; they're at a distinct disadvantage when "the innernet" is infested with lazy, sloppy idiots who can't spell and don't care.>Personally, I'd prefer it if $HUMAN_RIGHTS_VIOLATOR *now* can't use GPL-ed code
s /2005/06/20/tech_firms_help_tyrants_keep_their_gri p/
Lets remind ourselves that $HUMAN_RIGHTS_VIOLATOR can use the loophole in (L)GPL that allows xSPs running GPL apps without abiding by the license (as they do not re-distribute the code).
Here are some workarounds for opressive governments worldwide:
a) have xSPs (Microsoft, Google, Yahoo et al) do the dirty work fo' ya (Microsoft a bit less likely to use GPL software for that, but still).
Motto: We're snitches so you don't have to be.
http://www.boston.com/business/technology/article
b) outsource IT operations to multinationals who will run GPL-ed code in any way necessary (including assisting in human rights violations) as long as it helps them make money.
I can wholeheartedly recommend IBM as they have related experience and references stretching as far back as World War II.
Yes, yes indeed. Makes you wonder how we hear so many tales of torture and abuse coming out of Gitmo. You'd think they'd all be dead or shut up in dungeons never to be heard from again.