Slashdot Mirror
Supreme Court Rules Private Property Can be Seized
slew writes "CNN is reporting that the U.S. Supreme Court issued a ruling in a case where a local community seized private houses for commercial development (not public works) under the guise of eminent domain. Needless to say, the little guy loses to the commercial developer this case...
"
All your homes are belong to us.
This signature intentionally left blank.
Now I can finally plow down my two neighbors houses and install my cluster!!!!
In Soviet America, private property seizes local government.
This is really a sad day.
What are you going to do?
Watch Jessica Simpson on MTV.
"The only clear view is from atop the mountain of our dead selves." - Peter Carroll
It is very difficult to overemphasize quite how evil this ruling is.
No no. It is easy to overemphasize how evil this is:
This ruling will result in the destruction of the sun and the solar system as we know it.
Thanks. I will be here all week.
Try to hack my 31337 firewall!
That was a cool-headed, nuanced and unbiased interpretation of a political story.
I think you must have the wrong website.
Tired of Political Trolls? Opt Out!
Actually, you won't be here all week. I've convinced the local government to take your house by eminent domain.
In this instance, I have to agree with Rhenquist, Scalia, Thomas, and O'Conner.
Now I need to go take a shower.
It's underline markup language. Your browser must not support HTML+ULML extensions. :p
Stylish Punishment:
1. Locate the mayor (or whoever decided that YOUR house was the one to go) and the local representatives of the business that will replace your property;
2. Hog-tie them and bring them to a quiet, abandoned farm outside town.
3. Show them the inflatible kiddie pool full of bull shit you've prepared for them.
4. Stick each one in the bull shit head first, with only their legs sticking out. Wait until the twitching stops, while taking commemorative pictures to show your grandchildren one day.
5. Go home and forget about the whole thing. Pretend to be surprised and delighted when the reporters ask you about it. Remember to smile! Look friendly!
Farewell! It's been a fine buncha years!
This runs so counter to the concept of using eminent domain for the public good that I could scream.
Actually, I DID scream. Never in my fucking life did I actually get so emotional about how fucked up our government is. Today, I let out a deep fucking scream to let it all out.
I call for a revolution...if it's not already in the process.
Life is not for the lazy.
William Buckley said he'd rather be governed by the first 200 people in the phone book than by the faculty of Harvard. I agree, although I don't know if I'd want to be governed by AAA Towing Company...
Stupidest thing I've ever read.
Second stupidest.
Now before I get modded down, I be to remind whoever might read this that what I am saying is FACT. - bogaboga
You need to read the 5th Amendment more closely. It says:
Since this was clearly a case of taking private property for private use, the 5th Amendment does not apply.
</tongue>
We don't see the world as it is, we see it as we are.
-- Anais Nin
Vinnie will be stopping buy to discuss this matter further. =)
Lost at C:>. Found at C.
The public deserves well designed land use. Well designed land use means decreasing sprawl and its related pollution, and putting office buildings, hotels, and other things that citizens use in places that make sense. So if there's a sprawling residential neighborhood sitting right in the middle of a growing urban area, the public deserves it to be replaced with something that makes sense for the people.
The SCOTUS just declared that the local governments in areas like I mentioned should have the right to make those kinds of decisions. It doesn't mean that Walmart can take any land it wants.
I salute this decision. It's one more step towards reducing sprawl!
my blog