Slashdot Mirror


Newly Formed Solar System

xPsi writes "An article in New Scientist reports that a team of astronomers from UC Berkeley and NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center have used the Hubble space telescope to image a dust ring in orbit around Fomalhaut, a nearby star about 25 light years away. The ring 'offers the best evidence yet that a nearby star is circled by a newly formed solar system.' Oddly enough, from the Earth's vantage point, the ring also happens to resemble The Eye of Sauron. One Ring to rule them all, one Ring to find them..."

26 of 117 comments (clear)

  1. Newly formed solar system my ass! by nokilli · · Score: 4, Funny

    Ours was invented first! We own the patent! You think inventing a solar system is easy? Trivial and non-obvious? Then why haven't you created one yourself?

    Prior art? I can't seeeeeeee you! Can you show that your solar system was invented before our solar system was?

    Yeah, I thought so.

    All your solar system are belong to us. Uh huh. Don't waste your time crying cause I can't hear the tears. All those heavenly bodies? Time for me to get jiggy with each and every one! I got my pulsar right here!

    My IP is bigger than your IP!

    (and to think Bozo patents the "click" and Jobs patents the "wheel". I mean, c'mon guys, keep up. I'm talking planets here! What do you got? A forest and a fruit? -1, I'm-Not-Interested-Anymore.)

  2. "Newly" formed? by TCM · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'd say it's at least 25 years old. Pfft.

    You need to speed up your R&D cycle to compete in today's market, Mr. astronomer guys.

    --
    Of course it runs NetBSD. BTC: 1NT7QvbetmANwaMzhpVL6
  3. That's quite a journey... by AtariEric · · Score: 4, Funny

    Good luck getting the ring to that Mount Doom...

    --
    Don't trust any concentration of power.
    1. Re:That's quite a journey... by MaDeR · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Incorrect. Any mission to Hubble is more costly than making and firing into sky a new shiny telescope. Why?

      Space is counter-intutive. We assume that repairing is normally cheaper than buying new thing. But escaping from Earth's gravity well is COSTLY. DAMN HUGE COSTLY. And you pay that cost in both cases (repair vs new). If repair mission hinders progress of development of new telescopes, then i say TO HELL with Hubble. New 'scopes have superior capabilities and in month can make more discoveries than Hubble in whole life. Enough to say.

      --
      What modern Obelix would say today? Of course, "Those crazy Americans!".
  4. I wonder if they have any telephone poles by Rei · · Score: 5, Funny

    I wonder if that would be a good spot to post my flyer:

    **Missing!**

    One solar sail. Shiny silver, 10 stories tall, 5 microns wide. Lost near the Sol area, but may be near Formalhaut in about 500 years. Answers to "401.525 MHz". Very dear to our hearts; reward offered.If sighted, please contact the Planetary Society at 626-793-5100.

    --
    What a crazy random happenstance!
    1. Re:I wonder if they have any telephone poles by ImaLamer · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I know you are going for humor, but why not leave now?

      It's only 25 light years away. If solar sails can be asumed to go "a significant fraction" of light speed (at their best) we can assume that it would take no longer than a few minutes - to the passengers (assuming that a trip of 100,000 light years would take about 3 minutes "to the riders").

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Light_year
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_dilation

      This means a two-way trip to "snap photos" would mean that your loved ones may have passed, but you are theorically only about 50-100 years into the future. TFA mentions the amount of learning that could be had - if we left in the next 100 years we would learn even more, but this solar system is still young. Even sending instruments to beam back data would be worth it.

      Sure, there are a lot of things to work out - but it is something to shoot for. And a whole lot more worth it than going for Mars or the Moon again.

    2. Re:I wonder if they have any telephone poles by Im+Rick+James+Bitch! · · Score: 3, Funny

      Damnit, now you know I'm gonna have to go out and post that flyer all over my city! BASTARD! :) I might even use this photo:

      http://www.universetoday.com/am/uploads/2004-1110s ail-full.jpg

      Want me to email you some pics of the flyer, as well as the various locations I post it? I'm gonna post it either way, so we both might as well enjoy it :)

    3. Re:I wonder if they have any telephone poles by Captain+Nitpick · · Score: 3, Interesting
      It's only 25 light years away. If solar sails can be asumed to go "a significant fraction" of light speed (at their best) we can assume that it would take no longer than a few minutes - to the passengers (assuming that a trip of 100,000 light years would take about 3 minutes "to the riders").

      You've forgotten about acceleration. Accelerating to 99.9% of light speed (relative to the Sun) in 90 seconds would require an acceleration of about 340,000g. Solar sails don't have that kind of thrust, and you couldn't build a ship or crew to survive it anyway.

      (Note that I've done the math using newtonian equations. With relativistic effects the number is bound to be much worse).

      --
      But then again, I could be wrong.
  5. soooo old! by cryptoz · · Score: 5, Funny

    Come on, even Slashdot is usually better at reporting news that's RECENT! I mean, how can you call something that formed 25 years ago _news_? Bah!

  6. Wow, Life Imitating...wait a minute!!! by Basehart · · Score: 4, Funny

    What if the Earth is some kind of Art Planet, and what we do here really is copied "out there", or at least observed and acted upon, in the same way as in Galaxy Quest.

    Lets face it, that sure does look like the Eye Of Sauron and it sure wasn't discovered before a couple of million beings on Planet Earth saw the movie and started dreaming about it or whatever.

    1. Re:Wow, Life Imitating...wait a minute!!! by Digital+Vomit · · Score: 2, Funny
      What if the Earth is some kind of Art Planet, and what we do here really is copied "out there"

      I'd say we'd have one hell of an IP lawsuit brewing!

      --
      Modern copyright is theft of culture from everyone and it retards the progress of the useful arts and sciences.
  7. Better the eye or Sauron... by EvilCabbage · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... than the brown eye of Goatse.

  8. Looks like the eye of Sauron? by Man+in+Spandex · · Score: 2, Funny

    IT'S A TRAP!

  9. So now we have by urbster1 · · Score: 5, Funny

    a LOTR solar system? What's next, the Star Wars solar system? Oh wait, my bad, that was a long, long time ago.

  10. Re:How Long? by helioquake · · Score: 3, Informative

    The discoverers knew the ring-like object was there beforehand. It was observed in infrared light first. What is unprecedented is the clarity of the feature in visual light and accurate knowledge of its geometry (the center of the ring (ellipse) isn't exactly coincident with the central star, which implies some other gravitating object is present).

    If the presence of a planetary system weren't suspected, I doubt they would have gotten orbits to use the HST to observe this.

    As for the "newly formed" stuff, it has nothing to do with the Hubble picture. It merely is a speculation based on the fact that the star is A-type star (like Vega) that hadn't evolved too much (I don't remember how old, but it's nowhere near as old as the Sun...) Anyway, add the word "astronomically" in front of "newly formed" to make a better sense out of the phrase.

  11. No pupil by ByteSlicer · · Score: 4, Informative

    Oddly enough, from the Earth's vantage point, the ring also happens to resemble The Eye of Sauron.

    Actually, the black pupil isn't really there, it's just the Hubble's coronagraph (see TFA). So, while the picture indeed resembles the Eye of Sauron, the system doesn't really look like this seen from Earth.

    1. Re:No pupil by helioquake · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually, the black pupil isn't really there

      Nor those spoke-like features radiating out of the black eye. These patterns are due to the opitical system of the HST/ACS instrument.

  12. Re:Wallpaper sized image? by helioquake · · Score: 4, Informative

    Go here:

    STScI Press Release

    Click on the top image, then scroll down to find unannotated version of images and click on it. Then you'll find a big TIFF file of this picture.

    Enjoy.

  13. My favorite ring-related heavenly body: by Humorously_Inept · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Hoag's Object. So unusual they call it an object!

    --

    ~Someday, I hope to be an aspiring author.
  14. only one of them, right? by adrianmonk · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Maybe I'm just being nitpicky, but I thought the Sun (proper noun) was a star (common noun), and that Sol (also proper noun) was another word for the Sun, and that therefore the Solar System (also proper noun) specifically refers to the Sun and the planets surrounding it, not to any other star systems.

    So, saying "Newly Formed Solar System" makes no sense, because there is only one Solar System, and we are in it right now, and it is not newly formed. It makes about as much sense to call something else a Solar System as it would if we discovered another continent and the headline were "New North America Found" instead of "New Continent Found".

    1. Re:only one of them, right? by FinestLittleSpace · · Score: 2, Informative

      When a planet orbits a star, that star is it's Sun. The Sun is not a singular entity.

  15. More like the eye of the Great Old Ones by Black+Art · · Score: 4, Funny

    Lovecraft claimed that some of the Great Old Ones lived on or near Fomalhaut. Maybe it is not the eye of Sauron, but something far worse.

    And now that we can see it, it can see us. And it will come for us in our dreams. And lick the sweet icor from our brains.

    Enya! Enya! Cthulhu fthagan!

    --
    "Trademarks are the heraldry of the new feudalism."
    1. Re:More like the eye of the Great Old Ones by Bambi+Dee · · Score: 2, Funny

      You're lucky you misspelled fthagn... oops.

  16. More Info by kf6auf · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This dust cloud was first published in 1989 in the Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society.

    According to "The Age of Gliese 879 and Fomalhaut" in APJ v.475, p.313 (1997) Fomalhaut is 200 +/- 100 million years old. While this is a large margin of error, this still confirms that circumstellar dust disks can persist in A stars for several hundred megayears, which it is believed can then form planets.

    According to Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society v.334, p.589 (2002) it is estimated that the ring has the mass of 20-30 Earths.

    While not known for certain "Submillimeter Observations of an Asymmetric Dust Disk around Fomalhaut" in APJ v.582, p.1141-46 (2003) implies that the ring offset and the clump with 5% the mass of the ring is likely caused by a large planet close to the star, but I don't know what this no-visible-planet observation means for that theory. Dark matter?

    And I could not for the life of me find the distance that ring is from Fomalhaut. Anyone know?

    And thanks for that link to the Eye of Sauron, I had been wondering what that was.

  17. Yeah, okay... by Zarf · · Score: 2, Funny

    Oddly enough, from the Earth's vantage point, the ring also happens to resemble The Eye of Sauron. One Ring to rule them all, one Ring to find them...

    Zonk, to you everything looks like "The Eye of Sauron" ... a latte with that swirly cream, a sundae with a cherry on top, a toilet seat, anything vaugely circular ...

    It's called Post-Traumatic-Stress-Disorder and you need to get help before you get on that white ship with Gandalf.

    --
    [signature]
  18. actually.... by goldberry · · Score: 2, Insightful

    According to Wikipedia "A star system or stellar system is a group of stars (and possibly smaller bodies such as planets or asteroids) that orbit one another (systems with planetary bodies orbiting stars, are referred to as solar systems or planetary systems)." So really, if we want to get technical, "planetary system" would be the most appropriate. Not that it matters.

    --
    But one day Tom, he went and caught the River-daughter, in green gown, flowing hair, sitting in the rushes