Programming Linux on Cell
Nora writes "developerWorks has posted a
slightly
expanded version of
the paper presented at LinuxTag today by
IBM's Linux-for-Cell maintainer
Arnd Bergmann (which was
mentioned
on Slashdot a few weeks ago).
I searched the LinuxTag site to post a link to their copy of the paper
also, but I couldn't find one (but my German is not so good, so it's
probably my fault). In addition to the abovementioned paper on the SPU file system, we have
also published an interview
with
Arnd Bergmann in which we learn more about programming for Linux on
Cell, and programming for
Cell
in general -- and also that there is no such thing as the so-called 'Cell
Workstation' that some of us have been looking
forward to for a long time (apparently, it's just the Blade board
prototype that many of us have already seen). And of course,
much more. "
Now my cellphone will never crash again!
Anyone know if the DragonFlyBSD people are considering going anywhere with this? It seems right up their alley.
There are many arguments why, but the main is that hardware development is expensive and essentially serial. Software development can be parallelized (as Open Source has done) but this does not apply to processors. Chip fabbing doesn't scale. It makes economic sense to have a single dominant computer architecture, manufactured globally and powering everything from a PC to a gaming console to a cellphone.
The Cell processor is a dead end, just like the overpriced PPC OpenWorkstation products and the overrated Alpha line.
Bottom line: At modern clockspeeds architecture is irrelevant.
Programming Linux on Cell ... in a cubicle ... using chroot jail, no less. Is that the future of IT jobs?
Karma: Positive (probably because of superiour intellect)
German page with pictures of the Cell-Board
...a stunned silence fell upon the hall.
That "Bottom line: " is Amsterdam Vallon shit baby.
At least give me credit, Jew.
"We have a special GCC port"
GCC is GPL, of course. Where's the Cell GCC port for download?
--
make install -not war
It's hardly your fault not finding some paper on a german only website of a german only expo + conference, even though they claim to be "World's no . 1 Linux Expo and Conference since 1996".
Which ironically enough is about the only english phrase to be found on that website.
I know I might just be ranting, but this is not only the problem with the website, but is in fact typically for the event itself as well.
I honestly can't see why any linux conference where 75+% of all talks are in German can claim to be an international conference.
PS: I am a non-native english speaker. I understand German very well, but my idea of an international conference is not that of the LinuxTag organisers...
-- The day Microsoft makes things that don't suck, it's the day they start making vacuum cleaners.