AMD Files Antitrust Lawsuit Against Intel

jonathan_ingram writes "As reported on GrokLaw, AMD has just filed an antitrust lawsuit against Intel. AMD states in its press release that the complaint details "... how Intel has unlawfully maintained its monopoly in the x86 microprocessor market by engaging in worldwide coercion of customers from dealing with AMD. It identifies 38 companies that have been victims of coercion by Intel - including large scale computer-makers, small system-builders, wholesale distributors, and retailers, through seven types of illegality across three continents.""

Comments

Interesting

[farker haiku]

When AMD succeeded in getting on the HP retail roadmap for mobile computers, and its products sold well, Intel responded by withholding HP's fourth quarter 2004 rebate check and refusing to waive HP's failure to achieve its targeted rebate goal; it allowed HP to make up the shortfall in succeeding quarters by promising Intel at least 90% of HP's mainstream retail business.

*Threatening retaliation against customers for introducing AMD computer platforms, particularly in strategic market segments such as commercial desktop;

*Then-Compaq CEO Michael Capellas said in 2000 that because of the volume of business given to AMD, Intel withheld delivery of critical server chips. Saying "he had a gun to his head," he told AMD he had to stop buying.


That sounds pretty damning.

Read the document

[rwven]

It's amazing how much dirt AMD has on intel if you read their suit document. I think it's safe to say that the only way intel will win this one is if they pay off the judge...which given their history they just might try... ;-P This has been a long time coming and it's definatley about dang time...

Re:No more business from AMD

[krgallagher]

" Intel doesn't have a monopoly, at least with PC chips. AMD is simply using this as a business tactic."

Here is a list of specific allegations:

• Forcing major customers such as Dell, Sony, Toshiba, Gateway, and Hitachi into Intel-exclusive deals in return for outright cash payments, discriminatory pricing or marketing subsidies conditioned on the exclusion of AMD;
• According to industry reports, and as confirmed by the JFTC in Japan, Intel has paid Dell and Toshiba huge sums not to do business with AMD.
• Intel paid Sony millions for exclusivity. AMD's share of Sony's business went from 23 percent in '02 to 8% in '03, to 0%, where it remains today.

• Forcing other major customers such as NEC, Acer, and Fujitsu into partial exclusivity agreements by conditioning rebates, allowances and market development funds (MDF) on customers' agreement to severely limit or forego entirely purchases from AMD;
• Intel paid NEC several million dollars for caps on NEC's purchases from AMD. Those caps assured Intel at least 90% of NEC's business in Japan and imposed a worldwide cap on the amount of AMD business NEC could do.

• Establishing a system of discriminatory and retroactive incentives triggered by purchases at such high levels as to have the intended effect of denying customers the freedom to purchase any significant volume of processors from AMD;
• When AMD succeeded in getting on the HP retail roadmap for mobile computers, and its products sold well, Intel responded by withholding HP's fourth quarter 2004 rebate check and refusing to waive HP's failure to achieve its targeted rebate goal; it allowed HP to make up the shortfall in succeeding quarters by promising Intel at least 90% of HP's mainstream retail business.

• Threatening retaliation against customers for introducing AMD computer platforms, particularly in strategic market segments such as commercial desktop;
• Then-Compaq CEO Michael Capellas said in 2000 that because of the volume of business given to AMD, Intel withheld delivery of critical server chips. Saying "he had a gun to his head," he told AMD he had to stop buying.
• According to Gateway executives, their company has paid a high price for even its limited AMD dealings. They claim that Intel has "beaten them into 'guacamole'" in retaliation.

• Establishing and enforcing quotas among key retailers such as Best Buy and Circuit City, effectively requiring them to stock overwhelmingly or exclusively, Intel computers, artificially limiting consumer choice;
• AMD has been entirely shut out from Media Markt, Europe's largest computer retailer, which accounts for 35 percent of Germany's retail sales.
• Office Depot declined to stock AMD-powered notebooks regardless of the amount of financial support AMD offered, citing the risk of retaliation.

• Forcing PC makers and tech partners to boycott AMD product launches or promotions;
• Then-Intel CEO Craig Barrett threatened Acer's Chairman with "severe consequences" for supporting the AMD Athlon 64(TM) launch. This coincided with an unexplained delay by Intel in providing $15-20M in market development funds owed to Acer. Acer withdrew from the launch in September 2003.

• Abusing its market power by forcing on the industry technical standards and products that have as their main purpose the handicapping of AMD in the marketplace.
• Intel denied AMD access to the highest level of membership for the Advanced DRAM technology consortium to limit AMD's participation in critical industry standard decisions that would affect its business.
• Intel designed its compilers, which translate software programs into machine-readable language, to degrade a program's performance if operated on a computer powered by an AMD microprocessor.

Same complaint, different year

[Anonymous Coward]

http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/technolog y/2003-09-16-intel_x.htm

AMD made most of the same charges in 2001 and the FTC dropped it in 2003.

Re:It's funny

[Cleveland Steamer]

Which part of your ass did you pull those numbers from?

According to IDC, AMD has only 10% of the CPU market.

http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=19972

Re:Only a good thing for Apple (and all vendors)

[IAmTheDave]

Actually, most of their bragging rights sit with the Pentium M, built on the PIII architecture. Toms has a great article about it. It beats the Athlon 64 FX and the PIV Extreme Edition. That ain't shabby.

Re:About time...

[RailGunner]

That's not all, sadly. Even though the Opteron, for example, supports the SSE2 instruction set (and supports it faster than a Pentium 4 Xeon based on my benchmarks) when you call in to any function in the Intel Integrated Performance Primitives (IPP), it will "watershed" to the default pentium, non-optimized code. It will NOT run the SSE2, SSE, or even MMX enabled functions. So this is another example of Intel screwing over AMD.

Re: This will be a long and difficult case to prov

[Otter]

But there's a big gap between us all 'knowing' that Intel is engaging in arm-twisting and proving it beyond reasonable doubt in a court of law.

First, this is a civil suit -- there is no need for proof beyond reasonable doubt.

That said, the fact that the legal system requires a level of evidence above that required for Slashbots to "know" something is a good thing.

Re:Patent insanity

[TheRaven64]

I think you are misinformed. Intel did patent the 8088 design. They were required by IBM to license it to a second source. AMD were founded, basically, to be this second source. Later on, AMD designs were clean-room implementations based solely on the published instruction set, not on the Intel designs.

Re:Only a good thing for Apple (and all vendors)

[frankie]

Remember, Pentium M was far and away Apple's primary consideration. Even with the failure to hit 3GHz, the G5 is still a good CPU. However, Mac laptops have been stuck with the same old crappy-bus G4s for a long Long LONG time, and they're the majority of Apple's sales.

Re:Only a good thing for Apple (and all vendors)

[Grave]

I'm sorry, but you are comparing an overclocked processor to a standard processor. If you compare them at available warranty-covered speeds, then the Pentium M falls way behind. While it is a very impressive chip for what it does, it is not available at 2.5GHz.

Pentium M and overclocking

[Lonewolf666]

The article at Tom's compares an overclocked Pentium M to Athlon 64 FX and the PIV Extreme Edition running at standard clock speed. Tom's also uses an Athlon 64 FX with the now-obsolete Clawhammer chip in 130nm, which makes AMD look bad in the power dissipation test.

In other news, LostCircuits has successfully overclocked a Venice core-based Athlon64-3800+ :
http://www.lostcircuits.com/cpu/amd_venice/

These results look impressive too, and I don't think AMD is beaten yet.

Re:About time...

[man_of_mr_e]

According to their stock charts, they are:

http://finance.yahoo.com/q/ks?s=AMD

They made 1.97 Billion in gross profit last year. with a net income of 28.64 Million. Their last quarter doesn't look too good, but most companies have strong and weak quarters in a year.