Slashdot Mirror


Hackers, Spelling, and Grammar?

Strom Carlson asks: "Over the last few years, I've noticed that a surprisingly large number of native English speakers, who are otherwise very technically competent, seem to lack strong English skills. Mostly, this seems to manifest itself as varying degrees of poor spelling and grammar: 'definately' instead of 'definitely'; 'should of' instead of 'should have'; and I even see the names of products and companies misspelled from time to time. It baffles me that a culture so obsessed with technical knowledge and accuracy can demonstrate such little attention to detail when it comes to communicating that knowledge with others, and it baffles me even more that many people become enraged when you attempt to help them correct and learn from their mistakes. Do hackers and geeks just not care about communicating effectively? Do they not realize that a mediocre command of written English makes them appear less intelligent? Am I missing something here?"

7 of 2,360 comments (clear)

  1. "Am I missing something here?" by Saxton · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Am I missing something here?

    Yes you are. Defiantly.

    -Aaron

    --
    My name is Aaron Landry, and I approve this message.
  2. Grammer rooles! by ac3boy · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I four won wood lick too post my outtrage on thiss matter.

    I definately doo nott unnderstand why thiss wood make it heart four peeple to geet my point. I gess i shoud have listned butter inn skool.

  3. Re:I second that by rbarreira · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Where I come from, we usually end sentences with a period... Please be attentive.

    --

    The AACS key is NOT 0xF606EEFD628B1CA427BEA93A9CA9773F
  4. Oh come on by Eslyjah · · Score: 1, Redundant

    That's rediculous!

  5. Old news; here's the proof by Black+Perl · · Score: 0, Redundant


    A Plan for the Improvement of English
    Spelling

    by Mark Twain

    For example, in Year 1 that useless letter "c" would
    be dropped to be replased either by "k" or "s", and
    likewise "x" would no longer be part of the
    alphabet. The only kase in which "c" would be
    retained would be the "ch" formation, which will be
    dealt with later. Year 2 might reform "w" spelling,
    so that "which" and "one" would take the same
    konsonant, wile Year 3 might well abolish "y"
    replasing it with "i" and Iear 4 might fiks the "g/j"
    anomali wonse and for all.

    Jenerally, then, the improvement would kontinue
    iear bai iear with Iear 5 doing awai with useless
    double konsonants, and Iears 6-12 or so
    modifaiing vowlz and the rimeining voist and
    unvoist konsonants. Bai Iear 15 or sou, it wud
    fainali bi posibl tu meik ius ov thi ridandant letez
    "c", "y" and "x" -- bai now jast a memori in the
    maindz ov ould doderez -- tu riplais "ch", "sh", and
    "th" rispektivli.

    Fainali, xen, aafte sam 20 iers ov orxogrefkl riform,
    wi wud hev a lojikl, kohirnt speling in ius xrewawt xe
    Ingliy-spiking werld.

    --
    bp
  6. Re:Wow! What a question to ask on Slashdot... by crabpeople · · Score: 0, Redundant

    tru dat


    --
    I'll just use my special getting high powers one more time...
  7. Re:Wow! What a question to ask on Slashdot... by bensafrickingenius · · Score: 0, Redundant

    The European Commission has just announced an agreement whereby English will be the official language of the EU rather than German which was the other possibility. As part of the negotiations, Her Majesty's Government conceded that English spelling had some room for improvement and has accepted a 5 year phase-in plan that would be known as "Euro-English". In the first year, "s" will replace the soft "c". Sertainly, this will make the sivil servants jump with joy. The hard "c" will be dropped in favour of the"k". This should klear up konfusion and keyboards kan have 1 less letter. There will be growing publik enthusiasm in the sekond year, when the troublesome "ph" will be replaced with "f". This will make words like "fotograf" 20% shorter. In the 3rd year, publik akseptanse of the new spelling kan be ekspekted to reach the stage where more komplikated changes are possible. Governments will enkorage the removal of double letters, which have always ben a deterent to akurate speling. Also, al wil agre that the horible mes of the silent "e"s in the language is disgraseful, and they should go away. By the fourth year, peopl wil be reseptiv to steps such as replasing "th" with "z" and "w" with "v". During ze fifz year, ze unesesary "o" kan be dropd from vords kontaining "ou" and similar changes vud of kors be aplid to ozer kombinations of leters. After zis fifz yer, ve vil hav a reli sensibl riten styl. Zer vil be no mor trubl or difikultis and evrivun vil find it ezi to understand ech ozer. Ze drem vil finali kum tru! And zen ve vil tak over ze world!

    --
    I am not left-handed, either!