Slashdot Mirror


We Don't Need the GPL Anymore

jpkunst writes "In a lengthy interview with Eric S. Raymond by Federico Biancuzzi at O'Reilly's onlamp.com, ESR defends his position that 'Open source would be succeeding faster if the GPL didn't make lots of people nervous about adopting it.'" From the article: "I don't think the GPL is the principal reason for Linux's success. Rather, I believe it's because in 1991 Linus was the first person to find the right social architecture for distributed software development. It wasn't possible much before then because it required cheap internet; and after Linux, most people who might otherwise have founded OS projects found that the minimum-energy route to what they wanted was to improve Linux. The GPL helped, but I think mainly as a sort of social signal rather than as a legal document with teeth."

1 of 919 comments (clear)

  1. Stallman by wheelbarrow · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Does Stallman think it's ok that some consumers make a free and voluntary choice to pay for commercially licensed software? Or, does he want that freedom of choice taken away because his model is better for mankind?