BBC to Cull the Cult TV Repository
malkavian writes "The BBC has announced that it's going to be ceasing to host it's Cult TV Repository. At a meager 700,000 users per month, it was decided that this was no longer a significantly useful public resource, as the information was also available elsewhere on the net. Many people believe this to be a grievous mistake on the part of the BBC, to allow the history of their own broadcasting highlights to fragment, and possibly be lost like so much of its other content."
It's not like they lack bandwith ? Maybe they lack the human workforce to keep it up... If they'd open it up a little like a wiki this wouldn't be much of a problem, and bandwith cost is largely covered by the affluence to other BCC pages.
\u262D = \u5350
this is like the black & white film I think where everyone bemoaned that it was no longer available but few people who complained ever use it any more. so like it's the same with many tv shows when many people say "well that one should stay on air!!!" but they dont watch it even when it is on.
This is about pressure on the what web content the BBC should have from other commericial operators such as News International (The Sun newspaper, Sky TV) and other Newspapers groups who feel that the BBC is giving away content, they could be earning revenue from.
Don.
Slashdot - The Home of the Tortured Analogy
No, no, no, no, NO!
As someone who is not in the UK, I can tell you that (for me anyway) I would be happy to pay for a subscription to the BBC (both for television and web, but not BBC America since it's watered/dumbed down). I think that modifying your statement to say "Perhaps the BBC should implement a subscription model for those outside the UK and the non-lincense fee payers" would be a bit more appealing to me. I would gladly pay for quality programming from them, since most of the programming in the US is crap.
"Teleporting Rodents with D-Cell Battery Displacement" theory -- IgnoramusMaximus (692000)
Isn't the whole point of cult TV that its not mainstream 'masses' but a smaller number of dedicated fans? And while we are at it, the internet is not a broadcast medium, unlike TV/radio where a transmitter costs a fixed amount no matter how many people tune in, a website costs less to run with fewer visitors, sure it gets to a point where the overhead outweighs the variable cost but 700,000 people? The BBC should just start a BitTorrent tracker or something similar if the costs are too high for a full video server.
Anyway the BBC is supposed to be pushing the masses up not dumbing down. A commercial network might bow to the biggest demographic but the point of a socialist/communist/whatever corporation is that it gives the masses good intelligent programming whether they like it or not, both types are needed - commercial TV is more 'fair' in its finances, non-commercial tax-funded TV is more 'fair' in its representation of all demographics. I call on the BBC to go back to educating people so they will realise how valuable a service it is and continue to make sure its funded.
This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
I didn't know about this site until it came up in this slashdot topic. Perhaps they should have linked to other sites like TV Cream which has all the theme tunes and info on British TV programming. Although, as other comments have stated, there's no point in the BBC maintaining a web site dedicated to TV programming from the USA.
Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
Oh... Well, in that case..it looks like I'm the smeghead.
"I drank WHAT?!"--Socrates
If not, then I would be contributing to the maintenance and upkeep of a 101 sites of which are of little interest to anyone.
The BBC serves the public licence-paying viewers interests and if they are not interested in something, then it should not be wasting its money on such a project.
Without trying to sound completely negative, I hope that the BBC will be sensible enough to allow someone else to host the content and continue to maintain it.
Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
What the BBC should not be doing is spending money on broadcasting sports, soap operas, by-the-numbers drama, blockbuster films and yet more tedious reality TV. These are already provided by the multitude of commercial channels available. Any reduction in spending on these areas is a step in the right direction. Sadly I think the Beeb will end up doing the opposite and mainly trimming the minority programming it should be specialising on, and pumping all its cash in to more Test The Nation Moron Specials and Yet Another Working Class Soap.
BBC programming is still head and shoulders above the rest, although ITV is catching up in places.
I thought that Strictly Come Dancing and Strictly Dance Fever were far superior reality TV offerings to the likes of How Clean Is Your Toilet, Big Brother, Celebrity Love Island and the rest.
How many people can read hex if only you and dead people can read hex?