Slashdot Mirror


Tempel 1 Impact Day After Tomorrow

TerminaMorte wrote to mention a news.com article detailing the impending contact of the "Deep Impact" satellite with the Tempel 1 comet...at roughly 23,000 miles per hour. from the article: "We know that the crust--the outside shell of a comet and the stuff that comes off a comet--is changed by the solar wind...One of the things that we're curious about is, some people will tell you that comets actually produce organic compounds...We want to see if that's inside." Update: 07/02 22:08 GMT by Z : Updated with correct day.

95 comments

  1. Cautious optimism... by cookiej · · Score: 4, Funny

    Well, since this seems to be one of the first times we've gone out of our way to really put the wood to something not from Earth, let's hope Tempel 1 isn't some sort of cometary offspring whose mother will take offense and pulverize us.

    Just a thought.

    1. Re:Cautious optimism... by toddbu · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm really excited about this. If you think about it, this is the first time in human history where we can really witness the interaction of a man-made object on a body in outer space. It would be kind of like looking at the Moon and being able to see the lunar landers sitting on the surface. That is, if you believe that we really went to the Moon. :-)

      --
      If you don't want crime to pay, let the government run it.
    2. Re:Cautious optimism... by eclectro · · Score: 1

      let's hope Tempel 1 isn't some sort of cometary offspring

      Silly, it has a crust. Which means there's a caramel nougat center.

      --
      Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
    3. Re:Cautious optimism... by helioquake · · Score: 1

      You know that we sort of did this with Lunar Prospector...the HST watched the collision, but didn't see diddly-squat (I saw the data, too).

      Ok, strictly speaking the Moon may originate from Earth, so that may not count.

    4. Re:Cautious optimism... by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1
      You know that we sort of did this with Lunar Prospector...the HST watched the collision, but didn't see diddly-squat (I saw the data, too).

      But this was an impact with rock at 2km/s. HST was watching in case Prospector hit ice and created a cloud of vapour.

    5. Re:Cautious optimism... by Adrilla · · Score: 1

      Are any observatories or astrological groups recording and webcasting this? Is that even possible? I'd like to watch.

      --

      "Plans are for fools! Oglethorpe, the plutonian (Aqua Teen Hunger Force)
    6. Re:Cautious optimism... by helioquake · · Score: 1

      No,no, you've got the signal wrong. My response was to a part of the parent's submission: "put the wood onto..." Not really thinking about comparison between DI mission vs. Lunar Prospector.

      That'd be like comparing an apple and an orange.

      [The HST and Chandra are scheduled to monitor this event. Wait & see what will take place then.]

    7. Re:Cautious optimism... by KinkifyTheNation · · Score: 1

      NASA had provided coverage through space.com when the Mars Rovers landed, not sure whether or not they will be doing it for this event.

    8. Re:Cautious optimism... by Mr.+Bad+Example · · Score: 2, Funny

      > Well, since this seems to be one of the first times we've gone out of our way to really put the wood to something not from Earth

      That's only if you don't count all the times Captain Kirk nailed a green chick.

  2. Heavens Gate part II? by bigwavejas · · Score: 5, Funny
    "...some people will tell you that comets actually produce organic compounds...We want to see if that's inside."

    Hell yeah it's going to produce organic compounds! 10 bucks says the Heavens Gate Gang is riding shotgun in that badboy.

    http://www.cnn.com/US/9803/25/heavens.gate/

    --
    "Simplify, simplify, simplify!" Thoreau
    1. Re:Heavens Gate part II? by Seumas · · Score: 1

      Marshall Applewhite? Is that you?

    2. Re:Heavens Gate part II? by Kelerain · · Score: 1

      I went to your link and got the following error: 502 Bad Gateway Coincidence?

    3. Re:Heavens Gate part II? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe someone should keep a close watch on Tom Cruise and his girlfriendoid?

  3. My prediction by 2.7182 · · Score: 3, Funny

    It starts the first intergalactic war.

    1. Re:My prediction by Shin+Chan · · Score: 1

      No, no.. The First Galactic Empire! .. Silly.

      --
      Proud owner of BOT2K3 [ bot2k3.net ]
    2. Re:My prediction by Winkhorst · · Score: 2, Funny

      "It starts the first intergalactic war." Oh, is it from another galaxy?

      --
      "Is this Winkhorst a nova criminal?" "No just a technical sergeant wanted for interrogation."
  4. Given the current state of technology by vlad_petric · · Score: 1

    ... as long as "they" can steer a small asteroid to Earth (1km in diameter), it's total loss for us.

    --

    The Raven

    1. Re:Given the current state of technology by Leontes · · Score: 1

      Necessity is the mother of invention.

    2. Re:Given the current state of technology by big+tex · · Score: 1

      No doubt.
      I mean, we've still got Bruce Willis, the current energy policy is keeping the drilling industry in top shape, and NASA's working on a fancy new shuttle.

      We're golden.

      --
      I think I need a new sig here.
  5. Germs by Alex+P+Keaton+in+da · · Score: 3, Funny

    I really hope that they decontaminate this before it ever comes back... Viruses are some of the simplest life forms, so it is more likely that there would be a virus than a humanoid alien... Who knows what havoc this could wreak.
    In all seriousness, hopefully this will give us a window into the creation of the universe, or maybe just the solar system.
    I have sort of an obsession with astronomy... I think my parents always thought my telescope was for peeping on the neighbor- "honest mom, the vaseline is for greasing the telescope....

    --
    And All I Ask is a Tall Ship And a Star to Steer Her By
    1. Re:Germs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Germs??? Comes back???

      Please, if you're going to make stupid comments about it at least take the 5 minutes to read about the mission first. The impactor will be destroyed, and the flyby craft isn't coming back.

    2. Re:Germs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " really hope that they decontaminate this before it ever comes back"

      Who decontaminate what? It isn't a sample return as far as I know.

    3. Re:Germs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've heard of "spanking the monkey", but never "greasing the telescope".

    4. Re:Germs by Berner · · Score: 1

      Nope, not a problem. Even if the craft was coming back (which it is not) life on Earth has had billions of years of adapting to the conditions on this planet. Any alien bug that fell on the Earth would probably not do very well and promptly get eaten by some predatory amoeba.

      And in adition to that, they are not talking about any such thing as a living germ or anything that complex, what they HOPE to find are the building blocks of life, amino-acids and such.

    5. Re:Germs by rbarreira · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but then the amoeba would mutate into a dangerous being...

      --

      The AACS key is NOT 0xF606EEFD628B1CA427BEA93A9CA9773F
  6. Space.com by jazzman251 · · Score: 5, Informative
  7. So will I be able to see this in the north east? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And if so, what time should I look in the sky, and in which direction?

  8. Re:News at 11: Aliens Pissed. France Surrenders by erick99 · · Score: 1

    I am french and I will own up to the arrogant part but the rest, well, really now.....

    --
    http://www.busyweather.com/
  9. Not tomorrow, but the day after by MoobY · · Score: 3, Informative

    In fact, Tempel 1 will impact on July 4th at 05:52 UTC

    --
    --- Sigmentation Fault - Comments Dumped
    1. Re:Not tomorrow, but the day after by Shag · · Score: 5, Funny
      So you're saying Deep Impact happens on The Day After Tomorrow which is Independence Day?

      This seems scripted...

      --
      Village idiot in some extremely smart villages.
    2. Re:Not tomorrow, but the day after by rabugento · · Score: 1

      According to NASA NASA's Deep Impact spacecraft continues to sail through its final checkout, as it hurtles toward comet Tempel 1. Impact with the comet is scheduled for 1:52 a.m. EDT, July 4 (10:52 p.m. PDT, July 3).

      Therefore you can choose your date...

    3. Re:Not tomorrow, but the day after by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Absolutely hilarious! Shut down the thread, you wont get funnier than this.

    4. Re:Not tomorrow, but the day after by kronstadt · · Score: 1

      Yes, the White Chicks at NASA always plan things out like this.

    5. Re:Not tomorrow, but the day after by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Funny

      And if the comet people get mad, followed by The Tempel of Doom.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  10. You humans are so arrogant! by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 1

    A minor interplanetary conflict and you call it "intergalactic war". We could exterminate you all in a microsecond and it would be no more significant than a photon escaping from a star.

    --
    Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
    1. Re:You humans are so arrogant! by tritesnikov · · Score: 1

      Protons can't escape from stars, silly. All the tons of gravity would get in the way.

      --
      "God is dead." - Nietzsche

      "Nietzsche is dead." - God
    2. Re:You humans are so arrogant! by JuliusRV · · Score: 3, Informative

      Protons can't escape from stars, silly. All the tons of gravity would get in the way.

      He wrote "photons". And even protons escape stars. Did you ever hear of solar wind?

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_wind

    3. Re:You humans are so arrogant! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Yes. Solar wind is caused by eating solar Mexican food.

    4. Re:You humans are so arrogant! by tritesnikov · · Score: 1

      Well, I mistyped proton for photon, and yes, I do know that protons can escape from stars. I was making a joke and thought that the "tons of gravity" phrase would give it away. Obviously, "tons of gravity" doesn't make any sense as a phrase. Gravity has no weight in that sense as weight is the effect of gravity on an object with mass. And yes, I have heard of solar wind.

      --
      "God is dead." - Nietzsche

      "Nietzsche is dead." - God
    5. Re:You humans are so arrogant! by Koiu+Lpoi · · Score: 1

      Yup.

      Calvin: Why does it go from east to west?
      Dad: Solar wind

      Couldn't find a copy of the original strip...

    6. Re:You humans are so arrogant! by PakProtector · · Score: 1

      Take your best shot. I've been waiting out here in the Cometary Halo for two centuries waiting for someone to start something.

      So the question you need to ask yourself is..

      Do you feel lucky, Punk?

      Signed,
      Brennan-monster

      --

      Edward@Tomato - /home/Edward/ man woman
      man: no entry for woman in the manual.
      "Qua!?"

    7. Re:You humans are so arrogant! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Once, I ate a burrito while sitting in the sun.

      Afterward, I broke solar wind.

  11. Pic by Alsee · · Score: 1

    comets actually produce organic compounds...We want to see if that's inside

    Scientists discover: It's gigantic and filled with semi-organic compounds!

    -

    --
    - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  12. 2001 by writermike · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "My God. It's full of stars."

    --
    If Nalgene water bottles are outlawed, only outlaws will have Nalgene water bottles.
  13. Bets anyone? by LouisZepher · · Score: 5, Funny

    Given the failed Mars projects, who wants to place bets that this plan to intentionally crash the probe will result in a safe "three-point" landing?

  14. P.S. by Alsee · · Score: 1

    P.S.
    No that's not a link to the Goatse pic.

    -

    --
    - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  15. Re:So will I be able to see this in the north east by Shag · · Score: 5, Informative
    The impact? No.

    But if you wanted to try to see it pre-impact, you'd look (with a telescope or binoculars - it shouldn't be naked-eye) near Spica in the constellation Virgo; the comet will be near it, in the direction of Arcturus in the constellation Bootes.

    If you have no idea where Spica and Arcturus are... find the Big Dipper. Follow the curve of its handle, and look across the sky a ways for a bright kinda yellowish star. That's Arcturus. Then look about that far again for a bright bluish star. That's Spica.

    Or, get yourself on a flight to Maui ASAP and head over to Maui Community College, where a bunch of us will be doing a public outreach program featuring things like NASA people, live video links to observatories on Mauna Kea and Haleakala, and so on and so forth. And freebies. :)

    I've only been involved with DI-related stuff for 10 months (as a telescope operator, and now for outreach) but some folks I work with have been on this for the better part of 10 years, so I hope everything goes well!

    --
    Village idiot in some extremely smart villages.
  16. Sounds familiar... by MalusCaelestis · · Score: 4, Funny
    One of the things that we're curious about is, some people will tell you that comets actually produce organic compounds...We want to see if that's inside.
    So this is, what, the most expensive episode of MythBusters ever?
    1. Re:Sounds familiar... by NathanBFH · · Score: 1

      Well, the mods may not agree but _I_ thought that was hilarious. :oD

  17. It's NASA by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 4, Funny

    >> roughly 23,000 miles per hour

    It's NASA we're talking about here folks. The smart money says they ruin the experiment by only smashing into the comet at 23,000 kilometers an hour.

    1. Re:It's NASA by MyLongNickName · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Metric hours or imperial hours?

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
  18. TOMORROW for people with a chance to view it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And in other news, Americans are wrong because the U.S. independence day fireworks are happening on July 5th, UTC.

  19. TripMasterMonkey Tribute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny


    Good day, gentlemen. As you are no doubt aware, I have perfected a device capable of altering the orbital path of comets. First of all, I must offer kudos on a most inspired cover story...'scientific experiment' indeed...really, a first rate piece of propagan-da. Of course, you know it cannot last...

    You see, gentlemen, things will only get worse...my device, which I've dubbed 'the Cometrix', will continue destablizing our solar systems' comets' orbits, drawing them ever closer to our fragile planet. First, our natural satellite will get hit, affecting coastal regions with high tidal waves... then it will be our planet's turn, with explosions occurring on a global scale. No place on the planet will be safe...civilization as you know it will cease to exist...that is... unless you pay me...

    One hundred billion kajillion fafillion dollaaars!!!

    <DramaticMusic>

    Gentlemen, you have my demands...peace out.

  20. Been done before by localroger · · Score: 4, Informative

    The Apollo moon missions were observed telescopically by both amateur and professional astronomers. A terrestrial observatory even provided critical tracking information for Apollo 13's final course correction.

    --
    Brackets contain world's first nanosig, highly magnified:[.]
    1. Re:Been done before by wwest4 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but there was no possible optical imagery of the LEM landings. The idea that we're going to smash a (much more remote) non-terrestrial object and possibly see some results with our own eyes is pretty damned exciting from a pure entertainment perspective. It's popcorn astronomy at its finest yet!

  21. Redneck Scientists by Eclypser · · Score: 5, Funny

    Government scientists say the price tag is worth it. "One, we'll learn about comets," said NASA's Wessen. "Two, we'll learn about how that applies to the Earth, whether it brought organic material to the Earth...We can even learn, if a comet was coming our way, what it would take to deflect one of those things."
    "Three, we get to blow sh*t up, YEEE HAAAAA"

    --
    The comment has already been made. Let's move it along people. Nothing to see here.
  22. It takes a lick'in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "One of the things that we're curious about is, some people will tell you that comets actually produce organic compounds...We want to see if that's inside.""

    Tootsie Pop Comet.

  23. Ecologists! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    it's legal to do this?
    it's like throw a bomb over a national park to see if there are some fossils!
    where is Green Peace?!

    1. Re:Ecologists! by Mr.+Foogle · · Score: 1

      I know - don't feed the Trolls.

      But to answer your questions

      1) Yes.

      2) No, it's not. It's not a national park, it's a bit of trash flying around the Solar System.

      3) Green Peace? Lord God spare us.

      --
      Display some adaptability.
  24. Not really 23,000 miles an hour by onion2k · · Score: 0, Troll

    contact of the "Deep Impact" satellite with the Tempel 1 comet...at roughly 23,000 miles per hour

    That's very deceptive. It's the relative velocity of the comet and the probe that's important, not the absolute speed. If it really made contact going at 23,000 miles an hour relative to the comet.. well.. I don't think we can expect much useful science back from it.

    1. Re:Not really 23,000 miles an hour by imsabbel · · Score: 2, Informative

      thats the whole point!
      It has the relative velocity, just to smash a reall big hole into it. The analysation will be done from safe distance using spectroscopy.

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    2. Re:Not really 23,000 miles an hour by Cruithne · · Score: 2, Informative

      23,000 mph *is* the relative velocity of the comet and the probe. Useful science can and frequently does occur from smashing things together or big explosions - see the fields of cosmology, astronomy, and particle physics.

    3. Re:Not really 23,000 miles an hour by jswhitten · · Score: 4, Informative
      23,000 miles per hour is the relative velocity.

      http://www.spaceflightnow.com/deepimpact/050628mis sion.html

      Both the Deep Impact spacecraft and comet Tempel 1 are in their own unique orbits around the Sun. However, the comet is traveling substantially faster (29.9 kilometers per second (66,880 miles per hour)) than the spacecraft (21.9 kilometers per second (48,990 miles per hour)). ... the comet actually runs over it at a relative velocity of 10.3 kilometers per second (about 23,000 miles per hour).
      --
      -Jed
    4. Re:Not really 23,000 miles an hour by huge · · Score: 1
      absolute speed
      There is no such thing.
      --
      -- Reality checks don't bounce.
  25. Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They americans are shooting comets now.

  26. Countdown counter by rbarreira · · Score: 4, Informative

    Here it is

    I hope it's correct :)

    --

    The AACS key is NOT 0xF606EEFD628B1CA427BEA93A9CA9773F
    1. Re:Countdown counter by zoloto · · Score: 1

      In WinXP I've made this a part of my desktop via active desktop. Here's how:

      Open The Display properties (righ-click desktop, properties)
      Click the Desktop Tab
      Click customize desktop tab
      Click WEB tab
      Click "NEW"
      Enter http://www.spacetoday.org/SolSys/Comets/DeepImpact CountdownSmall.html as the URL
      Click OK
      Click OK again to get out of the display properties

      It's sitting on my desktop right now with the countdown. Nifty eh?

      ~z

    2. Re:Countdown counter by rbarreira · · Score: 1

      Nice idea, maybe I'll do the same :)

      But you made a small mistake - I think you used the URL tag which ocasionally haves slashcode inserting spaces in the middle of the url (it tries to avoid very long "words"). So everyone eliminate the space between "Impact" and "Countdown".

      Now that I've written this... Where do I think I am, in some gastronomy internet forum? :|

      --

      The AACS key is NOT 0xF606EEFD628B1CA427BEA93A9CA9773F
  27. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  28. I for one... by Nitromaroder · · Score: 1

    welcome our new space germs overlords!

  29. the creamy center by commodoresloat · · Score: 2, Funny

    Mmmm.... organic compounds....

  30. Incredibly tricky...... by anubi · · Score: 1
    To me, what NASA is doing appears to me to be damn near impossible, but they will probably do it.

    Trying to ram a space probe into a comet at 23KMPH.. looks roughly as tricky as firing two rifles and so as to hit the bullets mid-flight several miles away.

    And get it right on the first try.

    --
    "Prove all things; hold fast that which is good." [KJV: I Thessalonians 5:21]

    1. Re:Incredibly tricky...... by joeljkp · · Score: 1

      http://www.usatoday.com/tech/science/space/2005-06 -28-deep-impact-cover_x.htm

      Says team manager Rich Gramier of the Jet Propulsion Laboratory: "Basically, we have a bullet trying to hit a second bullet with a third bullet in the right place at the right time to watch."

      --
      WeRelate.org - wiki-based genealogy
  31. What if by fmobus · · Score: 1

    What if the destruction of this object triggers some orbit change in another (far away) body? I mean, this comet is supposed to pass near some other body, but due to our "attack" it doesn't. Just a randomic thought

    1. Re:What if by arkanoid.dk · · Score: 1

      Then the comet won't influence on anything else, therefore, not making any other objects go bananas... besides, they're not destroying the comet (doing so would require a little more than a small copper projectile), they're just smashing a part of the surface of it, to see what it consists of.

      --
      Arkanoid
      gethostbyintuition()... why not?
  32. Crash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    wouldnt sending something into a comet at that speed destroy all the organic compounds?

    just a thought

  33. True, but... by localroger · · Score: 1

    We didn't pound the crap out of the Moon with the LEMs. I do wonder if anyone had thought to look if we might have visually observed the impacts of any of the SIV-B's that were deliberately impacted. Those would have been considerably larger than the Deep Impact bullet, and a lot closer too. I can't find any hint that anyone tried to see them visually, though. If they impacted on lunar dayside, the whole event would probably have been lost in the glare.

    --
    Brackets contain world's first nanosig, highly magnified:[.]
    1. Re:True, but... by toddbu · · Score: 1
      If they impacted on lunar dayside, the whole event would probably have been lost in the glare.

      According to NASA, the Apollo 14 S-IVB impacted in an area that would have been relatively dark at impact. I say "relatively" because the impact was west of the Apollo 14 landing site and since landings were always performed in the lunar dawn to take advantage of shadowing (the 3D effect), it was probably pretty dark in that area when the S-IVB came plowing in at 6,000+ MPH.

      On an unrelated note, I've always thought it would be cool to collect a bunch of cash and then go scouting for an S-IC laying on the bottom of the Atlantic. I'm not quite sure how you'd recover it, but it sure would be a collector's item.

      --
      If you don't want crime to pay, let the government run it.
  34. I've got a dollar that says... by UberDork · · Score: 1

    ... they knock it off course and it comes plummetting into Earth, thus fulfilling the prophecy that one day, one of these things will hit us.

  35. Organic = Carbon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Organic compounds means compounds of Carbon... Not living tissue.

    1. Re:Organic = Carbon by The_Wilschon · · Score: 1

      Oh dang, I was hoping this would solve the organ donor deficit problem.

      --
      SIGSEGV caught, terminating

      wait... not that kind of sig.
  36. Posted elsewhere, sorry... by PHAEDRU5 · · Score: 1

    Texas-sized comet, accidentally knocked off-kilter by NASA probe, hits...
    T E X A S

    !!!!!

    Yeah, baby, yeaaaah!

    --
    668: Neighbour of the Beast
    1. Re:Posted elsewhere, sorry... by mmu_man · · Score: 1

      Let's just hope Bush be in his ranch by that time...
      (what makes you think I'm french ? :P)

  37. Re:So will I be able to see this in the north east by Phroon · · Score: 2, Informative

    Since when was Magnitude 10 easily binocular visible? Maybe if your at a really really dark site and know exactly where to look, but most people won't match these conditions. However, if it does jump up to Mag 6 as predicted, some people in rural locations might see it naked eye and it would be an easy target for binoculars.

  38. Deep Impact on dirty snowball theory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Proponents of the Electric Universe theory have gone out on a limb ahead of Deep Impact. They're predicting it will show comets are just rocks and not dirty snowballs.
    Controversially they assert comets are highly negatively-charged asteroids on eccentric orbits. As they travel further into the Sun's radial positive electric field, they discharge into space, expelling material at supersonic speed.

    1. Re:Deep Impact on dirty snowball theory by js7a · · Score: 1

      Yeah, well, I predict comets are both rocks and ice.

  39. Apollo did that by SiggyRadiation · · Score: 1

    They dumped a few Ascent-stages (2 IIRC) after docking with the command module. The crew left in the CM to earth and the ascent-stages were dumped onto the moon's surface. The descent-stages (that stayed on the moon's surface) could register the "moon-quackes" caused by the crashing ascent-stages. Because of the low gravity they kept bouncing off the moon's surface for quite some time.

    --
    This unique sig is intended to make this user more recognisable.
  40. miles? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What is this 'miles' you keep talking about? Some backwater concept?

  41. Obligatory by OrbNobz · · Score: 1

    That's no comet...
    Wait, that's no probe either, it's an ICBM!

    - OrbNobz
    I can't believe I'm not famous!

  42. I predict it'll be Apollo's chariot by SteeldrivingJon · · Score: 1


    I predict they'll find that it's really Apollo in his chariot, and boy, will he be pissed off.

    --
    September 2011: Looking for Cocoa/iOS work in Boston area Cocoa Programmer Quincy, MA
  43. Waste? Could have been better? by kantravi · · Score: 1

    Good idea, nice job, successful execution, lets wait for the data. But. Couldnt these folks have taken this amazing experiment 1 step further? I mean by actually using the comet as a vehicle for our data collection deep into outer space going farther and faster than our own machines. Good to learn about the comets composition and maybe we find something startling there, but the comets path(which we probably know, and hopefully it goes farther than anything we can reach) should provide a "cost effective" method of sending our "spies" out into the universe! I think if we latch onto these comets and can gather data, photographs etc we can have many many "hubbles" "working for us" out there! Or if too unrealistic, atleast we hope to see this as a very interesting scenario in a sci fi hollywood flick soon.

  44. lots of trajectory change fears/questions by simul · · Score: 1

    I have seen several comments from people who are concerned that we may alter the trajectory of Tempel 1.

    Hitting this comet is like hitting a 747 with a small pebble. It's highly unlikely that the 747 will crash.

    But it's *not* impossible. Suppose Deep Impact were to ignite material within the comet that it was designed to penetrate? Or suppose the crater were to spew ejecta for a long period of time (it already is spewing more than expected). Certainly, the impact of NASA's mission won't *directly* affect the trajectory (F=MA).

    However, the ejection of material from the comet, over the course of weeks or months, could easily affect the course of Tempel 1.

    But, space is big and the Earth is relatively very small. The odds of any trajectory alteration putting the comet on a collision course with Earth are many millions to one.

    So, rest easy. It's highly unlikely that some sort of Amageddon will occur over the next few years.