Slashdot Mirror


Genetic Research In The Heart of Amish Country

FrenchyinOntario writes "Insular, inbred communities like the Ashkenazi Jews and Indian tribes can be a bonanza of genetic information for researchers, and the Amish & Mennonite communities in the United States are proving to be fertile ground as well for scientists who want to better understand the nature of genetic diseases and how rare illnesses occur more frequently in such closed-off communities. The Amish, famous for their renunciation of a lot of technology, are embracing a lab that has been built in the centre of their community because their faith teaches them to "help their fellow man", recognizing that helping scientists better understand the genetic causes of diabetes, mental retardation, and some of the rarer diseases in their families, helps themselves as well as others. For a better understanding of the Amish and their approach to technology, Wired magazine ran an excellent story a few years back better illustrating why they are not just mindless kneejerk technophobes."

55 of 299 comments (clear)

  1. Duh by afidel · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Of course they are not mindless technophobes. For one thing every member of the sect is given a period in late adolecense where they are to go forth and experience the rest of society before they join the church. This insures that they have made a choice that is at least somewhat informed. They are an interesting group of very deeply religious folk who have very good reasons for believing as they do. Hell one of my favorite vacations was one where I didn't touch an electronic device for an entire week, it was SO much more relaxing than any other vacation I have ever taken that I have to sometimes wonder if I wouldn't be more happy if I were to give it all up and live life in the simpler fashion of the amish.

    --
    There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  2. Somewhat informed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If you spent a single year living as Amish people do, then you'd want to come back here, too. They send them out with little education and little support and no friends in the outside world. Of course they are going to come back after a year. They may think they are giving people the choice, but in the end, it's adding to the indoctrination because they come back thinking that they know what it's like outside their little community.

    I'm not criticizing the Amish here. I have no doubt that they mean well by doing this, but it is not a fair way to do the comparison.

    1. Re:Somewhat informed? by NanoGradStudent · · Score: 5, Informative

      The Amish (and I believe to a lesser extent, Mennonites in general) believe that you have to make a conscious and informed decision to be baptised and formally join their faith, so Rumspringa lets them have a taste of life on the outside. The majority usually decide to stay, but UPN had a reality TV show Amish in the City and for some reason, the four Amish that were featured all decided to leave the community. Probably had something to do with the fact that they put them up with a bunch of "English" in a big mansion, and got them doing various activities together.

      --
      Just a little guy, y'know?
    2. Re:Somewhat informed? by aussersterne · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's not just education and friends that are missing, either. Having grown up and been socialized in isolation from mainstream society, they possess a disctinctly different set of social skills and a different connotative vocabulary, both verbally and nonverbally.

      They lack the correctly formed tools to cope with basic aspects of the mainstream social world, things like dealing with separation and boundaries/emotional distance, the need to be assertive or to tolerate assertiveness in others, the "sixth sense" that most urban and even suburban dwellers develop about crime and dangerous situations, the expectations about what the rights/responsibilities of friendships and coupline relationships are, etc. It's not that they don't have any social tools or skills, it's just that theirs are all applicable to a very different society.

      It's rather like traveling to another country--you think it's nice to visit, but for most people, nothing feels as "comfortable" as being "home," for the very same reasons. Of course the difference is that for religious groups, visits outside the group aren't constructed as visits just to "other people" as they would be if an American visited New Zealand, but rather they are constructed as good vs. evil--you are leaving the "good" people to visit and explore the structurally opposed world of "apostates" or "heretics" or "nonbelievers," so the experience is in no way value-neutral, but rather begins with the expectation that the outside world isn't just different (and hence always at least a little uncomfortable), but that it is uncomfortable because of the presence of various kinds of evil presumed to be a property of the outside world, and conversely absent within the group.

      Thus, even for the most outgoing, life outside the community, while potentially exciting at first, ultimately seems both frightening and hollow, since nothing (including relationships and interpersonal communication) seems to respond safely in a manner that they expect, understand, or need as social beings, and they attribute this mismatch to nefarious forces.

      The problem isn't unique to the Amish, it's seen in children from nearly any intensively lived faith organized into insular communities, i.e. Mormonism, or hare krishna, etc. Even when someone decides that they want to leave the faith, life outside it can be so difficult to navigate and their methods of social interaction and personal development so dependent on its structures that it's easier just to stay inside the group as a nonbeliever.

      --
      STOP . AMERICA . NOW
    3. Re:Somewhat informed? by petrus4 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      >They lack the correctly formed tools to cope
      >with basic aspects of the mainstream social
      >world, things like dealing with separation and
      >boundaries/emotional distance

      Right. They don't need to know about "emotional distance," because they live in a society where people from outside an immediate family group actually give a shit about each other. Strange concept, I know.

      >the need to be assertive or to tolerate >assertiveness in others,

      Yep. Again, because they have a consistent social structure, they don't need to learn how to communicate in an environment where the heirarchical position of individuals is constantly in flux, depending on context. Each individual has a consistent position in the social pecking order, which makes life much easier.

      >the "sixth sense" that most urban and even >suburban dwellers develop about crime and >dangerous situations

      Again, their society doesn't include things like illegal drug use (and hence, no drug-related crime.) They don't have expensive consumer electronics as an incentive for theft, and being agriculturally based means that virtually anyone is able to get a job, regardless of lack of skill...so there is little incentive to steal.

      The bottom line is that in a vast multitude of areas, mainstream contemporary (corporate) American society is sick, degenerate, and unjustifiable. It is also primarily based in nearly every aspect on the concept of weakening and impoverishing the individual almost to the point of death, so that there is no possible chance of said individual being a threat to the homocidal parasites at the top of the heap. Sure, there's a whole heap of *talk* about the importance of individuality...but the intention behind that is actually the weakening of social cohesion...which again, leads indirectly to the weakening of the individual.

      By contrast, most non-mainstream indigenous or technologically regressive societies are based on the concept of *strengthening* both individuals and communities, and as such they form methods of achieving this over time. So yeah...anyone coming from one of those societies will experience problems...they'll need to undergo a paradigm shift...From being in a society where the emphasis is on doing things that *do* work to benefit human beings, to being in one (the mainstream one) where the specific intention is to emphasise doing things which are detrimental to human beings.

    4. Re:Somewhat informed? by rynthetyn · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Culturally, that part of the country is quite different whether you've grown up in the Amish community or not. My parents both come from the Lancaster/Lebanon county region in Pennsylvania, my mom's parents move to Florida when she was in highschool, leaving her older married siblings in PA. It's interesting to look at the part of the family who spent their whole life in one of those two counties as compared to the ones who moved away. The pace of life moves at a much slower tempo, the idea of buying your meat and produce at the weekly farm market is still alive and well, and in general their outlook on life hearkens back to an earlier time in American society.

      However, the Amish aren't so entirely isolated as you may think, you can't really escape the outside world, at least not anymore. They even retire to Florida like every other person in this country over a certain age does, there's a pretty large Amish community in Sarasota, Florida (not all retirees), a lot of the men work in construction jobs, which pay really well if you're a skilled craftsman. Incidentally, two of the people who went on Amish In The City had ties to Sarasota, one girl used to live there, another guy has been living there for a number of years, and given the quotes his friends gave the Sarasota paper, he definitely didn't have trouble adapting to life outside of the community (one friend was quoted as saying her first question to him when he got back was "who did you hook up with?")--that happens to be why I think the show was a joke, they pretended that the Amish on the show had never seen a city or seen the beach, but then they cast people who were living in a city right on the Gulf Coast of Florida, with beaches that people travel all the way from Europe just to visit.

      --
      Eagles may soar, but weasles don't get sucked into jet engines...
    5. Re:Somewhat informed? by dvdeug · · Score: 4, Insightful

      From being in a society where the emphasis is on doing things that *do* work to benefit human beings, to being in one (the mainstream one) where the specific intention is to emphasise doing things which are detrimental to human beings.

      If our society is detrimental to human beings, why do they depend on us for medical care? They get their idyllic society at the cost of being dependent on our society. They don't have to fight, because we provide the military that protects them. And anyone too disruptive can be exiled to the real world. They need us to keep their world running.

    6. Re:Somewhat informed? by Johnny+Mnemonic · · Score: 3, Informative

      Again, their society doesn't include things like illegal drug use (and hence, no drug-related crime.)

      Unfortunately, not quite true. And while the perps may be idiosyncrasies, note who their customers were.

      --

      --
      $tar -xvf .sig.tar
    7. Re:Somewhat informed? by slavemowgli · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Maybe I'm just playing devil's advocate now, but to me, that sounds a lot like communism. Not in the sense that the Amish society actually could be compared to communism, that is; but your description is akin to descriptions of communism in that it sounds good on paper, but leads to real problems when actually implemented that are conveniently ignored when a more theoretical description is given.

      Take, for example, the young man mentioned in a comment above who bought a laptop, and whose bishop took him and the laptop back to the store a few days later to give it back and ask for a refund. Yes, there certainly is a *reason* for this - the bishop didn't just do it because he didn't like the young man and wanted to make him suffer. But still, that's what happened, essentially; the man *wanted* a laptop, but couldn't get one "legally", and when he simply bought one anyway, he lost it again.

      I'm sure he wasn't too happy with that, himself. Of course, I do assume here that as an adult, he is able to determine what he really wants (no matter when it's about a laptop or community life or whatever) - one might argue that he simply didn't know or didn't think about the "greater good" of society as a whole, but I think it's necessary to accept that he was aware of what he was doing and its consequences and still reached a decision.

      Where does that all put us? Certainly, society as a whole dictating certain behaviour for individuals is not all that uncommon: it's the basic idea behind democracy, after all, that the majority can make decisions, even when not *every* single individual might like them. But there's more to democracy, too - it's also about personal freedom as well as non-interference. The latter concept in particular seems to be violated here: if I do something that doesn't hurt you, then you shouldn't be able to tell me that I can't do it. I derive the basic right to do it from the fact that I have personal freedom; and from the concept of non-interference, I can conclude that if I don't interfere with *your* personal freedom, then it really is OK.

      Of course, that is in stark contrast to Amish society, which - as pointed out in the Wired article, for example - does not value individuality and individuals as much as conformity and society as a whole.

      And that's OK, too, to a certain extent - if that's what someone wants, that's certainly fine. But it is important to note that in this sense, the Amish can be compared to any other sect (like the Hare Krishna, for example). And like with any other sect, while you may not find someone who will openly *tell* you that they don't like it, there will be people like that - and the mechanics that keep these people in the cults essentially against their will are well-understood. In the case of the Amish, sending people to the outside world without information on the social structures, without friends and so on just serve to reinforce the belief that the "English" world is not for them - and that's essentially a powerful deterrent to keep people from leaving the community or even speaking up against it. If you honestly believe that it's all you have, then are you going to destroy it? Certainly not.

      And that's really the gist of the matter. It's all about *choice*: if someone genuinely chooses to live the Amish way, then that's fine, but people also must be given a fair chance to say that they don't want to do so. And contrary to what is claimed by the Amish (and maybe even believed), they don't do that.

      --
      quidquid latine dictum sit altum videtur.
    8. Re:Somewhat informed? by Micah · · Score: 2, Informative

      >>> The Amish (and I believe to a lesser extent, Mennonites in general) believe that you have to make a conscious and informed decision to be baptised and formally join their faith

      Yes. I was raised Mennonite. Amish and Mennonites both come from the Anabaptist (which means they baptize again) movement. It began around 1525 or so as some people were convicted that many pracitces of the church of the day (both the Catholic and to a lesser extent later on the Protestant churches) were not lining up with what Jesus taught. One of the core values was "believer's baptism," following Jesus' example that baptism is not just a mindless thing you have done to you as a child, but a public declaration by someone who understood that they were making a lifelong commitment to follow Jesus Christ. Another core value, of course, was/is pacifism and nonresistance. These views cost them dearly in terms of persecution for a couple hundred years or so.

    9. Re:Somewhat informed? by dubious9 · · Score: 2, Informative

      They have not been "grown up and been socialized in isolation from mainstream society" as much as you might think. The world is all around them. I don't know if you've ever been to Amish country, but at least in Lancaster, PA, you can't really be isolated anymore.

      I know I alot of people that grew up there that played regularly with amish kids. The amish and mennonites would go to the local schools and participate in things like sports and other activities that were deemed acceptable. They know more than you'd think about pop culture. I know, I gotten drunk with some who were out on their own.

      None of them thought the outside world was "ultimately ... both frightening and hollow", but rather unfriendly and shallow. AFIAK, they all went back. Not because they weren't prepared for it, but because they *really* wanted to. The Amish don't pull any punches there. They want you to make a fully informed decision. They are not stupid and don't want you to come back because you were frightened. They'll ask you when you come back. They want to make sure that you're really coming back on your own accord. There's no pressure, subversion, or brainwashing. To compare them to cultish communities shows you really don't know anything about the amish.

      --
      Why, o why must the sky fall when I've learned to fly?
    10. Re:Somewhat informed? by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Nice to think that, though.

      They don't depend on us for medical care, if we withdrew it, they'd go on much as they have before modern medicine was available. They pay for it too, or do you think the AMA sends out doctors to Amishland to treat people for free, because they're all a bunch of big freeloaders? That they choose not to go to medical school themselves means little, did you insist that one of your own family go? Or maybe you're pissed that they don't do any medical research (hey bonehead, this article says that they're participating, in case you didn't notice). Well, if our superior capitalist system is doing its job, the cost of that research is factored in to the care that they pay for.

      They don't have to fight, you say? I know, I know. Everyone is nervous that Iraq will invade, and the Amish, well, they'll be sitting ducks. Wouldn't suprise me if that asshole Saddam launches scuds at them filled with kurdish nerve gas.

      And what about this exile thing? You obviously don't have a clue, but it's going to be so hard to inform you against your will. They allow people to voluntarily leave. They don't force anyone. Those that are disruptive (which happens very rarely) are usually shunned as I understand it. As long as they're willing to put up with that, nothing more happens. They don't do it for 3 weeks, and if the behavior still hasn't ended, they don't form a lynch mob and storm their house at night.

      They don't need us.

    11. Re:Somewhat informed? by Kaboom13 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Pacifist's are always parasitical. The world is not a happy fun place where if you don't piss anyone off they will leave you alone. The reality is if you have something someone else wants and no means to protect yourself they will come and take it. You really think if we somehow placated all the people we have pissed off over the years, abolished our military, and took up pacifism the world would leave us alone? How long would it be before countries that had lower standards of living and a military saw our wealth and wanted a piece of it. And because we are pacifists, any country that could get a hold of a boat and some guns could take anything they wanted. Current "pacifists" get by only because large, powerful countries like ourselves will protect them. All it takes to bring pacifism down is one group who realizes they can have anything they desire without any work by taking it with force. Noone considers invading us because they know we could crush them with superior m,ilitary might. If we lay down our arms, (and didn't have any militarily strong allies willing to protect us) how long till aggressive countries like China, North Korea, Cuba, etc. decided to take our wealth for their own? How long until the son's and daughters of the new pacifist america are drafted into the people's army at penalty of death? Pacifism is a pathetic excuse for a philosophy. What it boils down to is "we are better then to fight and die to protect our lives and belongings, let the unbelievers waste their lives protecting us". Pacifism can never work on a large scale without 100% participation (and even pacifist communities cant manage 0 violence among themselves).

  3. First hand knowledge by pHatidic · · Score: 4, Interesting

    One of the women who works there lives a couple doors down from me in CT. A bunch of years ago some of the Amish came over to her house to do build an addition, and they basically did it barn-raising style. Cool stuff. This has definitely been going on for 10+ years though.

    1. Re:First hand knowledge by WidescreenFreak · · Score: 4, Interesting

      That's VERY common around here. Many Amish barn/shed builders guarantee to have your entire structure built in a single day regardless (to a certain extent) of the size. Obviously a full-sized barn can't be done in a day, but there are many Amish builders who will guarantee that smaller barns and large sheds will be up before sundown. They're very, VERY skilled woodsmiths. Amish furniture is some of the most durable that you can purchase as well.

      No, I don't work for any Amish marketing board. Really. :) When you live 30 minutes from Lancaster, you see these things frequently.

      --
      The Overrated mod is for reversing inappropriate, positive mods, not for voicing disagreement with a post.
    2. Re:First hand knowledge by CrackedButter · · Score: 3, Funny

      I live 30 minutes from Lancaster but I have never seen any Amish around here in Blackpool.

  4. Did they consider Tasmania? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Over in Australia we have another group of people that are highly inbred, they live on the island state of Tasmania.

    There is even rumoured to exist the infamous "two-headed" Tasmanian which were thought to have been exterminated by the early settlers though the odd unconfirmed sighting is reported now and then.

  5. The Amish by petrus4 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The Amish are an extremely important cultural group, IMHO. I'd be lost without my computer, but aside from that I consider them a positive example to the rest of us (at least in some respects) where sustainable living is concerned. I've believed for a while now that despite having had some people laugh at them, it may well be that the Amish themselves will have the last laugh once peak oil hits. Their lifestyle also has numerous sociological benefits as well. It's fairly self-evident that the level of communal interaction is higher among less technologically oriented societies, as well as overall levels of apathy being a good deal lower. People from such communities tend to care a great deal more about their fellow man, and on a day to day basis, as well...not just when disaster hits. The rest of human society could learn a lot from them.

    1. Re:The Amish by petrus4 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They've kept knowledge of how to live independently of electricity within living human memory, for one thing. It is therefore possible to study their lifestyle and (in the event that for whatever reason, large-scale generation of electricity becomes impossible) learn how the rest of humanity might be able to cope with it.

      True, the picture of a low-technology lifestyle isn't *entirely* rosy...They have a much higher birthrate on average, and as the article points out, a much smaller population compared to the average means less genetic diversity, which in turn means more genetic problems, and *possibly* somewhat lower average intelligence. It would also possibly mean lower overall literacy...but there are a very large number of people within the general American population who do not have basic literacy and numeracy skills, either. It is entirely possible that the Amish actually have a rather superior education system, since the intention behind their system would actually be to educate...whereas the aim of the mainstream education system in most countries these days is likely a lot closer to penal reform.

    2. Re:The Amish by Eskarel · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I agree with some of this, but it's not really fair to base communal interaction on this sort of society because it's a very insular and homogenious society.

      Every member of the Amish community is very much like every other member, religiously, ethnically, even gentically(hence this article). Those who disagree with their way of life probably leave the society, there is little conflict, but there is little difference also.

    3. Re:The Amish by mochan_s · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Their lifestyle also has numerous sociological benefits as well. It's fairly self-evident that the level of communal interaction is higher among less technologically oriented societies, as well as overall levels of apathy being a good deal lower. People from such communities tend to care a great deal more about their fellow man, and on a day to day basis, as well...not just when disaster hits. The rest of human society could learn a lot from them.

      A professor mine used to say that if you used things like it's self-evident and obvious before a leap of logic, anything could be justified.

      I could say that it is obvious that no matter where you put humans they always live sociologically in a smiliar way. Put any animal society anywhere else they'll do the same things - same with humans. So, maybe your whole view is just grass is greener on the other side.

  6. Amish Paradise by Ranger · · Score: 2, Insightful

    illustrating why they are not just mindless kneejerk technophobes."

    As opposed to mindless kneejerk slashdot technophiles?

    Anyway time to get out Weird Al's Amish Paradise.

    --
    "You'll get nothing, and you'll like it!"
  7. Re:Evil plot? by NanoGradStudent · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Not to ruin a perfectly good joke, but for whatever reason, the Amish seem pretty gung-ho for biotechnology and what not (at least in their embrace of GM crops and what not). Another reason may be the fact that the Amish also all descended from a few hundred Swiss Germans (who did and continue to marry within themselves) so they suffer from the founder effect.

    According to the wikipedia article on the Amish, there was a 60 Minutes piece some time ago about a clinic the Amish themselves set up in Ohio in order to investigate Amish-only genetic diseases (including one that caused severe mental retardation and various other maladies).

    --
    Just a little guy, y'know?
  8. Re:A question. by cide1 · · Score: 4, Informative

    I've always always heard it as ah-mish, never the other way.

    Or you can just say "Pennsylvania Dutch" and be done with it... *smirk


    Not all Pennsylvania Dutch are Amish though. I come from a Pennsylvania Dutch family, and while my great grandparents spoke low-german, and were farmers, my great-grandfather also worked in a commercial dairy for an hourly wage. My great-grandparents was buried in a lutheran church, in York, PA. Amish have much stricter(simpler?) religious convictions, but on the outside, I can see how people confuse the two. My grandfather joined the Navy out of high school, and then went to college, as did most of the males from his community (WWII), and took a government job. He was a member of a lutheran church, and later an alderman of a methodist church for many years. If you met him on the street, you would have no idea, other than he is very careful about how he spends money (not cheap, but thrifty), tends to shun anything more than the basics, and values education over pretty much anything else.

    --
    -- the computer doesn't want any beer, no matter how much you think it does. NEVER, EVER feed your computer beer.
  9. Peak Oil by josh3736 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I've believed for a while now that despite having had some people laugh at them, it may well be that the Amish themselves will have the last laugh once peak oil hits.
    I've read a lot (from both sides) about Peak Oil and I've come to the conclusion that while the end of oil is nigh, the end of the world and civilization is not. The thing that Peak theories fail to take into account is the fact that as the price of oil-derived energy rises, the attractiveness of alternate sources also rises. As more people switch to alternate fuel sources, there will be more incentive for companies to put resources into research and the economy of scale will take over after a while.

    So yeah, it's not a good time to buy a new car, but the gears of industry aren't exactly about to come to a screeching halt.

    Of course, depending on how rough the transition is, the Amish very well could have a lot to teach us.

  10. Now please... by Jerk+City+Troll · · Score: 2, Interesting

    illustrating why they are not just mindless kneejerk technophobes.

    ...seriously, tell us how you really feel.

  11. Don't forget the Mennonites by WidescreenFreak · · Score: 4, Informative

    The main thing to remember about true Amish is that they're an orthodox branch of the Anabaptist church.

    The Mennonites are a non-orthodox denomination; however, to see them on the street together you'd have no idea which is the Amish and which is the Mennonite. Mennonites still hold onto the traditions except that they accept "modern" lifestyles - they own cars, TVs, computers, and so forth, but still honor the traditional dress and religious beliefs. My wife works with a Mennonite at a local grocer, and he's always in his straw hat and overalls whenever he works. It was actually a shock to see him in a "regular" suit and tie at the company Christmas party last year.

    I live about 45 minutes from Strasburg and go through that area often. There are Mennonite churches all over the place, even as far out as Carlisle and as far north as Selinsgrove (not that those names mean anything to people who are not from the area).

    Basically, if they own a buggy, they're Amish. If they own a car, they're Mennonite. :) But if they're standing side by side on a sidewalk you'd never be able to tell who is who.

    --
    The Overrated mod is for reversing inappropriate, positive mods, not for voicing disagreement with a post.
    1. Re:Don't forget the Mennonites by Baavgai · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Good point, but I believe it's even more broad that that.

      Within the Anabaptist groups, both Amish and Mennonite, there are a number a distinct sub groups. While the Mennonites are generally the more liberal of the two, the polar end of Amish can appear like Mennonite to an outsider.

      There are even Anabaptist groups that are much more modern than basic Mennonites, but outsiders often assume they are typical Mennonite and don't understand where the lines are. Unless you're part of the community, you'd never really know, anyway.

      Research in the "heart of Pennsylvania", that's Lancaster County. Used to be a nice quiet place were Amish and non Amish farmers lived peacefully together. Now it's a tourist trap. They bus people in, there are outlet stores and stores full of plastic crap selling authentic Pennsylvania Dutch drek. Amish are, quietly and systematically, fleeing this area in droves.

      Note, many posters assume the Amish is the base orthodoxy, with Mennonite being the relaxed offshoot. Curiously, it's slightly backwards from that. Menno Simons, an extremely early German protestant formed the group later called Mennonites. Jakob Ammann, a Mennonite, later branched off to form the Amish. He didn't think his group was being strict enough.

    2. Re:Don't forget the Mennonites by barawn · · Score: 2, Informative

      Mennonites still hold onto the traditions except that they accept "modern" lifestyles - they own cars, TVs, computers, and so forth, but still honor the traditional dress and religious beliefs.

      The traditional dress bits are choices, as with most things in the Mennonite church. So some Mennonites will wear traditional dress (like my grandmother) and some will not (like my aunt).

      As for technology, same thing goes - some Mennonites use cars. Others don't. It's pretty much just a very "cautious" view of technology, which is probably pretty wise, mind you, in the sense that they don't let technology change who they are.

      There are Mennonite churches all over the place, even as far out as Carlisle and as far north as Selinsgrove (not that those names mean anything to people who are not from the area).

      There are Mennonite churches all over the place. There are some areas that tend to be more concentrated. Near Eastern Mennonite University in Virginia, for one, in eastern Pennsylvania, eastern Ohio, around Chicago (hours around), but they're pretty much spread all over.

      Honestly, the percentage of Mennonites that you'd confuse for Amish probably diminishes every year.

    3. Re:Don't forget the Mennonites by Darby · · Score: 2, Funny

      Basically, if they own a buggy, they're Amish. If they own a car, they're Mennonite. :) But if they're standing side by side on a sidewalk you'd never be able to tell who is who.

      Sure you can. Offer them both a free iPod.

  12. Re:A question. by hopethisnickisnottak · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I know this might be slightly offtopic. But your reference to your grandfather's high regard for education brought this up.

    I guess valuing education very highly is a trait shared by the Brahmins of India. I come from a brahmin family and I assure you they're fanitical about education. Nothing's valued higher - not even money (although with globalisation that's changing). You could be rich as hell, but a pauper who's well educated will be respected much more than you.

    Over the years, the brahmins have been much maligned by being accused as being the sole perpetrators of the caste system. That wasn't completely true. There were three higher castes and one lower caste. The higher castes were the Brahmins, the Kshatriyas (warriors and administrators) and the Vaishyas (Merchants). The lower caste was that of the Shudras (menial labourers). While all three upper castes enjoyed the privileges of the caste system (which was not all negative - it had plenty of advantages too), it was the brahmins who have borne the brunt of the backlash post independence.

    --
    -Shaunak
  13. A Lancaster countian perspective... by Chordonblue · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've lived in Amish country now for some 17 years. When I was younger, I wondered about their community and what the deal was with their shunning of technology. After talking to a lot of my co-workers about it (many of whom were Old Order), the local bishop showed up on a lunch hour to help 'get me straight'.

    According to the bishop, the primary reason for avoiding technology had to do with 'idle hands'. Anything that takes them away from the community or their families is considered 'not good' and there really didn't have to be a specific reason for a bishop to disallow something.

    BUT... As much as the Amish outwardly show compliance, the truth is that many of them push the boundries with things like cell phones, solar cell recharging units (some roof-sized panels used to recharge batteries for electicity at night), and even computers. Clearly the letter of the law and the spirit of it are two different things.

    In later years I worked for a small computer store in Ephrata. We catered to the Amish and Mennonite communities as they are often VERY wealthy and shrewd business people (uneducated does not mean stupid), and if the technology is considered necessary, they will not hesitate using it. In most instances, we would end up selling a computer to a farmer who used it for their milking machines or keeping track of finances, or in one instance, an egg counting machine that ran Windows NT!

    One fine day however, we had a rather nervous looking young man come by on his bike and purchased (in cash) a brand new, top of the line, Acer laptop. Upon leaving he put the laptop in the cardboard box on the back of his bike, covered it up, and rode off.

    A few days later a buggy pulls up and its this poor fellow and his bishop. The bishop appologized for his parishner's mistake and asked politely if he could get a refund. All this, and the purchaser never looked up once. Of course we gave him one - our relations with the local community demanded that, but I sure felt sorry for that kid.

    --
    "...Well, there's egg and bacon; egg sausage and bacon; egg and spam; egg bacon and spam; egg bacon sausage and spam..."
  14. Re:Indians? by Dahan · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Native Americans"? I'm a native American, seeing that I was born and raised in America. However, I'm not Indian.

  15. Re:It's drumroll please... by rynthetyn · · Score: 4, Informative

    Thankyou, thankyou, thankyou. I remember visiting my grandparents in Pennsylvania, my grandmother would get really upset with tourists who would talk about wanting to go see the AIM-ISH like they were a tourist attraction.

    More entirely on topic, I think it's a good thing that the Amish evaluate technology and its impact on community instead of chasing after every new thing without thinking. There are both negative and positive consequences to technology, but in our culture we are driven only to look at the positive. The case can be made that the Amish methods of farming are much more environmentally friendly, there's less environmental impact farming with horses than tractors, and there have been particularly rainy seasons where the Amish were able to plant their crops much earlier than farmers using tractors because horses don't sink in the mud nearly as much as a tractor. But, that doesn't mean that even in farming, they don't use technology, they're able to get much higher crop yield today than a hundred years ago because they're willing to use high tech fertilizers (the case can be made that they get the best of both worlds that way). It makes perfect sense that they'll allow genetic research, they see how diseases are affecting them, and research on understanding those diseases will benefit their communities and everyone else.

    --
    Eagles may soar, but weasles don't get sucked into jet engines...
  16. Inbred diseased folks... by Baldrson · · Score: 2, Interesting
    1. The Amish have an incidence of autism that is less than 1/10th of the general population of the US.
    2. The Hutterites, even more inbred than the Amish, have been the highest growth rate, both population and economic, group of any Protestant heritage group -- including the Mormons.
    3. The Hutterites have a far lower rate of deliterious recessive disease expression than should be expected given their level of inbreeding. U of Chicago researchers who have been tracking their geneaologies for decades hypothesize Hutterite females must have some means of detecting when a Hutterite male has matching deliterious recessives.
    4. The Amish were forced into the cash economy when the government forbade their midwives from deliving their children. This had a traumatic effect according to friends of mine whose families have lived as neighbors to the Amish for generations.
    5. In case it slipped anyone's attention: mutations are typically recessive so if you want to see really novel evolution in action you are less likely to see it through cross breeding than through inbreeding. Yes, you'll see a lot more junk just because that's what mutations usually produce... but...
    1. Re:Inbred diseased folks... by kf6auf · · Score: 2, Informative

      It would be appreciated by all if you did not call the Mormons Protestant. I will start by saying that no one considers them Protestant: Christians by and large consider them to be non-Christians (and therefore non-Protestant); they consider themselves a unique denominational class and neither Protestant, Catholic, Coptic, nor Orthodox.

      I hope you noticed that I was neutral in the above paragraph: I pulled their claim to be non-Protestant off of their own website and I'm trying to be informative and not trying to start a flamewar.

    2. Re:Inbred diseased folks... by mochan_s · · Score: 2, Interesting

      ... U of Chicago researchers who have been tracking their geneaologies for decades hypothesize Hutterite females must have some means of detecting when a Hutterite male has matching deliterious recessives.

      Yeah, everyone is disgusted with incest and it's built into everyone. Why would the Hutterite females need a super sense?

      Marriage and mating is the most intricate of all social practices. Maybe the Hutterite has a mate selection system that minimizes the effects of interbreeding.

      Interbreeding is just a bad idea. All of a sudden the chances of problems go through the roof.

    3. Re:Inbred diseased folks... by nblender · · Score: 2, Interesting
      The Amish have an incidence of autism [google.com] that is less than 1/10th of the general population of the US.

      Widely believed to be a result of thimerosol (Largely Mercury) in vaccines. One Amish community studied for Autism had only 4 cases. 1 child had large exposure to mercury while really young, and the other 3 had been vaccinated when they were babies.

      http://salon.com/news/feature/2005/06/16/thimerosa l/index_np.html

    4. Re:Inbred diseased folks... by deaddrunk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Any follower of the teachings of Jesus Christ is a Christian. That's what the word means and no amount of wordplay is gonna change that.

      --
      Does a Christian soccer team even need a goalkeeper?
  17. Re:Indians? by kf6auf · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm sorry you dislike it when people, usually citizens of the United States (notice I am being politically correct here too and not using the term Americans which one might argue includes Canadians, Mexicans, and Latin Americans), use the term "Indians" to refer to the people who were native to the land when Columbus arrived. I even agree with you that people should use the term "Native Americans" more often because it minimizes genuine confusion. If I had to speculate, the reason the term is still used is because that is what people are taught in Kindergarten and because it is much more fun to play games with Indians and Pilgrims than it is to play games with "Native Americans" and "Immigrants Predominantly Fleeing Religious Persecution in Europe" since they sure weren't actually on a pilgrimage anywhere. Sadly, this probably isn't going to change, but if you wanted to be productive you could make polite comments about the inherent confusion in using the term "Indians" to refer to Native Americans that would at worst be ignored rather than moderated -1, Offtopic but more likely at least encourage the use of the term "Native Americans" in /. submissions.

    That being said, and in hope that maybe this comment won't be moderated totally offtopic, I found both articles very interesting and I suggest that anyone who hasn't read them to do so. Research like this will help many people with rare genetic disorders and I sincerely hope it can continue for many years. Now go ahead and moderate me offtopic anyway.

  18. are people allowed to join? by krunk4ever · · Score: 4, Interesting

    if people are allowed to leave, are people allowed to join?

    a search on google gave me this:
    http://www.800padutch.com/atafaq.shtml#join

    "Can an outsider join the Amish church/community?"

    "A local Amishman recently remarked, "You do not need to move here to adopt a lifestyle of simplicity and discipleship. You can begin wherever you are." Yes, it is possible for outsiders, through conversion and convincement, to join the Amish community, but we must quickly add that it seldom happens. First, the Amish do not evangelize and seek to add outsiders to their church. Second, outsiders would need to live among the Amish and demonstrate a genuine conversion experience and faith that results in a changed lifestyle. Third, it is extremely difficult for anyone who has not been raised without electricity, automobiles, and other modern conveniences to adjust to the austere lifestyle of the Amish. And to truly be a part of the Amish community one would need to learn the Pennsylvania Dutch dialect."

  19. Impressive workmen. by The+Tyro · · Score: 5, Interesting

    When I was growing up, one of my relatives was a physician in eastern Ohio, and had some amish patients. He was pediatrician and a strong christian, which was something the amish greatly appreciated. As a result, many members of their community brought their children to see him.

    He mentioned in passing to one of them that he was thinking of remodeling his kitchen. The amish man immediately stated "we could do that for you."

    I was there when they came to redo the place... it was one of the most amazing things I've ever seen. Two truckloads of people, men and women, and they worked from sunup to sundown, breaking only briefly for lunch. The workmanship was incredible... everything fit perfectly. They also put in all kinds of clever little gadgets; sliding racks for table leaves, concealed hangers for towels, pivoting shelves and rack for dishes and pots... I've been in million-dollar homes that didn't have a kitchen as nice.

    Whatever criticism are leveled at the amish, there's definitely nothing wrong their work ethic.

    --
    Even if a man chops off your hand with a sword, you still have two nice, sharp bones to stick in his eyes.
    1. Re:Impressive workmen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      But did he have place to plug in the microwave when they were done?

  20. More on the Mennonites--to further complicate it by rynthetyn · · Score: 3, Insightful

    While some Mennonites drive cars, not all of them do, and not all of them are plain. When my aunt and uncle lived in Cape Coral, Florida, they went to a Mennonite church that you would have no idea was a Mennonite unless they told you it was. They all dressed like everybody else, the music was contemporary, it basically looked like the modern American megachurch. And, even with the plain Mennonites who shun cars and electricity, you can tell them apart from the Amish if you know what to look for, they drive different kinds of buggies, the women wear different prayer caps, and there are several other distinctions.

    And, to make things more complicated, you also have to factor in the various Brethren groups, which may be more or less plain (my grandmother grew up plain brethren, I think it was after she married my grandfather that she became lutheran, which is what my dad grew up). Then there was the United Brethren, which was the first American grown denomination and was started by a Mennonite preacher in my great-great-great-great-great uncle's barn in the 1767, and which much of my mom's side of the family belonged to(at least those who didn't marry Mennonites). The best I can gather, at some point in the late 1800s they split, some of them joined up with the Evangelical Brethren to become the Evangelical United Brethren, which later merged with the Methodists to create the United Methodists. And so, in a nutshell, much of American religious history can in some way tie itself back in history to the Amish by way of the Mennonites (which are of course an offshoot of the Amish).

    --
    Eagles may soar, but weasles don't get sucked into jet engines...
  21. Re:Indians? by DanThe1Man · · Score: 2, Funny

    I think you got modded down automatically when you said you lived in India. You might want to keep that a secret on /.

  22. who's zoomin' whom by Dystopian+Rebel · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Christians by and large consider them to be non-Christians


    The above statement means little. Creationists of belief X usually consider Creationists of belief Y (where Y != X) to be lost sheep, damned, etc.

    A Google search for "are mormons christians" leads to some interesting reading. They seem to consider themselves to be Christians but the bigger kids on the block would rather not invite them to play.

    --
    Rich And Stupid is not so bad as Working For Rich And Stupid.
  23. Women? by OutOfMyTree · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The ability of people to write about a "community" without looking at women's lives is amazing (Do a count in any issue of National Geographic). Presumably half the Amish are female, but what do we learn of their experience of technology in these stories? Browsing around more widely, it certainly doesn't look like their invisibility is because they enjoy the same type of lives as the men.

    It would shed a great deal of light on the Amish if we were told what modern technology is considered acceptable for household chores, and how often men use it!

  24. The Gentle People by whatever3003 · · Score: 4, Interesting
    After reading this article I was horrified at the new insights about these bizarre people.

    The article tells of systematic rape and abuse with no punishment, and with generations of incest producing an inbred and backwards society, condoned by the american govt. giving them the legal right to police themselves, dealing out their own justice where they see fit.

    After reading the entirety of the article, it would be hard to dismiss this as an isolated case, but if you do and still consider that they represent some noble return-to-basics society and that their rejection of technology is somehow endearing, there are other sources, and a dedicated blog that may help to change your mind.

    --
    "Those who do not want to imitate anything, produce nothing." -- Salvador Dali
  25. Re:Nice. :) by QuickFox · · Score: 3, Funny

    The article did talk a lot about the relationships between the Amish and the English.

    -- Terrorism may have turned the United States into a nation of fear and aggression, but it won't succeed in Europe.

    --
    Terrorists can't threaten a country's freedom and democracy. Only lawmakers and voters can do that.
  26. "That's What It Means to Be Amish" by daigu · · Score: 4, Informative

    I remember reading a story - I believe it appeared in the Plain Reader - that talked about the Amish approach to technology:

    A bus load of tourists were visiting Amish country. At some point in their journey, someone on the tour asked an Amish elder what it means to be Amish.

    The elder started explaining about Jesus Christ - but before he got too far, he was stopped. "We know all about that, but what does it mean to be Amish?" He stopped, and thought for a moment.

    He then asked everyone on the tour, "How many of you have television sets?" Every hand went up. Then, "How many of you believe that television has a negative impact on your relationships with your family, your community and with God?" Most hands went up. He then asked, "Believing that television has a negative impact on your relationships, how many of you would give up television?" No hands went up.

    "That's what it means to be Amish."

  27. A Debian view on the Amish by g2devi · · Score: 4, Insightful

    > why do they depend on us for medical care?

    Think of it like a Debian user does.

    Debian has several repositories:
    * SID -- contains the latest and greatest, but it can be unstable and things may be
    * Testing -- contains those parts of SID that have been around a while don't seem to break anything
    * Stable -- contains those parts of Testing that have been around for a while and don't break things. Stable isn't updated that often, but receives constant security patches.

    Given this, let's describe how the Amish see it:
    * SID -- Geek enthusists who'll by anything new and shiny
    * Testing -- the rest of society who'll only use stuff that's actually useful
    * Stable -- Amish-like communities who'll only use generally available technology that is both useful and has a positive impact on their society.

    Now you might claim that the people who rely on Stable are in this privileged position because of all the people who use SID or Testing. You'd be right. But who cares? SID users are happy on the cutting edge, Testing users are happy with the less wild and wooly pace, Stable users are happy with the tried and true. Everyone wins.

  28. Amish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    I find the Amish the most interesting people in the US.

    The main misconception is the Amish hate technology. This is not true. They just do not want technology to control them.

    I'll give an example, if a vehicle can go faster than a horse it is banned. Why is this? Because people can then travel great distances and migrate away. Why is this a problem? Its a problem because it breaks up families. You know what, looking at my family that is precisely what happened! This is the main intention to take the rubber off the wheels of wagons ... it makes them go slower.

    The Amish do not like electricity because it comes from the grid. In other words, it makes people dependent on others. So, you can go into a store and the ceiling fan will be run from air pressure. Yep, there is a gas pump pumping air to make the fan go around. Little tubes all over the ceiling. The pump might be running vegetable oil. Or they can store fuel ... the point is they are in control.

    What is interesting is I saw some Amish using power tools. Yet, the tools were plugged into a portable generator and not the grid.

    If there is a telephone it is outside the home. Why is that? Because strangers are not allowed inside the home. You have to get permission to use the phone and go outside. You see, technology is not in control again. Having a t.v. in the house is like inviting in a child abuser...and it is!

    In the 60s, the US government tried to take over Amish schools and force their children to public schools. They fought that and won. See, more control...there was another school system in place before the feds and the 60s school take overs.

    Its very nostalgic to see a horse drawn cart harvesting a field of corn. No gas used and totally independent.

    They still have 5-6 children per family. So, in another century they will probably be a majority of the population in their state. Not dependent on immigrants to flip burgers. Again they are in control.

    What's great is $60 oil, electric grid going out, router down ... it just does not matter. They are totally independent. This flies in the face with todays elite trying to make everyone 'interdependent'. I find it fascinating.

  29. Possibly lower average intelligence? by Spirckle · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I would say it's probably average, at least in my experience. I went to an Amish Mennonite elementary and middle school and we took the state educational evaluation tests every year. EVERYBODY in my grade placed above state average, even the *dumb* ones.

    Amish and Mennonite intelligence is applied differently maybe. And in some sense even the ones that try to assimulate into the larger culture are always on the outside looking in. Its not a bad thing. It gives great perspective.

    --
    Using the best knowledge of today to create the problems of tomorrow.
  30. Re:Indians? by Dlugar · · Score: 2, Funny

    Apu: Today, I am no longer an Indian living in America. I am an Indian-American.

    Lisa: You know, in a way, all Americans are immigrants. Except, of course Native Americans.

    Homer: Yeah, Native Americans like us.

    Lisa: No, I mean American Indians.

    Apu: Like me.

    --
    Computer Go: Writing Software to Play the Ancient Game of Go
  31. Weedstock, the Amish, and Hemp by bmasel · · Score: 2, Interesting

    9 years ago I organised Weedstock, a 3 day benefit for NORML, and "Agricultural Educational Event" in Monroe County, Wisconsin. The rural area is heavily amish, tho our host was not.

    The County authorities reluctantly acknowledged our 1st Amendment right to hold the event, but sought ways to agressively enforce the marijuana laws with "traffic' stops of those entering and leaving. They sought to use the Amish neighbors' land as staging and surveillance posts, but were refused.

    I later heard from our host that he'd met with the 80 odd year old bishop, who, on hearing of our advocacy of reintroducing hemp as a fiber crop, went on a tirade against the Federal Government's ban on this useful plant, which his people had used extensively, especially for handwoven clothing.

    --
    Ben Masel: 51,282 votes for US Senate in the Wisconsin Democratic Primary