Body Scanners for the London Underground

Ronald Dumsfeld writes "In a report in the TimesOnline, it is alleged that those lovely see-through-your-clothes scanners are to be installed in London's Tube stations. Part of the UK's Military-industrial complex, QinetiQ stands to make £150,000 to £2 million per station ($260,000 - $3.4 million) with their Millimetre Wave Imagers."

Comments

Appeasers go to hell

[ccmay]

how about we not occupy/invade/bomb/etc other ppls homes and countries so we don't have to live like this?

You're a deluded fool if you think that will help.

We could bring back every soldier, throw Israel to the wolves, quintuple aid to the Muslim world, and not one thing would change.

Osama and his crew are still bent out of shape about the reconquest of Andalusia in 1492.

They harbor bitter resentment about the Balfour Declaration and Sykes-Picot Agreement and the fall of the Ottoman Empire, dating back 80 years or more.

They planned the September 11 attacks long before Bush ever came to power, at a time when the American military was fighting Christian Serbs to protect Muslims in Bosnia and Kosovo.

The Islamists have made it abundantly clear that they will not stop fighting jihad until the whole world lives under a Muslim caliphate. There is no reasoning with such people. We kill them, or they will surely kill us. Now they have nuclear weapons in Pakistan and are on the verge of obtaining them in Iran. Next time they attack London, there could be a hundred thousand casualties rather than 50.

And with the relative birth rates of Muslims vs. the native populations of Europe, the time is rapidly approaching when Europe will have to decide whether to submit to Sharia law, or expel their Muslim population by force. I'm not kidding. Italian and French women are having 1.2 babies per lifetime, while Muslim women in the same countries are brood mares producing five or six little jihadis each. Demography is destiny, and there is no third option.

-ccm

Re:Appeasers go to hell

[Kent Recal]

What a pile of uninformed, over-exaggerated, racist bullshit.
I suggest we just keep on expelling people like you and darwin will take care of this nonsense.

Re:Appeasers go to hell

[ccmay]

American emperialism is not limited to the middle east, nor did it start with this administration.

Even granting such a thing exists, which I do not, how is this relevant to my point about the radical Islamists harboring grievances that are five centuries old? Do you think discussions or appeasement have any place when dealing with such people? In their words, "We are not trying to negotiate with you. We are trying to destroy you."

out of over 1 billion muslim worldwide, how many are terrorists?

Of course they are not all terrorists. However, the incidence is surely much greater than among Irishmen or Montanans, intolerably high in my opinion. Sorry the rest of the Religion of Peace has to suffer for the actions of a few, but that is not my concern.

What percentage would you tolerate before agreeing that allowing further Muslim immigration into the West is a mistake? 1%? 10%? 50%? Everybody needs to ask themselves this question before calling me a racist.

It's a difference of degree and not of kind. Suppose you knew that 50% of Muslim immigrants were planning to set off bombs in the Tube, but you couldn't really tell which 50%. Would your precious liberal multi-cultural pieties make you meekly accept this? I don't think so.

Thomas Friedman made the same point in the New York Times just the other day. The time is coming when the nations of the West will make no distinction between peaceful Muslims and the head-choppers. All of them will be quarantined to their own countries.

-ccm

Re:Appeasers go to hell

[ccmay]

For a start who are 'The Islamists'? This sounds like a whole people that you are stereotyping under one label.

The Wahabbi/Salafi school of Sunni Muslims, in particular. We should be targeting the most radical imams for execution or imprisonment, destroying their mosques and madrassas, and deporting their members by the tens of thousands. This is war and it's time we treated it as such.

scaremongering about relative birthrates and how this means that we'll end up under Muslim domination.

Sneer all you want, chum. It doesn't change the likelihood that your grandchildren will either have to kill many Muslims, or become Muslim themselves.

You sound like a fully paid up member of the BNP

That is an example of the logical fallacy of reductio ad Hitlerum. It does not address the truth or falsity of my assertions.

-ccm

The perception of guilt

[zogger]

You are aware a security company was conducting "exercises" on 7-7 in London simultaneously with the attacks? About bombs going off in the subway and on busses? At the *exact* same time the *exact* attack occurred in *exactly* the manner in which it happened? Reported on BBC audio, poofed away now.

This isn't ringing alarm bells for you over this terrorist attack? You really believe in coincidences of this magnitude? You just blindly accept big brothers government instantaneouly whenever they decide to tell you something?

Same thing happened in the US ith 9-11.

It's morning, enjoy some coffee, smell the aroma, breathe deep and *wake up*. Shake the cobwebs out.

Re:I"d Rather Be Scanned Than Murdered

[reallocate]

That's a good little teen-aged moron, Come back when you grow up and get a brain that's bigger than your testicles.

Re:The perception of security

[kraut]

>Do you vote for somebody who has lied to you? The Spanisch didn't.

The Americans did. Well, 50.2% (roughly) did,

The British did. Well, 36% of those that voted did, but thanks to the ridiculuous voting system, that counted as a resounding victory for Bliar.

51% voting against Europe in France was a crushing defeat, 64% voting against Blair a resounding victory. Go figure.