Slashdot Mirror


AMD Alleges Intel Compilers Create Slower AMD Code

edxwelch writes "In AMD's recient anti-trust lawsuit AMD have examined the Intel compiler and found that it deliberatly runs code slower when it detects that the processor is an AMD. "To achieve this, Intel designed the compiler to compile code along several alternate code paths. ... By design, the code paths were not created equally. If the program detects a "Genuine Intel" microprocessor, it executes a fully optimized code path and operates with the maximum efficiency. However, if the program detects an "Authentic AMD" microprocessor, it executes a different code path that will degrade the program's performance or cause it to crash.""

10 of 912 comments (clear)

  1. Simply ludicrous by DeadSea · · Score: 5, Funny

    That is an outragous claim! No company would stoop so low. Why, that would be like claiming that Microsoft configured its servers to give broken HTML to browsers other than Internet Explorer. That would be like saying that Apple gave away free MP3s that work in the Ipod but that crash other music players. That would be like saying that Adobe publishes pdfs that b0rk XPDF.

    Anybody can see that this claim is ludicrous and that things like this just don't happen. (but I hope I'm not giving anybody any ideas.)

    Type your currency conversion into a free form text box

    1. Re:Simply ludicrous by cwebb1977 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Hey, Microsoft doesn't even know the difference between correct and broken HTML!

      --
      www.weberseite.at
    2. Re:Simply ludicrous by ssyladin · · Score: 5, Funny

      Neither does Slashdot.

    3. Re:Simply ludicrous by wo1verin3 · · Score: 5, Funny

      >> Well, I don't think they would make such a claim
      >> without at least some sort of evidence

      We agree.

      - darl

    4. Re:Simply ludicrous by HunterZ · · Score: 5, Funny
      --
      Arguing about vi versus Emacs is like arguing whether it's better to make fire by rubbing sticks or banging rocks.
  2. I do that ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    In version 1.0 of my software, I always throw in some loops that just count to a million to throw in some delays. That way you can include "optimization" as a deliverable for version 2.0.

    profit!

  3. Re:It's true--and they know about it by Penguin+Programmer · · Score: 5, Funny

    I switched back to Visual C++.

    And when a Microsoft product is the lesser of two evils, you know for sure that there's something fishy going on.

  4. Re:Where is all this going by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 5, Funny

    I am huge AMD fan myself

    Well, they do require quite a lot of cooling, don't they?

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
  5. Re:CmdrTaco == automated script by Andrewkov · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hey, don't blame Taco, maybe the Intel perl compiler insterts random spelling errors into text strings!

  6. Re:Regulators Raid Intel Offices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    On that note, was there *anything* negative that came of the Microsoft monopoly ruling?

    Well for starters, Microsoft is still here.