Slashdot Mirror


Falling Window Cover Damages Discovery

Mz6 writes "At 5:30PM EDT, one of the space shuttle's protective window covers fell and struck the left Orbital Maneuvering System engine pod on Discovery today. The window cover hit the carrier panel around the OMS pod. NASA is taking a new panel to the launch pad to replace the one hit by the falling cover. NASA is expected to know by 7 PM EDT if the replacement panel will work and whether launch can proceed tomorrow as planned. The window cover in question is from one of the overhead windows. It fell on its own, not when workers were handling it. The cover was found after it had fallen and hit the orbiter. In addition to the carrier panel that workers plan to replace tonight, engineers are looking for any other damage." Update: 07/13 02:03 GMT by T : RmanB17499 points out a CNN story according to which "the launch of the space shuttle Discovery will go ahead as scheduled Wednesday after technicians replaced two protective tiles damaged near the spacecraft's tail Tuesday, a NASA spokeswoman said."

35 of 360 comments (clear)

  1. It fell on its own? by nokilli · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Dudes, the question here isn't whether the engine pod is damaged, it's what's going to fall off the shuttle next?

    This ain't no beer run these guys are going on, and it ain't like the hood ornament just decided to liberate itself. Most of the shit on the shuttle is like, important, right?

    If I was captain of this upcoming mission, I'd be spam clicking the red alert button right about now. Maybe call in sick. Gotta have some unused vacation time coming to me, right? Use it or lose it!

    I never liked the shuttle. A bunch of engineers were tasked with the job of building a reusable space vehicle, so they paint some wings on a rocket, give it a windshield, and call it a space plane. So it can return cargo, so what? Name something they brought down back from space that is worth all of the trouble we've gone through to glide back to Earth rather than parachute.

    I'm pretty sure the Pan Am shuttle in 2001 could take off on its own. That was the whole point of the cut scene from the monkey throwing the bone in the air to the space vehicle, as if to say, "Look, no rocket boosters!"

    And the only thing that fell off of anything in the movie was Frank.

    1. Re:It fell on its own? by cdrudge · · Score: 5, Informative

      It was just a temporary plastic protective panel that they place over the actual window while it just sits ready to launch. It's not really "attached" to shuttle like most pieces would be.

    2. Re:It fell on its own? by ThreeE · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Vital? It was a freaking protective cover that's taken off prior to launch anyway!

      More FUD.

    3. Re:It fell on its own? by Mulletproof · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The Saturn V WENT TO THE MOON The mission was orders of magnitude DIFFERENT. Please. These apples to oranges comparisons get old fast.

      --
      You need a FREE iPod Nano
    4. Re:It fell on its own? by Rei · · Score: 4, Interesting

      In fact, to further that point, I used to work at Rockwell-Collins, which was mandated to use very strict time reporting procedures while I was there. Why? They were caught (thankfully!) after several years pulling one over on the government with the Shuttle contract. Whenever any Rockwell project ran overbudget, they charged the hours to the Shuttle. There were so many people working on the shuttle project that even with all of that "dot the i's and cross the t's" paperwork that NASA is famous for, they still couldn't prove that the company was cheating them for several years. Eventually they got a full audit, Rockwell got punished, etc.

      --
      "It felt almost as good as stealing cars from grandma." -- Margaret Thatcher, probably.
    5. Re:It fell on its own? by Planesdragon · · Score: 3, Informative

      Best on the planet? Yes.

      Best dual-purpsose heavy-lifter and crew transport? Well, yeah.

      But it's not a good enough heavy lifter that it replaced rockets. And it's not a good enough crew transport that everyone else is trying to build one.

      I've heard that some of the shuttle engineers even balked when told of their budget cuts. They argued--quite rightly--that doing it right the first time would save money over the long run.

      If only, if only, if only.

    6. Re:It fell on its own? by Rei · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Not only that, but so many here seem to have the following stupid notion: that you can just "toss junk out the window" in space, or whatnot. To get junk off of, say, ISS, you have to apply significant delta-V to it. That means, bare minimum, you'd have to develop a rocket system that is safe to operate near ISS, and a way to load your trash/experiments into. Soyuz can't keep up with ISS waste; it's cargo return is minimal.

      I don't have the exact numbers offhand as to how many satellites (let alone tons of waste) the shuttle has returned, but I recall that it was in the range of 30-40 (many of those being experiment satellites whose design was to have them returned - engineering reentry survival into all of them would have cost an utter fortune).

      As for "glide back to earth rather than parachute", I think you should ask the crews of Soyuz 23 or Soyuz 18-1 what they think of parachute landings. This is, of course, ignoring the fact that making capsules reusable is a lot harder than spacecraft, because there's almost always some deformation (and/or saltwater corrosion, depending on the landing site) on impact.

      --
      "It felt almost as good as stealing cars from grandma." -- Margaret Thatcher, probably.
    7. Re:It fell on its own? by dmadole · · Score: 4, Informative

      When the they designed the lunar lander, they had to have something that would work 100% to get off the moon, and they used... a solid fuel rocket.

      No, the lunar lander used liquid-fueled engines, powered by nitrogen tetroxide and unsymmetrical dimethylhydrazine, for both the ascent and descent stages.

      More information on the lunar module and the fuels it used is widely available, as is information on thier development.

    8. Re:It fell on its own? by Pollardito · · Score: 4, Funny
      What are they worried about - falling birds?
      they're worried that the protective cover on the nose cone will fall off on its own and hit the windshield
    9. Re:It fell on its own? by Oriumpor · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It does say much to the integrity of the entire shuttle that something as small as a thin-plastic window cover can damage the shuttle's heat shielding. What if, oh I don't know, a seagull hit the shuttle during liftoff?

    10. Re:It fell on its own? by damiam · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Chances are good that you drive a car, which is a helluva lot more dangerous than this is

      Let's not exaggerate too much here. 1 out of every 56 shuttle launches/landings have ended with the death of the crew and loss of the shuttle. If you had a 1/56 chance of violent death every time you accelerated/braked your car, I think you'd think twice about driving too.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    11. Re:It fell on its own? by snuf23 · · Score: 4, Informative

      The Saturn V was also used to place the Skylab Space Station in orbit. The Saturn V was also intended to be used to do the "heavy lifting" for future space station work, with the Space Shuttle handling logistics and assembly of components. Funding was cut for the Saturn V program leaving the U.S. without a launch vehicle capable of the Saturn V's tremendous capacity.
      In comparison the Saturn V had a lift capacity of 118,000 kg to low Earth orbit vs. 28,800 kg for the Space Shuttle.
      I agree the shuttle and Saturn V were made for different purposes, but I do believe if you are strictly dealing with putting stuff in orbit the Saturn had lower cost per kilogram. That comparison isn't really worth much because it ignores the flexibility of the Space Shuttle and its uses beyond just shuttling cargo.

      --
      Sometimes my arms bend back.
    12. Re:It fell on its own? by RexDart · · Score: 4, Funny

      So the shuttle was possibly damaged by a crashing windows patch? ;) Best add the BillBorg icon to this story.

      --
      "Yes, Jayne, she's a witch. She's had congress with the beast..."
      "She's in Congress?" - Firefly, "Objects in Space
    13. Re:It fell on its own? by JFitzsimmons · · Score: 5, Funny

      If you were a seagull, I think the massive roaring white thing with fire coming out its ass would be something that you would AVOID. And it isn't exactly a stealth jet either, you've got plenty of advance "notice".

      --
      Beware he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he dreams himself your master. -Anonymous
  2. Already fixed by cdrudge · · Score: 4, Informative

    CNN is reporting that NASA has already given the go ahead for Discovery to launch. The damaged tiles on the tailfin have already been repaired.

    1. Re:Already fixed by cujo_1111 · · Score: 4, Funny

      I hope the glue and dope that holds the balsa and tissue paper together is dry in time for launch...

      --
      If I point out that you are incorrect, making me a foe does not make you any more correct.
  3. Funeral by Selfbain · · Score: 3, Funny

    Why don't they just hold the astronauts funerals before they launch so they can attend.

    --
    Well, it has never been successfully tested.
    1. Re:Funeral by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      this calls for the rarely used but often called for "+1 Tasteless" mod

  4. windows this, windows that by ne0n · · Score: 5, Funny

    all i ever hear is whining about windows here! ;)

    --
    $ :(){ :|:& };:
  5. If God Had Meant Man to Go Into Space by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 4, Funny


    He would have given us something better than a space shuttle.

  6. Re:It Fell off? by cdrudge · · Score: 3, Informative

    It's a plastic cover that comes off before launch. It would never have even gone up in orbit anyways.

  7. Re:Vulnerable by Inominate · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "Damage" to the space shuttle is common.
    Heat tiles are frequently found to be missing when the shuttle lands. Small minor damage is not uncommon. What brought down columbia was more a case of a golden bb than anything else. (Plus it was a heavy object traveling quite fast)

    That said, space is a pretty easy environment to survive in. It's the part where you're burning a few thousand tons of explosives, and slowing down from 20,000mph using the atmosphere that are the dangerous parts.

    The damage that occured to the space shuttle here is trivial.

  8. Again with the shuttle? by tono · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm afraid I have to echo the sentiment here. I don't care if the cover was designed to come off, the problem is it FELL off no human interaction required. They had to repair tiles on the tail from where the bit of plastic hit the shuttle. If I were an astronaut, that wouldn't exactly inspire confidence in me. Christ, who puts these things together, the guy down the street with the beat up pinto? It's time to retire the shuttle and just pay the russians to launch us until there is a suitable replacement. Remember people, the simpler the design the fewer points of failure there are. Seems like if Burt Rutan can get it right NASA should be able to too.

    --
    cheese logs keep my wang warm at night.
  9. They aren't safe enough! by stefanlasiewski · · Score: 4, Funny

    Obviously these new safety measures aren't safe enough!

    I hearby propose that NASA create a new covering to cover the existing "window-cover", to ensure that the existing "window-cover" isn't damaged while it's protecting the actual window.

    --
    "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."
  10. The Vomit Comet and protocol by gardyloo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Some of my colleagues here have flown several times on one of the KC-135s that NASA has used (until it gets replaced relatively soon) for micro-g experiments. The testing that their research equipment had to go through to even be allowed on the flights were really very rigorous. Each aluminum stay had to withstand so much torque, each bolt had to be tightened just so, the electronics had to take such-and-such a shock, tools have to have velcro on them, and the frame had to have so much of the opposite-gender velcro so that things could be anchored, etc.
    What amazed everyone is that one group was not required to pressure-test their pressurized vessel, and a window blew out during one of the flights, sending nice bits of glass all over. Now, how can all of these other (arguably over-specified) aspects of the experiments be so rigidly-controlled (with carefully-worded protocols for everything), and they leave out PRESSURE TESTING GLASS WINDOWS?

  11. Can we see it fall from 107 angles? by loddington · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Where is the footage? I expect to see images of the cover falling off from the 107 cameras they recently installed.

    --
    --- Who put this sig here? ---
  12. True, but... by jd · · Score: 3, Interesting
    ...it does indicate a slight... negligence on the part of the engineers doing the final prep work. Right about now, I'd be inspecting the shuttle for all the things that the engineers DIDN'T come clean over. (People treading on something fragile, that sort of thing.)


    So, true, the Shuttle isn't falling apart at the seams. However, the indication is that the engineers either rushed some of the prep work or failed to set adequate precautions in place. In either case, they may have messed up elsewhere and not said.


    If you were up there, knowing that the world's media was focussed on your every twitch, knowing that any delay would finish any chance of you having a future but that any unconfessed and unobserved error on your part would be utterly untracable, would you be willing to take the fall?


    Given that kind of pressure, I'm not confident that other accidents haven't happened. All I can do is HOPE they haven't and that NASA will take the time to verify as best they can in the time that they haven't.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    1. Re:True, but... by Rei · · Score: 4, Insightful

      (sarcasm)It's not like the craft and launch assembly have hundreds of thousands to millions (depending on how you measure) of often precision-engineered individual parts or anything...(/sarcasm)

      Getting to anything orbit (as opposed to suborbital) is a huge task. Getting a huge, man-rated craft to orbit is a Herculean one. You better believe that almost every one of those engineers has been sacrificing their personal lives to try and make their "baby" as safe as possible. Seriously, talk to a NASA aerospace engineer some time about the craft that they're working on; you'll find people who do things like build a spectrometer for a probe who dote on it more than they do their own children.

      There's going to be a lot of missed breaths when that countdown nears zero.

      --
      "It felt almost as good as stealing cars from grandma." -- Margaret Thatcher, probably.
  13. Time Warp? by Stelminator · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "NASA is expected to know by 7 PM EDT"
    posted: 8:21PM

    anyone else think that maybe we could've had an update before this hit the front page?

  14. Here's a head-scratcher... by jpellino · · Score: 5, Funny

    "The lightweight plastic cover on one of Discovery's cockpit windows came loose while the spaceship was on the launch pad, falling more than 60 feet and striking a bulge in the fuselage, said Stephanie Stilson, the NASA manager in charge of Discovery's launch preparations. No one knows why the cover -- which was held in place with tape -- fell off, she said. "

    Maybe it fell of because IT WAS HELD ON WITH TAPE!

    Who's in charge over there - Red Green?

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
  15. Re:slashdot, the AP regurgitator by Quirk · · Score: 3, Insightful
    "Why is it that virtually everything I read on slashdot, I've already seen on the AP/Reuters wire stories from my paper?"

    The short answer is you've got too much time on your hands.

    I put in 12/14 hour days, too often 7 days a week. I'm a quick study and an experienced researcher, but, even with those skills I only manage to stay abreast with news out of /. and the Reg. I read the headlines from a few feeds, but have to steal the time to read the full articles.

    You and the others who jump on /. for lagging behind your reading must do not much else but casually surf the web satisfying your whimsy. Alot of us can only find the time to choose one or two sites to keep us informed. Contrary to the /. critics /. does a fine job of keeping me informed about "stuff that matters."

    cheers

    --
    "Academicians are more likely to share each other's toothbrush than each other's nomenclature."
    Cohen
  16. In Other News: by VectorSC · · Score: 3, Funny

    In other news, the space shuttle launch was canceled early this morning when an errant piece of seagull excrement struck the shuttle directly on its ceramic heat shielding and caused a 16 square foot hole.

    Shuttle commander Eileen Kahlins saw the bird dropping strike the orbiter while talking with the media about her confidence in NASAW's (1) ability to meet tomorrow's launch window. Amid the rain of ceramic tiles and structural members around the podium she was speaking from, she was heard commenting to NASAW director Sean O'Keeth, "I thought you said you fixed that, you a**hole."

    A heated arguement ensued, live, on national television, but was cut short when O'Keeth was struck down by a full HWSU (2) container falling from the orbiter. Kahlins immediately left the scene, telling reporters she had some vacation time coming.

    (1 NASAW: National Association of Stupid Aerospace Wankers)
    (2 HWSU: Human Waste Storage Unit, Solid)

    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

  17. Shuttle Man - The Musical by Bad+to+the+Ben · · Score: 4, Funny

    With apologies to Elton John's Rocket Man:

    They slashed the funds last night pre-flight
    Zero hour nine a.m.
    And something else will fall off by then
    I miss the earth so much I risk my life
    The tech is out of date
    On such a priceless flight

    And I think it's gonna be a long long time
    Till NASA comes around again to find
    They don't have funds to get my back to home
    Oh no no no I'm a shuttle man
    Shuttle man, 107 cameras but no rescue mode

    ISS ain't the kind of place to sit for weeks
    In fact it's cold as hell
    And Atlantis might not work if you did
    And all this budget I don't understand
    It's just my job five days a week
    A shuttle man, a shuttle man

    And I think it's gonna be a long long time...

  18. What color was it? by buckhead_buddy · · Score: 3, Funny

    What I want to know is what color these protective covers are. It could give a whole new meaning to the term Windows Blue Screen of Death.

  19. Obligatory Armageddon Quote by http101 · · Score: 3, Funny

    "Hey Harry."

    "Yeah."

    "Did you know we are sitting on 2 million gallons of fuel, a nuclear weapon and a thing with 270,000 loose parts that was built by the lowest bidder. Kinda makes you feel good dont it?"

    JKXXMXN

    --
    -- Game Developers: Stop porting badly-textured games from crappy console systems!