Slashdot Mirror


Googling May Break Copyright in Canada

twray writes "From The Globe&Mail: Could it be possible that Canada will make Google or any other Internet search and archiving engines illegal? Bill C-60, which amends the Copyright Act and received its first reading in the House of Commons on June 20, suggests it could be illegal for anyone to provide copyrighted information through "information-location tools," which includes search engines."

25 of 333 comments (clear)

  1. I don't see anything wrong with this. by King_of_Prussia · · Score: 1, Funny

    It is similar to watching the original Star Wars movies -- the ones that no longer represent Lucas' artistic vision. By watching them you are breaking a social contract and are probably violating the DMCA. Google is doing the same thing by archiving outdated pages which can still be shown as the result of a search.

    --

    Making the moon less necessary since 1998.

  2. Bill C-60 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
    Is that like a little tiny fullerene version of Mr. Bill?

    Oh no Mr. STM! Not that!
  3. Canada vs. Google by Mrs.+Grundy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Maybe as google is looking around for its next acquisition it should consider Canada. I'm sure the accountants could find synergy of some kind there.

    1. Re:Canada vs. Google by B3ryllium · · Score: 4, Funny

      Such an action would need to have the approval of Elizabeth the Second, by the Grace of God, of the United Kingdom, Canada and Her other Realms and Territories Queen, Head of the Commonwealth, Defender of the Faith.

    2. Re:Canada vs. Google by patio11 · · Score: 5, Funny
      When asked, Grace of God, of the United Kingdom, Canada and Her other Realms and Territories Queen, Head of the Commonwealth, Defender of the Faith, said of the matter: "Go for it, I've got no use for them anyway. All the worst parts of France and America with none of the food or guts that redeem them. I've been trying to pawn them off on another noble for thirty years but the only one who was interested was that grand-nephew six degrees removed from the Duke of Luxenbourg and he was far too decent of a chap to stick with them."

      Asked about the impending transfer of soverignty from her ex-Majesty to Google, Canada was rather disappointed but unwilling to cause a fuss. Quebec was outraged but plans to observe the traditional proprieties with a full surrender ceremony.

  4. Thats it....back in my day...! by ryg0r · · Score: 5, Funny
    I'm sick of all this crap. I'm gonna go back to how we old skoolers used to do it:

    Surfing random IP Addresses.

    For the ones that have decent content, I'll carve the number into my wooden desk.

    --
    Karma whoring .sigs don't work
    1. Re:Thats it....back in my day...! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Check out 127.0.0.1. Awesome porn collection.

    2. Re:Thats it....back in my day...! by The+New+Andy · · Score: 5, Funny

      Great, so now your desk is in violation of copyright law.

    3. Re:Thats it....back in my day...! by steelfood · · Score: 2, Funny

      How do you think I stumbled upon this?

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
  5. Google's Response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Did you mean: tyranny

  6. Re:That would be too stupid even for law makers by Dachannien · · Score: 1, Funny

    I'll eat my slashdot user number

    With a number as low as 355, all I can say is....

    "Less filling, tastes great!"

  7. I'm just waiting for someone to claim by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...the Canadian version of Google will be better and cheaper than the U.S. one, even if it takes several months to get a result.

  8. Politicians Don't Draft Bills by Vagary · · Score: 3, Funny

    Politicians don't draft bills, their staff does, and their staff is just an aggregator for lobbiests. So our representative democracies are really a distributed, collaborative, bill-authoring device. (ie: They could be replaced by a very small Wiki.)

    As for Bill C-60, I figure it's better if some lawyers make some $ than the government infringing on my fair use rights, so I'll write my MP and tell them to support it, then wait till the Supreme Court sorts out the mess.

  9. Re:Short and sweet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    And if Canada fell, we'd.. um... not have to listen to Celine Dion?

  10. Re:who cares? by Snocone · · Score: 2, Funny

    Just chill out and don't worry, Canada is not so stupid as to pass a bill that could possibly be as damaging as this.

    I am Canadian, you insensitive clod, and I'm bloody well TERRIFIED.

  11. Re:Why bother w/this then? by ComputerSlicer23 · · Score: 3, Funny
    You're just not very creative. I'm confident, you can pistol whip someone to death, without pulling the trigger...

    I've know of people who have had relative die by accidential discharge without anyone pulling the trigger. I'm not it's not unheard of while climbing over a fence to have some idiot lean a shotgun over. He'll jostle the fence, or the shotgun will get enough force applied to discharge the weapon without anyone pulling a trigger. It's one of the reasons you should always crack a shotgun open when you climb over a fence. I'm fairly sure, it's a good safty precaution to have it cracked all execpt when shooting if it's the style of shotgun you can do that with (breach loading, not a pump if I understand shotguns enough).

    Oh, for the record, I'm a big believer in an armed society is a polite society. Guns have their place, and having them be common in society isn't such a bad thing.

    Kirby

  12. Re:Short and sweet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Google has spell-check. He's golden!

  13. Random? by abb3w · · Score: 5, Funny
    For the ones that have decent content, I'll carve the number into my wooden desk.

    Check out 64.233.179.104 -- there's all sorts of neat stuff there. Better hurry before the cops shut it down.

    --
    //Information does not want to be free; it wants to breed.
  14. Take that, Canucks by typical · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'd like to say how smug and pleased I feel that, just this once, it isn't the United States with the new idiotic copyright law to push through -- that someone else is doing something stupid in the IP world that the US is doing right. Makes me feel downright patriotic. In the US, *we* don't hate archive.org and Google. So there!

    --
    Any program relying on (nontrivial) preemptive multithreading will be buggy.
    1. Re:Take that, Canucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      In the US, *we* don't hate archive.org and Google

      Yeah, we sue the things we don't hate in the US. It's like we're a country of sadists of something..

    2. Re:Take that, Canucks by xQx · · Score: 5, Funny

      Maybe it's part of some Free-Trade negotiations...

      America: No, You didn't support us in our silly War that we're still stuck in. We are going to Tariff you!
      Canada: How about we pass some silly laws so yours look less silly? you know, people are talking...
      America: Can you start a war with Albania for no reason so our voting public can be annoyed at you and forget about Iraq?
      Canada: Maybe... but lets just start with the silly laws.
      America: Okay, have a cigar.

  15. Run To America! Fear The Iron Fist of Canada ! by Shihar · · Score: 3, Funny

    This is almost like reverse 'US politicians are going to eat me syndrome' from the US where whenever a stupid bill is proposed a dozen posts pop up threatening to move to Canada.

    Breath.

    The bill has not been passed into law. The bill has been vaguely considered. The likely scenario is that some crotchety old bastard who doesn't even own a TV in the northern wastelands of Canada who was elected by his four neighbors, which live 100 miles away (giving him a solid 90% of the vote), was given a wet dream bill by a lobbyist going through the motions to receive his paycheck. Someone politician owns a computer a thousand blood thirsty lobbyist representing any industry hurt by said bill are going to descend upon the capital and decry the bill as the music industries attempt to trying to eat Google, libraries, and small children. The liberals are going to recoil in disgust at the realization that bill might help the music industry, and the conservatives with a hard on for Google or some other corporation will promptly decry the bill as undue government interference. It will then be completely lobotomized and be reworded to either say, "It is illegal to provide copywrite information location tools powered by babies pulled from their mother's wombs" or turned into a poison pill of a bill and be reworded to say, "Canada will construct a tower of dead babies from which the music industry can lord over the small people of Canada as Gods".

    Whatever version they pick it will be written in both French and English.

    Both sides will make long winded speeches that has nothing to do with the law being discussed. These speeches will get chopped up and put into campaign literature.

    The campaign literature will also be in both French and English.

    It will be a unanimous voted on either way, either against making a tower of dead babies or for making it illegal to run a device powered by dead babies. Whatever the case, at the end of the day, the political system will defeat this bill in its own kludgy and ham-fisted way.

    So breath, no one has to move to the US to escape the iron fist of the Canadian government.

  16. Funny... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I've always found people in Texas fairly rude, although not as rude as the general populace in Florida. Perhaps I only encountered the unarmed citizens in either. :roll eyes:

  17. Blame Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Sheila: Times have changed
    Our kids are getting worse
    They won't obey their parents
    They just want to fart and curse!
    Sharon: Should we blame the government?
    Liane: Or blame society?
    Dads: Or should we blame the images on TV?
    Sheila: No, blame Canada
    Everyone: Blame Canada
    Sheila: With all their beady little eyes
    And flappin' heads so full of lies
    Everyone: Blame Canada
    Blame Canada
    Sheila: We need to form a full assault
    Everyone: It's Canada's fault!
    Sharon: Don't blame me
    For my son Stan
    He saw the darn cartoon
    And now he's off to join the Klan!
    Liane: And my boy Eric once
    Had my picture on his shelf
    But now when I see him he tells me to fuck myself!
    Sheila: Well, blame Canada
    Everyone: Blame Canada
    Sheila: It seems that everything's gone wrong
    Since Canada came along
    Everyone: Blame Canada
    Blame Canada
    Copy Guy: They're not even a real country anyway
    Ms. McCormick: My son could've been a doctor or a lawyer, it's a-true
    Instead he burned up like a piggy on a barbecue
    Everyone: Should we blame the matches?
    Should we blame the fire?
    Or the doctors who allowed him to expire?
    Sheila: Heck no!
    Everyone: Blame Canada
    Blame Canada
    Sheila: With all their hockey hullabaloo
    Liane: And that bitch Anne Murray too
    Everyone: Blame Canada
    Shame on Canada
    Ohhh...
    The smut we must stop
    The trash we must bash
    Laughter and fun
    Must all be undone
    We must blame them and cause a fuss
    Before somebody thinks of blaming uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuus

  18. Wouldn't this also apply to phonebooks, maps, .... by ralatalo · · Score: 2, Funny

    and Tvguide, and tourist guides, and news paper classified.... also... the card catalog in the libraries.... oh... let's start the book burnings now...