Slashdot Mirror


New Way to Make Hydrogen

zymano writes "Hydrogen is expensive to make and difficult to store. The most common way in making hydrogen is electrolyzing pure water. A new startup is trying a new way to make hydrogen. The process uses sodium which industry shuns because it generates sparks and heat when mixed with water. Signa has devised a way to mix sodium with silica gel or crystalline silicon to create a powder that essentially strips electrons from the sodium molecules in advance and stores them. When water is introduced, the chemical reaction proceeds calmly. The powder generates hydrogen efficiently. More than 9 percent of a kilogram of the powder gets converted to hydrogen and little energy is lost through heat."

16 of 591 comments (clear)

  1. The stench that launched a thousand cars by nizo · · Score: 4, Funny
    Thus spake the article:

    Michael Lefenfeld and James Dye of Signa Chemistry wanted to make rooms smell better. Instead, they stumbled on a way that could make hydrogen fuel cells a practical reality.

    Who wants to bet that Michael and James have a room full of stinky unshowered nerds to thank for stumbling onto this innovation?

    1. Re:The stench that launched a thousand cars by boisepunk · · Score: 4, Funny

      Did the scientists that they worked for not get invited to "those kind of parties"?

      --------
      42

      --
      main(0)
  2. They're not making Hydrogen by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1, Funny

    They're not making hydrogen. They're just gathering the stuff that was formed at the start of the universe (or created by God if you're a dumb creationist).

    --
    Evil people are out to get you.
    1. Re:They're not making Hydrogen by cperciva · · Score: 2, Funny

      They're not making hydrogen.

      Yes they are... they're taking a bunch of protons and putting them together with a bunch of electrons.

      They're just gathering the stuff that was formed at the start of the universe

      There wasn't any hydrogen in the early universe; it didn't form until about half a million years later, once the temperature of the universe had dropped to around 3000K.

  3. Ahem. by copponex · · Score: 2, Funny

    "...if you're a dumb creationist."

    You've repeated yourself.

  4. Re:Fossil Fuels... by NarrMaster · · Score: 5, Funny

    Well, you combine it with oxygen to form water, and then ship it through a pipeline.... oh, nevermind...

    --
    That's right. All your base.
  5. Finally by hobotron · · Score: 5, Funny


    A use for all those "WARNING DO NOT EAT ME" packets.

    --
    There is truth in humor.
    1. Re:Finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      ...other than giving them away at Halloween.

  6. Re:Converted to hydrogen? by openpoop · · Score: 5, Funny

    if i only had some mod points... you have, good sir, embiggened us all with your cromulent analysis.

  7. What about the chlorine? by Timbotronic · · Score: 3, Funny

    IIRC pure sodium is generally extracted from molten salt by electrolysis. So that means not only do you have to expend a huge amount of energy to get your sodium, you're also producing toxic, ozone destroying chlorine gas as a byproduct. Oh well, at least they can say it's GREEN!

    --

    One of these days I'm moving to Theory - everything works there

  8. Why MAKE Hydrogen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Why do we need to make hydrogen? There's TONS of it sitting right out in the open, ripe for the taking!

    My fellow slashdotters, what we need only to do is MINE THE SUN!

    All we need is a space shuttle, and a team of roughneck oil workers. With a bit of training they will be SPACE MINERS, and we can send them on their merry way into the sun to mine it for us!

    1. Re:Why MAKE Hydrogen? by Scarblac · · Score: 5, Funny

      (obligatory)

      And for all those naysayers who claim it can't be done because the sun is too hot - we'd only mine the sun AT NIGHT!

      --
      I believe posters are recognized by their sig. So I made one.
    2. Re:Why MAKE Hydrogen? by VirtualAdept · · Score: 1, Funny
      My god, NO! You fool, how could you be so alarmingly stupid?!

      ...

      After all, if we send our roughneck oil workers to the sun, who is going to save us from the asteroids? :>-

  9. Hydrogen by pedicabo · · Score: 1, Funny

    Hydrogen is not difficult to store. All you do is combine it with oxygen and it turns into water. Here on this planet, we have been so successful that we have oceans of the stuff just lying around. You'll see it when you get here.

  10. Re:Mind bogglingly stupid by Idarubicin · · Score: 2, Funny
    BTW there is an existing technology for producing "safe" sodium involving mixing it with mercury to form amalgam. This has been around for many years (it is the basis of early plants for producing sodium hydroxide from salt.) It has not revolutionised fuel cells or led to a practical mobile phone fuel cell. So explain why this should be any different?

    This must be some novel use of the word "safe" I'm not familiar with....

    Scientist 1: So we'd like to use sodium as part of our fuel, but it's dangerously reactive.
    Scientist 2: I know! Let's add a neurotoxic metal to it in large quantities. I'm sure the EPA won't mind.
    Maybe it didn't catch on because mercury is expensive to store, manipulate, and dispose of? How is your local public works department going to feel about mercury-sodium amalgam entering the waste stream?
    --
    ~Idarubicin
  11. Re:Hydrogen is a red herring by zippthorne · · Score: 4, Funny

    Two words: hydrogen embrittlement.

    It turns out that one of the most useful ways to store and transport hydrogen is by chemically bonding it in long chain carbon molecules. The resulting liquid has a high energy density (per volume) and is relatively easy to store.

    --
    Can you be Even More Awesome?!