Slashdot Mirror


Online TV May Be IPTV's First Step

An anonymous reader writes "According to the San Diego Union Tribune Time Warner Cable is letting its customers in San Diego watch live television over their hi-speed internet PCs via 'Online TV'. Time Warner's Broadband TV service (no cost above the min system requirement of cable and hi-speed modem) offers the identical '80 channels that are available with its standard cable TV service.' According to Judy Walsh, Time Warner's San Diego division president, 'It's basically like having another outlet for watching TV. It's TV on your PC. It's that simple.' Is this really the first step towards full-fledged IPTV or is this a service for dad's who can't wrestle the remote control from their kids?"

5 of 217 comments (clear)

  1. groovy by zxnos · · Score: 3, Insightful

    if it goes national- instant, precise ratings.

    --
    always mosh clockwise
  2. Re:What is the point or purpose of IPTV? by dsginter · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What is the point or purpose of IPTV?

    A practical purpose of IPTV is to allow content from anywhere and anyone - not just Big Business. Now, Time Warner is doing this only to prevent such a thing from happening.

    Take, Strong Bad, for example. I would easily pay like $5/year to watch this creativity a couple times per month. What happens if 30 million others feel the same way? Instant negation of Big Business, that is what.

    Time Warner, Comcast, NBC, CBS, Fox and all those others need to be first here or they will be gone in short time.

    --
    More
  3. Re:What is the point or purpose of IPTV? by overshoot · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Can someone enlighten me why IPTV matters?

    IPTV forever frees the broadcasters from the shackles of fair use: with Microsoft's help, they can dictate whatever terms they like for viewing.

    IPTV also frees the system manfacturers from the shackles of competing with an installed base: at any time, they can declare your particular display, computer, hard drive, etc. to be noncompliant and the system will stop working until you upgrade.

    Between these two, it's a Brave New World for two business sectors which were facing market saturation and declining revenues.

    --
    Lacking <sarcasm> tags, /. substitutes moderation as "Troll."
  4. Re:57 channels and nothing on ... by AtariAmarok · · Score: 4, Insightful
    "No matter which pipe delivers it, TV is still the intellectual equivalent of raw sewage"

    The same is true of books and everything else. Television is subject to Sturgeon's Law no more and no less than everything else. The "smash your television!" mentality is dangerous close to the book-burner's mentality.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  5. Re:What is the point or purpose of IPTV? by Woogiemonger · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Take, Strong Bad, for example. I would easily pay like $5/year to watch this creativity a couple times per month. What happens if 30 million others feel the same way? Instant negation of Big Business, that is what.

    Millions of people can make their own CDs, but we haven't seen the major record labels "negated" yet. With TV, the major studios are the ones who can supply the cash and resources for sets, special effects, big name actors, etc etc. Although I can imagine there will be a lot more cult followings of low-budget TV shows and the big TV networks will have less control, they'll not have to worry about instant negation. Strong Bad will be bought and whored out like nobody's business long before any one goes out of business.