Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Battlestar Galactica Season 2 Premiere

Posted by ryuzaki0 on from the watch-for-cylons dept.

fanblade writes "As if slashdotters needed another reason to stay home on a Friday night, the 20-episode second season of Battlestar Galactica premieres tonight at 10/9C on the Sci Fi Channel. The series, a 're-imagining' of the original 1978 TV series by the same name, made history as the highest-rated original Sci Fi Channel program ever. The first episode of the second season, 'Scattered', won't be televised in the UK until October, but I seriously doubt that will be a problem for the show that 'killed broadcast TV'. There's also excellent coverage on Wikipedia for those eager to brush up or catch up on the first season."

6 of 492 comments (clear)

  1. Nothing new under the sun... by Skyshadow · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Did you hear that Shakeswhatever fellow is remaking the "Tragicall Historye of Romeus and Juliet"? And that was already a remake of "Mariotto and Gianozza", fer chrissake.

    I wish these London playhouses would spend enough resources to bring in some truly creative people and get some new ideas rather than just rehashing the same old stories over and over and over again. I mean, really, how many more beatings can this dead horse really take?

    --
    Every year during my review, I just pray the words "slashdot.org" aren't mentioned.
  2. Tape Atlantis, so you can skip the bad parts by FirstNoel · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Atlantis is much better if you don't have to sit through all the dreadful acting. You can usually cut out half a show or more and still get the general idea of what happened.

    I'm waiting till about season 3, if the crew hasn't gelled by then it will be off my list completely.

    Sean

    --
    "Hmm. I am to metaphor cheese as metaphor cheese is to transitive verb crackers!"
  3. Re:The classics preventing innovation? by Wubby · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I generally agree your point about rehashing old shows into todays fodder, and not just scifi. Movies can't seem to come up with anything new either.

    BUT (huge but)

    This show is the exception. After watching this, seeing the old show would be like watching a disney version of "A Clockwork Orange". The new BSG is so much more than the old show. I'm sorry, Glen Larsen had great ideas, but the production never lived up. This is how the show should have been done from the beginning! Dramatic, epic, lots of intrigue and suspense.

    And I don't think Dr. Who is a remake. More of a continuation. There have been, like, a bajillion of those guys. I think the BBC just took it out of mothballs and brushed it off. Kinda like what "Enterprise" was to "Star Trek".

    --
    Sig
    Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars
  4. Re:The classics preventing innovation? by JWW · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Kinda like what "Enterprise" was to "Star Trek".

    Yeah, except Dr. Who doesn't suck.

  5. The Weapons are realistic by dmh20002 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    One thing I really like about BSG is that the weapons are realistic and the visual effects are outstanding. The missile salvos are really really cool. Unlike Star Trek, Star Wars and SG-1, the BSG folks use guided weapons. In those other shows, in the future, the engineers have forgotten how to make guided or tracking weapons. They just shoot stuff randomly and most of the time they miss. The Stargate Atlantis finale from last season was a prime example. The marines show up with 'rail guns' that they are so fracking proud of. But then they just spray out into space with no radar tracking or anything else, hitting nothing. Jesus, a 20th century Phalanx is way better than the crap they have.

    Oh, Babylon 5 was one of the few good ones also. The way they tracked the beam weapons and sliced things up was believable and cool.

  6. Re:Also Stargate SG1 & Atlantis! by hazem · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Well, you have to remember, this is a fleet of whatever ships that happened to survive, with a flagship that was about to be retired. Equipment for water processing is somewhat a limited resource - note how many of the ships relied on Galactica for water replenishment.

    So, sure, water in some form is abundant in space/planets, etc. But they need water "now", and probably dont' have facilities to collect hydrogen/oxygen to make water, or to do a "moisture vaporator thing" - they had to support some 45,000 people - they had to get it fast, and worry about being caught by cylons on top of all that.

    Hell... the colonel was upset that the water they found was salty - aparently they couldn't deal with even that.

    So now you're on a search for potable water - and that has to be much more rare than water in any form. And it has to be in large quantities - and somewhat accessible in a quick manner.

    I mean, imagine you're just 100 people, crashed in eastern Afghanistan, and you're being hunted by Taliban. Oh yeah, and you don't have enough water to get anywhere. So, sure, you could set up all kinds of ways to collect water - even in an erid environment. But, few of those will lend themselves well to being on the run and resource-poor.

    It's really not that much of a stretch.