Slashdot Mirror


Distributed Versus Centralized DB?

OSXCPA asks: "I am developing a framework for processing accounting information. What kinds of advice would you have for setting up an environment where several (eventually, many) remote data aggregation and processing centers would update a central server 'after hours' to avoid processing delays. For those with ERP experience, I am trying to process transactions locally, instead of generating a batch in the central server, then update and validate the result to the central server, so my remote users can process at full speed all day, and central DB can get caught up later. Remote locations are all self-contained, in that no one will be posting transactions to another remote location. No big iron - this is all networked PC/Mac hardware and a central server (eventually to be a server farm, as needed). Feedback or constructive criticism would be appreciated. Technical advice is great, but I'm also looking for stuff like 'Gee, if I had only known XXX when I set this up, I would have done YYY...'"

1 of 47 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Run away while you still have your sanity. ;) by unitron · · Score: 2, Funny
    "...none of that stuff ever worked as well as the vendors said it would, and it all required a lot more work on the DBA's part (and typically lots more $$$ in general) than it was supposed to."

    So in other words it's a lot like any other kind of software you buy?

    --

    I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.