Slashdot Mirror


Atom 1.0 vs RSS 2.0

heeeraldo writes "Is there another format war on the horizon? This wiki compares the two, and finds that even though RSS has far greater deployment (and mindshare), Atom 1.0 solves a lot of the problems associated with it."

3 of 198 comments (clear)

  1. Re:No question by Antity-H · · Score: 4, Interesting

    And Google is throwing its weight behin atom (at least in gmail) so who knows ?

  2. One thing by Apreche · · Score: 5, Interesting

    One thing that really bothers me about RSS, no matter how much I like it, is how every site uses it differently. I was writing a simple aggregation program and using php/magpierss. Every single site puts the date and time of the items in a different tag. Some use datetime, some use pubdate, some use dc->date and some don't put the date! Seriously, no matter the standard it wont help if not everyone uses it fully and properly.

    --
    The GeekNights podcast is going strong. Listen!
  3. Re:We use it! by TheRaven64 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Slashdot has the most broken RSS feed ever invented. You get banned for 72 hours if you access it more than once every 30 minutes. Not really a problem, except that Slashcode is braindead at identifying individuals. Two computers behind a NAT are treated as the same person, for example. Worse, my ISP uses a transparent proxy for everyone in my city (most people here with broadband use my ISP, since their cable service is a lot cheaper than competing ADSL suppliers). Does Slashdot recognise this? No, they block the transparent proxy whenever more than one person using it accesses the site within a 30 minute period. Clever, huh? The result is that the Slashdot feed is always blocked for me at home.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News