Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Sun Firms Up Its Sparc Chip Plans

Posted by timothy on from the high-grade-vapor dept.

delirium of disorder writes "Despite their recent focus on Opteron-based servers, Sun has not given up on SPARC. Niagara , the latest development in the SPARC line, will have 8 cores and according to this article will consume about 56 watts and have performance comparable to a four-way SMP Xeon system. New Xeons will consume hundreds of watts per processor."

2 of 9 comments (clear)

  1. SPARC has always been by VolciMaster · · Score: 2, Interesting
    a really well-designed architecture. I haven't had much cahnce to futz with it due to cost of the equipment, but the chips are erally powerful. Loads of cache, lots and lots of registers, few instructions (God bless RISC), and a really wide data path. I hope this can spark some new life into the company.

    Sun's huge investment into Java and Solaris hasn't thrilled me (I personally haven't really found Java all that interesting), and I prefer to use Linux, though their recent Open Solaris project does look interesting. Maybe if they'd focused more on hardware they wouldn't have needed to use the Opterons in as a large a role as they have. The Opteron (an AMD64 in general) is a nice architecture, getting the benefits of really wide data paths and decent amounts of cache, but is still stuck with not many GPRs and that pesky x86 compatibility. Being able to run old software natively instead of through some kludge of a compatibility layer (Itanium) is a Good Thing (tm) when it comes to getting people to move to your hardware, however, I hope AMD has the decency to kill of x86 in a couple years, once 'everybody' has made the switch.

    I'm looking forward to seeing this new SPARC in the real world, to see how it stacks up against other CPUs.

    --
    antipaucity
  2. 8 cores...ouch by vdthemyk · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Ok, so an 8 core processor to function at the level of a 4 way xeon processor. Hmmm, I'm sure Oracle users will be sure to run their apps on this architecture!

    So, instead of paying $80k in licensing, they can pay $160k! (at about $20k per core for Enterprise Oracle DB).

    With most enterprise level apps going to a per core licensing structure (and if per user, they usually limit that to 4 cores to a system), I don't see the benefit in having a really powerful and possibly expensive http server.

    --
    VD