Slashdot Mirror


One Step Away from Changing Daylight Savings Time

An anonymous reader writes "Congressional leaders from both parties have signed off on a proposal that will change daylight savings time in the United States as early as this year. All that is left is a signoff by President Bush. If the proposed solution becomes law, DST will be extended two months, from March to November. With many IT applications relying on accurate time information and many having automatic adjustments for DST, how will the IT world handle this change? And with the proposal reportedly taking effect this year, is there enough time to implement change?"

35 of 898 comments (clear)

  1. My own preference by ZoneGray · · Score: 5, Funny

    What I'd prefer is that they passed a law making the hours between 9:00 am and 5:00 pm shorter.

    1. Re:My own preference by snorklewacker · · Score: 4, Funny

      I work nights, you insensitive clod!

      --
      I am no longer wasting my time with slashdot
  2. They should do away with 24-hour clock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    US should reaffirm its innovation and move out of the old systems, like the metric one. They should break up the day into 100 hours instead of stupid 24. Potential benefits:

    - Easier to calculate amount of hours worked.
    - Working 9 to 5 becomes a breeze.
    - With minimum wage tied up to the hour everyone could be rich and retire early.

    1. Re:They should do away with 24-hour clock by generic-man · · Score: 4, Funny

      They should break up the day into 100 hours instead of stupid 24. Potential benefits:
      - Working 9 to 5 becomes a breeze.


      Are you insane? With a 100 hour day, working "9 to 5" becomes a 96-hour day, equivalent to 23.04 of your Classic American Non-Metric Hours. That's no good.

      --
      For more information, click here.
  3. Answers by DanThe1Man · · Score: 5, Funny

    Badly. No.

    Score yourself at home. How did you do?

  4. Re:This is spectacular by ottergoose · · Score: 4, Funny

    Next thing you know Bush will make us use a calandar based on how many days it has been since Jesus died. That would be absurd.

  5. usa by sewagemaster · · Score: 1, Funny

    since this is a US thing, will the change affect canada as well? (ok, before BC and Ontario become part of the US while Quebec splits off from the rest of Canada? ;)

  6. WAHOOO!!!! by QuasiEvil · · Score: 1, Funny

    Yeah, here goes my karma. Oh well.

    WAAAAHHOOOOO!!!! I'm not a morning person, so I don't give a crap if it gets light earlier. I'd rather have more light after work, when I'm actually awake and productive...

    Non-morning people unite and rejoice!

  7. This could be a Hallmark event by nizo · · Score: 5, Funny

    This isn't a problem; simply get Hallmark to create yet another holiday. Something catchy like, "Don't burn your house down" day to help people remember to change their batteries (maybe even with a pocket to hold replacement batteries).

    1. Re:This could be a Hallmark event by robertjw · · Score: 4, Funny

      Something catchy like, "Don't burn your house down" day to help people remember to change their batteries

      Good idea, except we will need two holidays, one for spring and one for fall. We should name them something similar so people will never remember which is which (like memorial day and labor day). Maybe "Don't burn your house down" day in the spring and "Save your life" day in the fall.

    2. Re:This could be a Hallmark event by Martin+Blank · · Score: 3, Funny

      That's a Commie holiday. We don't support Commie holidays here in the US.

      Commie.

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
    3. Re:This could be a Hallmark event by KylePflug · · Score: 3, Funny

      I have an even better idea. We'll call it "Every six months day". It will happen every six months. You'll know when it's that day again because that's the day you change your fire alarm batteries.

    4. Re:This could be a Hallmark event by WindBourne · · Score: 3, Funny

      If you think that we speak English in the USA, then you obviously have not been here (nor did you capitalize the English). We speak something, but these days, I do not think it is English. Just listen to GWB.

      YOU must be the terrorist leader( or if you are older, then you are a commie pinko ).

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    5. Re:This could be a Hallmark event by The+Snowman · · Score: 4, Funny

      That's a Commie holiday. We don't support Commie holidays here in the US.

      No, we "celebrate" Labor Day by forcing our blue collar workers to their jobs to run the retail stores while everyone else enjoys sales, promotions, and extended shopping hours.

      Celebrate Labor Day by working! Amazing!

      --
      24 beers in a case, 24 hours in a day. Coincidence? I think not!
    6. Re:This could be a Hallmark event by aidfarh · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually, I've always felt the other way around. I find it ironic that we celebrate Labour Day by having a holiday. I mean, fathers don't celebrate Fathers Day by stopping being fathers, mothers don't celebrate Mothers Day by stopping being mothers, nurses don't celebrate Nurses Day by stopping being nurses, etc., so why are labourers celebrating Labour Day by not doing any labour? In fact, we should celebrate Labour Day by doing more labour, to really celebrate the concept of labouring.

      --
      There is no sig.
    7. Re:This could be a Hallmark event by MemoryAid · · Score: 2, Funny
      Congress would better serve us by providing incentives to battery manufacturers to create batteries that could reliably detect smoke for a whole year.

      Why do we need daylight saving time at all? Because congress is already in bed with those same battery manufacturers, who want us to buy twice as many batteries as we really need. Follow the money... but you already know where it leads, don't you.

      --
      Language students: Don't try to learn English here. This ain't it.
    8. Re:This could be a Hallmark event by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      ... but people will be too wasted...

  8. Re:Billing rates are going up!!!! by sewagemaster · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's Y2K all over again. :)
    Hopefully the consulting companies will be able to sell the scare and raise the billing rates!
    Jobs!!!! Jobs!!!!


    This is like rediscoving your erection again. In the beginning there were no problems having one. Then it disappeared, seemingly for good. And suddenly it all came back like saussages at a hotdog stand!

  9. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by eln · · Score: 5, Funny

    The biggest problem with this change is that Daylight Savings Time will now last much longer than Standard Time. Since it would then be DST most of the time, Daylight Savings Time should be renamed "Standard Time." Of course, that leaves the problem with what to call the old "Standard Time." My suggestions are as follows:

    - Daylight Wasting Time
    - Congress Has Too Much Time on Their Hands Time

  10. Re:I know how I'll handle it... by F452 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now if there were only a way to automagically delete all occurrences of the word "automagically." What are you: Unfrozen Caveman Lawyer? Does our world frighten and confuse you? Your cell phone updates from the network because of software. There aren't little demons in there doing it.

  11. Re:Fix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    hahaha, whoever the idiot is that marked this redundant should have the dunce cap put on.

  12. They should change the names, too. by Robotech_Master · · Score: 3, Funny

    If we're going to be in Daylight Savings Time 9 months out of the year, they should call Daylight Savings Time "Standard" time, instead, and change Standard Time to "Daylight Wasting Time" (DWT).

    --
    Editor Emeritus and Senior Writer, TeleRead.org
  13. No DST worked for me! by Dr.+Transparent · · Score: 3, Funny

    Blessed AZ. Giving the finger to you time switchers the world over.

    I agree no DST is awesome.

  14. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by darkonc · · Score: 2, Funny

    Real simple.. We'll have Daylight Savings Time, and Daylight Standard time. That way we don't have to keep changing the abbreviation all the time.. Here on the West coast it'll just be "PST" all year 'round.
    (Patent Pending)

    --
    Sometimes boldness is in fashion. Sometimes only the brave will be bold.
  15. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by someonewhois · · Score: 2, Funny

    I dunno. "What time zone are you in? I'm in GMT." "Oh, I'm in CHTMTOTHT. :)". Sounds kind of akward, eh?

  16. Re:Billing rates are going up!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    How about we have our 'puters set for GMT?
    Another idea is to set your systems time to UTC.

  17. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by b!arg · · Score: 2, Funny

    That's a good idea too...I just usually burn something in the oven or on the stovetop. This gives me a weekly check of my smoke detector! No once can say I'm not doing my part for fire prevention!

    --

    Everybody dies frustrated and sad and that is beautiful
  18. Re:This is spectacular by l810c · · Score: 4, Funny
    That would set us back decades.

    It would be the 1970's all over again

  19. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by deathy_epl+ccs · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yeah, but EVERYONE uses France for that predictable knee-jerk response...

  20. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by outsider007 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I would like as an add-on to the bill, a proposal for 13 O'clock to be added to the clock, that way we could all get an extra hour of sleep.

    --
    If you mod me down the terrorists will have won
  21. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by omeomi · · Score: 4, Funny

    Daylight Savings Time should be renamed "Standard Time." Of course, that leaves the problem with what to call the old "Standard Time." My suggestions are as follows:

    We'll just call it "Standard Time Full Speed" and "Standard Time Hi-Speed"...that'll solve the confusion.

  22. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by zippthorne · · Score: 2, Funny

    There's a queen of canada? Or do you just take the Queen of England and call her the Queen of Canada (kind of like prince charles is Prince of Wales.. shouldn't he be prince of England if his mum is the queen?)

    The only titles of nobility I recognize are Helium, Neon, Argon, Krypton, Xenon and Radon. And I don't count Radon since it's only temporary.

    --
    Can you be Even More Awesome?!
  23. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by hunterx11 · · Score: 2, Funny
    can you imagine the confusion if we didn't follow?

    We Americans are more concerned by the confusion caused by your 20 hour day than a slight adjustment such as daylight savings time.

    --
    English is easier said than done.
  24. Re:This is spectacular by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    And that would give Bush to re-live those glory days in the Guard.

  25. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by Atryn · · Score: 2, Funny
    The Queen of England is also the Queen of Canada, she is also the Queen of Australia and the Queen of New Zealand, just to name a few more.
    Mayeb ya'll should consider a revolution? I know, it was so last millenium, but you could get another holiday out of it...
    --
    Come play Moral Decay!