Microsoft Continues Anti-OSS Strategy
MacDaffy writes "Microsoft's General Manager of Platform Strategy, Michael Taylor, continues Microsoft's press blitz against Open Source in general and Linux in particular in a CNET Interview. He says of Linux: 'You can build it, design it, and it will work great. The trouble begins when you want to add things to it...(due to) the brittle nature of the platform, when you do that, other things break.'"
... in Windows, you don't have to add things to break it!
As where with windows. It comes broken.
+-+-+-The folowing statement is true. The previous statement is false.-+-+-+
'You can build it, design it, and it will work great. The trouble begins when you want to add things to it...(due to) the brittle nature of the platform, when you do that, other things break.'
We heard what the thinks about Windows, but what does he say about linux?
+1 funny, -2 overrated. Life isn't fair.
Why would you post such an article on Slashdot?!?
*Runs for nearest bomb shelter*
Upcoming article: Why Microsoft is the greatest!
His comments make me want to hunt him down and whack him over the head with my copy of "programing windows with MFC."
Taylor: We continue to do the same things that we've been doing in the last couple of years
You mean perpetually patch IE security flaws?
...when you have only one "Blue Screen" to help solve your problem.
http://www.michel.eti.br
"...because people didn't really understand buffer overruns and port 80 and I/O issues 10 years ago...
Those damn port 80 and I/O issues. Such a bitch to fix.
When you add stuff to a Linux box, Microsoft's business model breaks.
Microsoft: Which cleaners would you like to be taken to today?
I know you were trying to be funny, but this is FUD. I have been running 2000 on many of my servers for a year now and it's never broken. Windows NT and 98, on the other hand, are a different story. Windows 2000 is actually very stable.
Before 2000:
I know you were trying to be funny, but this is FUD. I have been running NT 4.0 on many of my servers for a year now and it's never broken. Windows NT 3.51 and 95, on the other hand, are a different story. Windows Nt 4.0 is actually very stable. and so on..
In case of install, break Windows.
In case of using IE, break Windows.
In case of using Outlook Express, break windows.
In case of buying a new graphics card, break windows.
In case of using it for a couple months, break windows.
Heh.. the title of the article should have been: "Microsoft Continues Anti-OS Strategy"
There are 10 types of people in this world, those who can count in binary and those who can't.
This article is ridiculous flamebait. Anyone who is a Decision Maker, recognizes the usefullness of both Operating Systems.
Wishful thinking. If Decision Makers were so enlightened, why are there bad decisions?
Anticipated-Comment Summary for the Casual Slashdot Reader
I've been programming for 18 years and just got into a PhD program in CS, and I still can't reliably get a wifi card to behave under Linux.
Well, I'll bet you would have had no trouble with
what wifi card before you got into the PhD
program.
By the time you finish, you will be unable to determine for certain whether something is or
is not a computer.