Slashdot Mirror


Firefox 1.1 Scrapped

An Anonymous Reader writes: "The Firefox team has decided to scrap the planned 1.1 release (already in Alpha 2) and instead release the final version as 1.5 due to the significant number of bug fixes and changes. The 1.5 feature complete beta is expected next month." From the article: "We are planning for a Firefox 2.0 and 3.0, but will divide the planned work over (at this point) three major Milestones, 1.5 (September 2005), 2.0 (unscheduled) and 3.0 (unscheduled). All major development work will be done on the Mozilla trunk, and these releases will coincide with Gecko version revs."

3 of 482 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Can you read this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    wouldn't it be better to get some glasses than to complain to the developers that you have bad eye sight?

  2. Reccomendations for FF by Khyber · · Score: 0, Troll

    I'd like to point out that many of the problems now found with FireFox came about when smart script kiddies and coders found out that Java is a useful way to screw up someone's computer. Same thing with Flash.

    My recommendation for the Mozilla development team is to include the support for Java and Flash within their program, BUT disable it by default, and force users to enable it when they want to. I know this sounds screwed up, but to many degrees this wil make FireFox even safer, as most users are unaware that FireFox can potentially be just as vulnerable.

    One of the people I do side work for called me a couple of weeks ago, and told me she was having problems with FF. I went over to her place, and found out she had gone past my disabling Java and installing FlashBlock. She removed Flashblock (having played many flash games and gotten addicted to them) and her gmail wouldn't function the way she wanted it to with Java disabled. Of course, needless to say, she visited some site that installed some stuff thru Firefox thanks to Java. She was riddled with worms and trojans. It was so bad i had to wipe her computer clean, to her chagrin. I told her "If you try to work around my own security measures that I implement on my own system to keep my system secure, you're bound to run into problems." It took about ten hours of explaining to her and demonstrating on her laptop (boy, she hated that) how Java can screw her system up, as well as Flash. It took me less than ten minutes to use flash to riddle the laptop with spyware. She's learned her lesson (after wiping out both her harddrives) and now she won't dare get around any security I implement.

    The trick here, is to educate people on what's real and what's not. Sitting around doing nothing about it but griping is not going to help, it's only going to exacerbate the problem. People need to constantly and continually educate those with less knowledge, otherwise we're going to trap ourselves into allowing the uneducated masses make the bigger decisions for us.

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  3. The version doesn't matter when... by OpenSoresTroll · · Score: -1, Troll
    Like most open sores projects, Firefox may have some technical superiorities, but for the majority of users (currently almost 90% in the case of Firefox), there is absolutely no need to subject themselves to the difficulties of downloading and installing a new browser when it's very easy to continue using IE. What's that you say? Security updates? Also very easy. I just click on Windows Update and it installs all the patches for me lickety-split. If I need security patches for Firefox, I have to re-download and re-install the whole frickin' thing! Ludicrous!

    Remind me again why I would ever want to fiddle around with this Firefox thing? Why is it that Firefox loads slower than IE and uses more memory while it's running? I thought it was lean and fast? Doesn't look that way to me. Why is it that some web sites don't look right with Firefox? Tabbed browsing? Who cares? It just takes up space that could be used to display a web page and has no other benefits that we have been able to easily determine so far.

    All the hype around 1.0 and the newspaper ad and getfirefox.com stirred up too much interest too quickly. Now 10% of Internet users are using a flawed and inferior FF that fails to live up to most of its promises, and that is either going to put a major damper on the widespread adoption of any future version or the marketing efforts are going to have to be enormous for the next release and somebody's going to have to say "Well we realize the last one sucked but we've fixed our mistakes." Who is "we" anyway? I say the Mozilla folks have so far failed to produce a superior product. Maybe they should look outside of the former Netscape intern, over-eager Stanford student with rich parents crowd for developers, or maybe professional management would help.

    With Much Love,
    OpenSoresTroll