Slashdot Mirror


New Study Finds VOIP is Getting Better

Proudrooster writes "Keynote Systems Inc. made 154,000 VOIP calls during the months of May and June. In total they tested six VOIP providers and seven ISPs. Their conclusion was that VOIP isn't quite as robust as the public phone network due to dropped calls, lower audio quality, and latency (audio delay), but it is still pretty good. The worst VOIP provider had an availability of 94.8% (which isn't bad) and overall the reviewers were pleasantly surprised with the VOIP test results. Vonage ranked best for "most reliable" with 99.4% uptime, AT&T CallVantage ranked best for "audio clarity"." Personally I think 94.8% is pretty awful. I don't think 99.4% is very good either. But there is no doubt that audio quality is getting better. I only maintain my land line now for my HD Tivo to dial out from.

19 of 376 comments (clear)

  1. Take heed by bigwavejas · · Score: 5, Insightful
    The worst VOIP provider had an availability of 94.8% (which isn't bad)

    I disagree entirely! When someone's life may depend on a call going through (911) I would say anything below 99.99 (repeating) is unacceptable.

    In addition...
    There is another problem with using VOIP. When the internet goes down your VOIP phone may go with it. We use VOIP phones at work and I recall a situation last year where a hacker brought our internet connection to its knees (hence no VOIP phones) and everyone was running around like a chicken with their head cut off trying to figure out how to make calls. Our solution was to use cell phones for back-up, but I couldn't help but point out if we had regular phones we would have avoided the problem entirely.

    --
    "Simplify, simplify, simplify!" Thoreau
    1. Re:Take heed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You shouldn't use VOIP for 911 calls. It's not designed for that. Use VoIP for cheap, not for critical. Don't use the wrong sollution and then blame the technology.

    2. Re:Take heed by pyrrhonist · · Score: 2, Insightful
      When the power went out in the northeast of the US a year or two ago...

      ...but anyone can head to a drug store in a major power outage and buy a $10 AT&T corded phone if they don't already have one.

      I went to CVS on the day that happened. The power wasn't out in our area, but was out in much of the northeast. The funny part was that CVS couldn't sell anything, because the connection from their registers to their datacenter was down. Thus, I was unable to purchase a phone (or a Coke, actually).

      --
      Show me on the doll where his noodly appendage touched you.
    3. Re:Take heed by bedroll · · Score: 2, Insightful
      When the power went out in the northeast of the US a year or two ago, VoIP was toast. And that's exactly the sort of time you don't want your phone going down.

      Sure, but Verizon Wireless was still going strong. I happen to have been there for that, although I had power after a half hour (party at my place!) and Vonage was back to working. I didn't care, I only used Vonage that night to order Chinese for my guests.

      Aside from that, you do realize that the landline companies aren't allowed to completely cut off your service, right? They have to allow the line to access 911 services. So, even if you get VOIP you can still have that corded phone plugged into the land line incase of an emergency. You could also just use a cell phone, as they have similar reliability and the chances that both services would be out is pretty slim. If they are, skip Walgreens and call 911 from the payphone outside.

    4. Re:Take heed by kesuki · · Score: 2, Insightful

      whoo hoo you just said 100% uptime is the only 'acceptable' uptime for anyone. there is a 'bug' in the decimal system. any 'infinitely repeating' decimal string can through a valid algebra equasion be proven to be equal to 1 (or in this case 100).

      EG: 99.99~ = X ; 10*99.99~ = 10x ; 999.99~ - X = 10X -X ; 900 = 9X ; 100 = X

      keep in mind in order to offer 100% uptime the telcos have triple circuit redundancy... and even then '100%' means 'barring an act of god, or terrorism'

  2. 99.4% sucks by Gothmolly · · Score: 4, Insightful

    my land line works 100% of the time. That's not 2 nines, or even 5 nines. 100% of the time, through blizzard after blizzard here in the Northeast US, through rainstorms, through anything. You know what's nice about that? 911.
    99.4% = 4 HOURS a month, your phone doesn't work. That's absurdly crappy. At that reliability level, it should be a free product.

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
    1. Re:99.4% sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      That's great for you, though somehow I doubt that you actually tested your phone service continually.

      Some of us don't have magical phones though, and I personally was without any sort of phone service more than 4 days this year. Not due to a storm or network outage, just due to damage on my line that the phone company took their sweet time to repair.

      That's less than 87% uptime for the month and less than 99% uptime for the year. It's also not the first time I've been without phone service for serveral days -- if your service goes out anytime after Friday at 8 AM it's not getting fixed until next week.

    2. Re:99.4% sucks by DroopyStonx · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sorry, even land lines are NEVER 100% guaranteed to be up.

      Phones go out just like anything else - electricity, cable, you name it.

      --
      We have secretly replaced these Slashdot mods' sense of humor with a rusty nail. Let's see if they notice!!
  3. 99.4%!? by Shkuey · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That's terrible, that means with the best service 1 in 200 calls doesn't go through? I run an old school PBX where we make hundreds, possibly thousands, of calls each day. I couldn't deal with that kind of poor reliability.

  4. Baby Bells by ffejie · · Score: 4, Insightful
    The Baby Bells keep their uptime greater than 5 nines typically.

    99.999%

    Show me VoIP that does 99.99% and then I'll consider switching.

    --
    Disagreeing with me does not mean you get to mod me troll.
  5. Love to Hate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Your local telco that everyone loves to hate is required to provide 5 nines availability. Your service must work 99.999% of the time.

  6. 99.4% is not that good by Zebra_X · · Score: 2, Insightful

    99.4% of uptime equates to 518.4 seconds of unavailablity per day.

    That's roughly 8 minutes of the day that you won't be able to use your phone. Given that unavailability is usually related to demand, you won't be able to use your phone for 8 minutes during the hours that you'd really like to.

    Also, consider that for a bit more money you can get a land line with better voice quality and unlimited calling as well.

  7. QOS, 911, regulation by davidwr · · Score: 3, Insightful

    With regular phone service, you get:

    Independent network, assuming cable not DSL
    911
    Quality of service: availability, reliability, signal/noise, time-to-repair, etc.
    Regulation on quality and pricing
    Works when the power is out
    Not as cheap as VoIP, unless you are poor and get subsidized service

    With VoIP you get:
    Network dependent on underlying internet
    Limited if any 911
    Best-effort signal/noise
    Good-enough(?)-but-unregulated quality of service
    Little or no regulation beyond 911
    Works when the power is out as long as your batteries last.
    Cheap.
    Generally no subsidized service, but most people on welfare aren't getting high-speed internet.

    The best part: You get to choose.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  8. And this is news? by Szaman2 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    How is this news? I would expect VOIP to get better. If it was getting worse - that would be newsworthy I guess...

    What next? Study shows that CPU's are getting faster? Study shows that Linux is getting easier to install and maintain? I would say this is the natural progress. Things improve over time - that's just how it works.

  9. Or Put Another Way... by linuxwrangler · · Score: 4, Insightful

    94.8% is....

    20 full days per year down time or

    1.2 hours down EVERY DAY!

    And to make matters worse, failures tend to occur more often when things are heavily loaded - ie. not in the wee hours but rather when people actually want to use the phone.

    Obviously someone has a different definition of "not bad" than I do.

    I remember when M$ proudly claimed 99.9% uptime for NT. To me that sounded terrible. Over 3.5 FULL 24 HOUR DAYS of downtime every year. Horrid!

    --

    ~~~~~~~
    "You are not remembered for doing what is expected of you." - Atul Chitnis
  10. Have to Compare to Cell Phones (Not Land Lines) by Salis · · Score: 2, Insightful

    A lot of people have already lost their land line and are now using just cell phones. Service on cell phones is certainly not 99.99999%, nor even 94.8% (my guess). But people still use them vs. a land line.

    So, when you're comparing service availabity, cost, and features, you need to include cell phones as the dominant competitor.

    Really, your grandma won't be switching to VOIP. If anyone, it'll be people who already have a cell phone and want a cheap long-distance service as their land line. If they need to call 911, they'll be using their cell.

    -Howard

    --
    Favorite /. tagline: "On the eighth day, God created FORTRAN." And it was good.
  11. Near-whoring by DeadVulcan · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So many people shrieking, "99.4% sucks!!" It seems almost like karma whoring. Yeah, yeah. It sucks. So don't buy it. Can we move on?

    It depends on how the outages occur, doesn't it? If it means you occasionally need to redial, that's not a big deal at all. But if it means you might be without service for a whole day every few months, then that's terrible. There's a few subscribers who have piped up here with generally positive comments. Me, I can't say from personal experience.

    But to put it in perspective, in many places outside of first-world countries, I suspect 99.4% would be better reliability than you can get with any kind of service.

    --
    Accountability on the heads of the powerful.
    Power in the hands of the accountable.
  12. Sounds ok to m by recursiv · · Score: 2, Insightful

    99% is better than my cell phone, and I find that useful enough to pay for. Not saying they can't make improvements though.

    --
    I used to bulls-eye womp-rats in my pants
  13. Re:My vonage expereince has been great.... by pyrrhonist · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I have had 100% uptime -- e.g. I have never not had a dialtone when I picked up and to my knowledge have never been droppped.

    Of course you had a dialtone, because with VoIP it's generated by the phone.

    Try dialing out and count how many times you get the reorder tone.

    --
    Show me on the doll where his noodly appendage touched you.