Slashdot Mirror


U.S. House Votes to Extend Patriot Act

Rick Zeman writes "In the wake of today's 4 dud bombings in London, the U.S. House has voted to extend the Patriot Act by a vote of 257-171. This includes 10-year extensions to the two other provisions set to expire on December 31, one allowing roving wiretaps, and another allowing searches of library and medical records."

6 of 1,137 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Hmmm. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    I think you are looking for this quote...

    "Of course the people don't want war. But after all, it's the leaders of the country who determine the policy, and it's always a simple matter to drag the people along whether it's a democracy, a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism, and exposing the country to greater danger." -- Herman Goering at the Nuremberg trials

  2. Re:Talkin' bout a revolution by apoc.famine · · Score: 5, Informative

    My Rep voted against it. How did your reps vote?

    If they voted differently than you had wished, pick up the phone tomorrow, and let them know. Tell people you meet. Do something. Don't just bitch on slashdot.

    (Unless you can't vote in the US, at which point bitching is about all you can do about this latest vote.)

    --
    Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
  3. Re:Hmmm. by cdills · · Score: 5, Informative

    In Howard Zinn's book "Declarations of Independence," he cites a speech by a student at the Harvard Law School in the early 1960's given to a large group of parents and alumni. The student was speaking about current events, and said,

    "The streets of our country are in turmoil. The universities are filled with students rebelling and rioting. Communists are seeking to destroy our country. Russia is threatening us with her might. And the republic is in danger. Yes! Danger from within and without. We need law and order! Without law and order our nation cannot survive."

    The crowd applauded the words of the young speaker, and when the crowd hushed, he continued.

    "These words were spoken in 1932 by Adolf Hitler."

  4. Re:It's for the children! by ltbarcly · · Score: 5, Informative

    However, whenever anybody is asked to site a case in which some poor schmuck actually got shafted by these laws, they suddenly fall silent.

    The first rule of Patriot Act is don't talk about Patriot Act.

    Seriously though, the nasty thing about this stuff is that it all goes to an oversight court, the dealings of which are all secret.

    For example, when the ACLU sued the government related to these laws, they couldn't even talk about the trial in public, not because it was ongoing, but because it was classified.

    So no, you don't hear about the abuses, because they are illegal to talk about, as that would be revealing a secret.

    In other news, the government is arresting and holding american citizens on american soil and declairing that they can keep them in jail forever without trial. Not scary at all, keep it moving, nothing to see here.

  5. Re:It's for the children! by brsmith4 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Ah, you know what? I think we need more links:

    1.
    2.
    3.
    4.
    5. A rebuttal for some sense of "objectivity", whatever that means.

  6. Re:It's for the children! by kbielefe · · Score: 5, Informative
    I might be inclined to believe your analysis if you got your facts straight. The USA PATRIOT Act has nothing to do with the authority to declare a U.S. citizen an enemy combatant and hold him or her as a prisoner of war. That authority comes from the war powers invoked in Public Law 107-40. Individual cases are subject to oversight both by the Supreme Court and by Congress.

    I suppose you also believe that the USA PATRIOT Act allows the FBI to perform a mass library record search without the approval of a judge. Libraries aren't even mentioned in the entire text of the law, and the language people blow out of proportion would only allow the search of a single person's records on approval of a federal judge with respect to a specific ongoing investigation. Please try to verify things you read on Slashdot before passing it on, including what I just said.

    Not that I disagree with you that things could quickly get out of hand. I assume because you feel so strongly on the matter that you have contacted your Congressman to support H.R. 1076: Detention of Enemy Combatants Act , which acknowledges the need to detain enemy combatants who are U.S. citizens, but enacts specific requirements on the duration, conditions, and judicial review of such detentions.

    --
    This space intentionally left blank.